Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling.

BACKGROUND: There have been no evidence-based guidelines on the optimal schedule for the radiological assessment of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma. This study aimed to recommend an appropriate radiological evaluation schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted glioma during the surveillance period through parametric modeling of the progression-free survival (PFS) curve. METHODS: A total of 234 patients with 1p/19q-codeleted glioma (137 grade II and 97 grade III) who completed regular treatment were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were stratified into each layered progression risk group by recursive partitioning analysis. A piecewise exponential model was used to standardize the PFS curves. The cutoff value of the progression rate among the remaining progression-free patients was set to 10% at each scan. RESULTS: Progression risk stratification resulted in 3 groups. The optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interval for patients without a residual tumor was every 91.2 weeks until 720 weeks after the end of regular treatment following the latent period for 15 weeks. For patients with a residual tumor after the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy, the optimal MRI interval was every 37.5 weeks until week 90 and every 132.8 weeks until week 361, while it was every 33.6 weeks until week 210 and every 14.4 weeks until week 495 for patients with a residual tumor after surgery only or surgery followed by radiotherapy only. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal radiological follow-up schedule for each progression risk stratification of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma can be established from the parametric modeling of PFS.

Radiological assessment schedule for high-grade glioma patients during the surveillance period using parametric modeling.

BACKGROUND: An optimal radiological surveillance plan is crucial for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients, which is determined arbitrarily in daily clinical practice. We propose the radiological assessment schedule using a parametric model of standardized progression-free survival (PFS) curves. METHODS: A total of 277 HGG patients (178 glioblastoma [GBM] and 99 anaplastic astrocytoma [AA]) from a single institute who completed the standard treatment protocol were enrolled in this cohort study and retrospectively analyzed. The patients were stratified into each layered risk group by genetic signatures and residual mass or through recursive partitioning analysis. PFS curves were estimated using the piecewise exponential survival model. The criterion of a 10% progression rate among the remaining patients at each observation period was used to determine the optimal radiological assessment time point. RESULTS: The optimal follow-up intervals for MRI evaluations of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type GBM was every 7.4 weeks until 120 weeks after the end of standard treatment, followed by a 22-week inflection period and every 27.6 weeks thereafter. For the IDH mutated GBM, scans every 13.2 weeks until 151 weeks are recommended. The optimal follow-up intervals were every 22.8 weeks for IDH wild-type AA, and 41.2 weeks for IDH mutated AA until 241 weeks. Tailored radiological assessment schedules were suggested for each layered risk group of the GBM and the AA patients. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal schedule of radiological assessments for each layered risk group of patients with HGG could be determined from the parametric model of PFS.

Development of the clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: There is no scale for rating the severity of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). In this study, we aimed to develop a novel scale for rating severity in patients with diverse AE syndromes and to verify the reliability and validity of the developed scale. METHODS: The key items were generated by a panel of experts and selected according to content validity ratios. The developed scale was initially applied to 50 patients with AE (development cohort) to evaluate its acceptability, reproducibility, internal consistency, and construct validity. Then, the scale was applied to another independent cohort (validation cohort, n = 38). RESULTS: A new scale consisting of 9 items (seizure, memory dysfunction, psychiatric symptoms, consciousness, language problems, dyskinesia/dystonia, gait instability and ataxia, brainstem dysfunction, and weakness) was developed. Each item was assigned a value of up to 3 points. The total score could therefore range from 0 to 27. We named the scale the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). The new scale showed excellent interobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.97) and intraobserver (ICC = 0.96) reliability for total scores, was highly correlated with modified Rankin scale (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.88). Additionally, in the validation cohort, the scale showed high interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.99) and internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.92). INTERPRETATION: CASE is a novel clinical scale for AE with a high level of clinimetric properties. It would be suitable for application in clinical practice and might help overcome the limitations of current outcome scales for AE. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:352-358.