RESUMO
The zebrafish model has been developed and evaluated for its ability to predict the toxicity of chemicals. Zebrafish additionally serve as an excellent model for assessing drug-induced cardiotoxicity, although zebrafish and mammalian hearts differ in structure. Recently, regulatory authorities have expressed concerns about a possible relationship between antipsychotics and risk of QTc interval prolongation, serious arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. In the current study, we performed a cardiovascular risk assessment of six atypical antipsychotic drugs in zebrafish, specifically, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. Visual endpoints, such as lethality, edema (the presence of heart and trunk edema), hemorrhage (clustering of a pool of blood in an area outside the normal circulation), abnormal body shape (including bent or misshapen caudal region of the larvae) and motility, were evaluated as general toxicity endpoints, and the heart beat rate calculated as the cardiovascular toxicity endpoint. The zebrafish model facilitates determination of the heart beat rate, and may thus be an attractive screening tool for cardiovascular risk assessment of atypical antipsychotic drugs to understand the variations in response to QT-prolonging drugs.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/toxicidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Peixe-Zebra/fisiologia , Anormalidades Induzidas por Medicamentos/patologia , Animais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Determinação de Ponto Final , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Larva , Dose Letal Mediana , Masculino , Atividade Motora/efeitos dos fármacos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
The present study investigated the clinical usefulness of plasma real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (plasma-PCR) in the prevention of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). First, we investigated the diagnostic value of plasma BK-PCR, urine BK-PCR, and urine cytology for the prediction of BKVAN retrospectively. Then we designed a prospective study of regular plasma-PCR monitoring and pre-emptive immunosuppression (IS) reduction based on the result. In the retrospective cohort, the prevalence of BKVAN was 3.7% (14/379) and the positive rate of decoy cells, urine-PCR (>1 × 10(10) copies/ml), and plasma-PCR (>1 × 10(4) copies/ml) was 18.6%, 11.1%, and 5.5%, respectively. Plasma-PCR was superior to urine-PCR or urine cytology in specificity and positive predictive value for detection of BKVAN. In prospective study, regular monitoring of plasma-PCR detected significant BKV viremia in 8.3% (12/145) and BKVAN in 1 patient (0.6%). After IS reduction, BKV viremia was eliminated in 91.6% (11/12) within 103 days (25-254). In patients with viremia, the frequency of acute rejection did not increase and allograft function did not differ significantly compared with those in patients without viremia during the first year post-transplant (P > 0.05, in both). Plasma-PCR is useful to predict an increased risk for BKVAN, and regular monitoring is effective to prevent the development of BKVAN.