Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)- and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization strategies. BACKGROUND: An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919). CONCLUSIONS: An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038).

Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque over time by computed tomography (CT) angiography stratified by plaque composition and its association with cardiovascular risk profiles. BACKGROUND: Data on the progression of atherosclerosis stratified by plaque composition with the use of noninvasive assessment by CT are limited and hampered by high measurement variability. METHODS: This analysis included patients who presented with acute chest pain to the emergency department but initially showed no evidence of acute coronary syndromes. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT at baseline and after 2 years with the use of a similar protocol. CT datasets were coregistered and assessed for the presence of calcified and noncalcified plaque at 1 mm cross sections of the proximal 40 mm of each major coronary artery. Plaque progression over time and its association with risk factors were determined. Measurement reproducibility and correlation to plaque volume was performed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: We included 69 patients (mean age 55 +/- 12 years, 59% male patients) and compared 8,311 coregistered cross sections at baseline and follow-up. At baseline, any plaque, calcified plaque, and noncalcified were detected in 12.5%, 10.1%, and 2.4% of cross sections per patient, respectively. There was significant progression in the mean number of cross sections containing any plaque (16.5 +/- 25.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 25.5, p = 0.01) and noncalcified plaque (3.1 +/- 5.8 vs. 4.4 +/- 7.0, p = 0.04) but not calcified plaque (13.3 +/- 23.1 vs. 14.2 +/- 22.0, p = 0.2). In longitudinal regression analysis, the presence of baseline plaque, number of cardiovascular risk factors, and smoking were independently associated with plaque progression after adjustment for age, sex, and follow-up time interval. The semiquantitative score based on cross sections correlated closely with plaque volume progression (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001) and demonstrated an excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.95 and kappa = 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary plaque burden of patients with acute chest pain significantly increases during the course of 2 years. Progression over time is dependent on plaque composition and cardiovascular risk profile. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to determine the effect of medical treatment on progression.