Remission assessment of rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice in China: a cross-sectional observational study.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the remission rate and describe the current use of medication in a large cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients under routine clinical care in China. RA patients were recruited from 40 large teaching hospitals nationwide in China. Data regarding RA disease activity, medication treatment, and adverse events were recorded using a standardized clinical data questionnaire. RA remission was evaluated by the 28 Joint Disease Activity Score DAS28-ESR Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) remission criteria. A total of 1945 patients with RA were included in the study. The proportions of patients who fulfilled the DAS28-ESR, CDAI, SDAI, and ACR/EULAR remission criteria were 10.90%, 6.17%, 5.04% , and 1.75%, respectively. Most patients had taken at least one disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), and the most common prescriptions included leflunomide (LEF) and methotrexate (MTX). DMARD combined with botanics were the most common and dominant strategy for RA management (29.16%). Overall, 433 patients (22.27%) had at least one adverse event. Gastrointestinal adverse events (41.27%) were the most frequently reported events. The incidence of side effects in patients using biologics DMARDs (bDMARDs) was significantly lower than that in those taking MTX, LEF, or sulfasalazine (SSZ). The remission rate of RA disease activity, as assessed in Chinese clinical practice, was very low. Adverse effects of the medicine occurred in approximately one in five RA patients, with bDMARDs were demonstrated to be the medication with the lowest side effects.

Classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis and validation of its performance in a multi-centre cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To develop classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) based on a large cohort of early inflammatory arthritis patients and to evaluate the performance of these criteria. METHODS: The study population comprised a cohort of early inflammatory arthritis patients with symptom duration less than one year. Classification criteria of ERA were developed by incorporating the most sensitive or specific variables. Performance of the ERA criteria, 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 803 patients were enrolled in this study. By the end of the one year follow-up, 514 patients were diagnosed with RA, 251 with other rheumatic diseases, and 38 patients with undifferentiated arthritis. The ERA criteria are as follows: 1) morning stiffness ≥30 minutes; 2) arthritis of 3 or more joint areas; 3) arthritis of hand joints; 4) positive RF; 5) positive anti-CCP antibody. Rheumatoid arthritis is defined by the presence of 3 or more of the criteria. The sensitivity (84.4%) of the ERA classification criteria was much higher than the 1987 ACR criteria (58.0%). In a validation cohort of early inflammatory arthritis patients, the area under the ROC curves (AUC) showed a better performance for the ERA criteria (0.906, 95%CI 0.866 to 0.945) than the 1987 ACR criteria (0.786, 95%CI 0.725 to 0.848) and the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (0.745, 95%CI 0.677 to 0.814). CONCLUSIONS: A set of ERA classification criteria has been developed with good performance for early RA. It is applicable in clinical practice and research.