Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and reliability of transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of fetal breech descent in the birth canal, by measuring the breech progression angle (BPA). METHODS: Women with a singleton pregnancy with the fetus in breech presentation between 34 and 41 weeks' gestation were recruited. Transperineal ultrasound images were acquired in the midsagittal view for each woman, twice by one operator and once by another. Each operator measured the BPA after anonymization of the transperineal ultrasound images. BPA was defined as the angle between a line running along the long axis of the pubic symphysis and another line extending from the most inferior portion of the pubic symphysis tangentially to the lowest recognizable fetal part in the maternal pelvis. Each operator was blinded to all other measurements performed for each woman. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BPA measurement was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To investigate the presence of any bias, intra- and interobserver agreement was also analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis. Student's t-test and Levene's W0 test were used to investigate whether a number of different clinical factors had an effect on systematic differences and homogeneity, respectively, between BPA measurements. RESULTS: Overall, 44 women were included in the analysis. BPA was measured successfully by both operators on all images. Both intra- and interobserver agreement analyses showed excellent reproducibility in BPA measurement, with ICCs of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.90), respectively. The mean difference between measurements was 0.4° (95% CI, -1.4 to 2.2°) for intraobserver repeatability and -0.4° (95% CI, -2.6 to 1.8°) for interobserver repeatability. The upper limits of agreement were 12.0° (95% CI, 8.9-15.1°) and 13.6° (95% CI, 9.9-17.3°) for intra- and interobserver repeatability, respectively. The lower limits of agreement were -11.2° (95% CI, -14.3 to -8.1°) and -14.4° (95% CI, -18.2 to -10.7°) for intra- and interobserver repeatability, respectively. No systematic difference between BPA measurements was found on either intra- or interobserver agreement analysis. None of the clinical factors examined (maternal body mass index, maternal age, gestational age at the ultrasound scan and parity) showed a statistically significant effect on intra- or interobserver reliability. CONCLUSIONS: BPA represents a new feasible and highly reproducible measurement for the evaluation of fetal breech descent in the birth canal. Future studies assessing its usefulness in the prediction of successful external cephalic version and breech vaginal delivery are needed. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Assessment of levator hiatal area using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and superficial dyspareunia treated with pelvic floor muscle physiotherapy: randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is associated with chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia and pelvic floor muscle hypertonia. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor physiotherapy (PFP) on the area of levator ani hiatus during Valsalva maneuver, assessed using transperineal ultrasound, in women with DIE suffering from superficial dyspareunia. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial of 34 nulliparous women diagnosed with DIE and associated superficial dyspareunia. After an initial clinical examination, all patients underwent three-dimensional/four-dimensional (3D/4D) transperineal ultrasound to measure the levator hiatal area (LHA) at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction and on maximum Valsalva maneuver, and were asked to rate their pain symptoms using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Eligible women were assigned randomly (1:1 ratio) to no intervention (control group, 17 women) or treatment with five individual sessions of PFP (study group, 17 women). Four months after the first examination, all women underwent a second evaluation of pain symptoms and LHA on transperineal ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in LHA on maximum Valsalva maneuver between the baseline and follow-up examinations. The percentage changes in pain symptoms between the two examinations, including superficial and deep dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dysuria and dyschezia, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty women, comprising 17 in the study group and 13 in the control group, completed the study and were included in the analysis. The percentage change in LHA on maximum Valsalva maneuver between the two examinations was higher in the study group than in the control group (20.0 ± 24.8% vs -0.5 ± 3.3%; P = 0.02), indicating better pelvic floor muscle relaxation. After PFP treatment, the NRS score for superficial dyspareunia remained almost unchanged in the control group (median change in NRS (Δ-NRS), 0 (interquartile range (IQR), 0-0)) while a marked reduction was observed in the study group (median Δ-NRS, -3 (IQR, -4 to -2); P < 0.01). Moreover, there was a significant difference between the PFP and control groups with regards to the change in chronic pelvic pain (median Δ-NRS, 0 (IQR, -2 to 0) vs 0 (IQR, 0-1); P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In women with DIE, PFP seems to result in increased LHA on Valsalva maneuver, as observed by 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound, leading to improved superficial dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle relaxation. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

How do Community Hospitals respond to the healthcare needs of elderly patients? A population-based observational study in the Emilia-Romagna Region.

BACKGROUND: Intermediate Care Services have been developed to provide high-quality and sustainable care to the elderly patients with chronic diseases. Italian Community Hospitals, inspired by the British model, are an example of Intermediate Care. The aim of this study was: (1) to describe the healthcare needs met by the Community Hospitals of Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy, by depicting the characteristics of hospitalized patients, and (2) to evaluate process and outcome indicators by conducting a comparative assessment of the quality of care. STUDY DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The study population included patients living in Emilia-Romagna who were discharged during 2016 from the 14 Community Hospitals of the region. Data were retrieved from the Regional Informative System of Community Hospitals database; multi-morbidity profiles were identified through the Hospital Discharge Records Database and the Outpatient Pharmaceutical Database. In-hospital variation of the 5-level Modified Barthel Index and hospital readmissions within 3 months of discharge were retrieved for each patient. The presence of recurrent patterns of multi-morbidity, i.e., clinical conditions that tend to co-occur, was investigated using unsupervised cluster analysis. RESULTS: The study population included 2,121 patients. Mean age was 79.5 years, mean Community Hospital stay was 22.4 days (range 13.1 - 31.5 days) and 62.5% of the patients were females. The most common sources of admission were hospital (71.8%) and home (27.0%). Routine discharges were 60.0%, planned home discharges were 13.6%, and transfers to public or private hospitals were 10.8%. We identified two multi-morbidity clusters unevenly distributed across Community Hospitals. Mean number of co-occurring chronic conditions per patient was different in the two clusters (3.0 vs. 4.7, p < 0.004). Mean Modified Barthel Index at admission and discharge was 32.2 and 47.6, respectively. Mean difference of 15.3 between values at admission and discharge was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Three-month hospital readmissions occurred for 20.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: The development of Intermediate Care Services, and in particular Community Hospitals, requires guidelines and protocols to define who among the patients can benefit more from this type of care. It is necessary to assess the quality of care provided by these facilities through appropriate and internationally comparable measures, including patient experience indicators.