Preliminary clinical study of the accuracy of a digital axiographic recording system for the assessment of sagittal condylar inclination.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate the accuracy of a digital axiographic recording system in tracing the sagittal condylar inclination. METHODS: An axiographic examination that records the sagittal condylar path during protrusive/retrusive movement was performed on ten patients. Each subject was registered five different times by two different systems: 1) the Cadiax Gamma Diagnostic 4 computerized system as the control; 2) the Zebris Jaw Motion Analyser+  Optic System as the tested digital axiographic recording system. The records obtained allow to calculate the kinematic terminal transverse horizontal axis and the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) at 3 and 5 mm along the pro-retrusive path. A linear mixed model was used to analyze if there was a statistically significant difference between the two systems. RESULTS: The mean left SCI value recorded by Zebris system were 49.81 ± 10.64° at 3 mm, 48.10 ± 11.04° at 5 mm, while the values recorded by Gamma system were 55.16° at 3 mm, 52.18° at 5 mm. The mean right SCI value recorded by Zebris system were 54.53 ± 10.26° at 3 mm, 51.85 ± 8.55° at 5 mm, while the values recorded by Gamma system were 49.68° at 3 mm, 48.23° at 5 mm. Linear mixed model showed no significant statistical difference between the two systems. CONCLUSIONS: Based on preliminary results, the Zebris Jaw Motion Analyzer+ Optic System demonstrates comparable accuracy to the Cadiax Gamma Diagnostic 4 when measuring sagittal condylar inclination. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The digital axiographic recording system enables to evaluate sagittal condylar inclination and to adjust virtual articulators in a digital workflow.

Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records.

PURPOSE: To investigate the trueness and precision of virtual facebow records using a smartphone as a three-dimensional (3D) face scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty repeated virtual facebow records were performed on two subjects using a smartphone as a 3D face scanner. For each subject, a virtual facebow was attached to his/her maxillary arch, and face scans were performed using a smartphone with a 3D scan application. The subject's maxillary arch intraoral scan was aligned to the face scan by the virtual facebow fork. This procedure was repeated 10 times for each subject. To investigate if the maxillary scan is located at the right position to the face, these virtual facebow records were superimposed to a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) head scan from the same subject by matching the face scan to the 3D face reconstruction from CBCT images. The location of maxillary arch in virtual facebow records was compared with its position in CBCT. The "trueness" of the proposed procedure is defined as the deviation between maxilla arch position in virtual facebow records and the CBCT images. The "precision" is defined as the deviation between each virtual facebow record. The linear deviation at left central incisor (#9), left first molar (#14), and right first molar (#3), as well as angular deviation of occlusal plane were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Differences between two objects were also explored with Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: The 20 virtual facebow records using the smartphone 3D scanner deviated from the CBCT measurements (trueness) by 1.14 ± 0.40 mm at #9, 1.20 ± 0.50 mm at #14, 1.12 ± 0.51 mm at the #3, and 1.48 ± 0.56° in the occlusal plane. The VFTs deviated from each other by 1.06 ± 0.50 mm at #9, 1.09 ± 0.49 mm at #14, 1.11 ± 0.58 mm at #3, and 0.81 ± 0.58° in the occlusal plane. When all sites combined, the trueness was 1.14 ± 0.40 mm, and the precision was 1.08 ± 0.52 mm. Out of eight measurements, three measurements were significantly different between subjects. Nevertheless, the mean difference was small. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual facebow records made using smartphone-based face scan can capture the maxilla position with high trueness and precision. The deviation can be anticipated as around 1 mm in linear distance and 1° in angulation.

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients With Implants Based on Facial Profile Assessment: A Case Report.

PURPOSE: To introduce a user-friendly protocol for implant-retained prosthetic rehabilitation of fully edentulous patients based on facial profile and the cephalometric intermaxillary relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients with implants based on facial profile assessment protocol commences with a clinical and cephalometric analysis, followed by a preliminary projection to obtain a harmonious interarch relationship, eventually stabilized by the preplanned prosthesis. The protocol is divided into the following 5 phases: esthetic evaluation; cephalometric-occlusal assessment; surgery; provisionalization; and definitive prosthesis. Evaluation of patient's satisfaction from the treatment provided was performed through a preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale scores. RESULTS: The patient was granted immediate function and superior esthetics at day 1 of the treatment. These results were re-evaluated on an interval of 18 months and continued to be stable. The overall treatment time was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Our recommended protocol gives the clinician a chance to grasp results beyond the offered by traditional protocols by using a wider perspective of rehabilitation, involving the patient's facial profile, thus fulfilling the integration of both occlusal and cephalometric parameters in a unified surgical-prosthetic approach.