Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabet Med ; 36(8): 1003-1012, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31026353

RESUMO

AIM: The Counterweight-Plus weight management programme achieved 46% remission of Type 2 diabetes at 1 year in the DiRECT trial. We estimated the implementation costs of the Counterweight-Plus programme and its 1-year cost-effectiveness in terms of diabetes remission, compared with usual care, from the UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. METHODS: Within-trial total costs included programme set-up and running costs (practitioner appointment visits, low-energy formula diet sachets and training), oral anti-diabetes and anti-hypertensive medications, and healthcare contacts. Total costs were calculated for aggregated resource use for each participant and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were based on 1000 non-parametric bootstrap iterations. RESULTS: One-year programme costs under trial conditions were estimated at £1137 per participant (95% CI £1071, £1205). The intervention led to a significant cost-saving of £120 (95% CI £78, £163) for the oral anti-diabetes drugs and £14 (95% CI £7.9, £22) for anti-hypertensive medications compared with the control. Deducting the cost-savings of all healthcare contacts from the intervention cost resulted an incremental cost of £982 (95% CI £732, £1258). Cost per 1 year of diabetes remission was £2359 (95% CI £1668, £3250). CONCLUSIONS: Remission of Type 2 diabetes within 1-year can be achieved at a cost below the annual cost of diabetes (including complications). Providing a reasonable proportion of remissions can be maintained over time, with multiple medical gains expected, as well as immediate social benefits, there is a case for shifting resources within diabetes care budgets to offer support for people with Type 2 diabetes to attempt remission. (Clinical Trial Registry No.: ISRCTN03267836).


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Programas de Redução de Peso/economia , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Dieta/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Medicina Geral/economia , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Estatal/economia
2.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 23(3): 260-3, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20163511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity is a priority for all health professionals and requires resources that are regularly evaluated to ensure that they meet the needs of their target population. Dietitians in Obesity Management UK (DOM UK), a specialist group of the British Dietetic Association, commissioned an evaluation of their resources. These have been developed for use by Dietitians to determine the uptake and implementation of DOM UK resources in dietetic practice, as well as the opinions and suggestions of Dietitians concerning the resource pack. METHODS: A random sample of 20% (n = 33) of the 165 Dietitians who had ordered resources were selected from the DOM UK database along with 20% of DOM UK members who had not (n = 38). Data were then collected using telephone-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: Most of the Dietitians who used the resources favoured them because they improved their consultations and were liked by patients. Resources 'j' (controlling your portions) and 'k' (planning your meals) were most frequently used. However, the cost of the pack was a deterrent to both new and repeat orders. The evaluation also revealed that 17% of DOM UK members were unaware of these resources and 23% who ordered them were unaware that online samples were available. CONCLUSION: The evaluation showed that most Dietitians who used the resources found them very useful especially resources concerning meal planning and portion sizes. However, concerns about cost and the need for greater awareness about the resources among Dietitians were highlighted.


Assuntos
Peso Corporal , Dietética/métodos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Dieta , Dietética/economia , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA