Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions.

Screening is an essential prevention practice for a number of health conditions. However, screening coverage remains generally low. Studies that investigate determinants of screening participation are becoming more common, but oftentimes investigate screening for health conditions in an individualized rather than integrated fashion. In routine clinical practice, however, healthcare professionals are often confronted with situations in which several screening procedures are recommended for the same patient. The consideration of their common determinants may support a more integrated screening approach. The objectives of this umbrella review were therefore to examine: 1) the determinants (barriers and facilitators) that have been identified in relation to recommended health screening procedures; and 2) the modifiable determinants (in primary care) common across health conditions or specific to individual procedures. Results were presented through a narrative synthesis. PubMed, PsycInfo and Cochrane were searched up to January 2022. Systematic reviews reporting determinants of participation in health screening procedures with grade A or B recommendation according to the US Preventive Services Task Force were included. A total of 85 systematic reviews were included, most which contained both qualitative and quantitative studies on determinants that describe individual factors (961 occurrences), social factors (113 occurrences, healthcare professional factors (149 occurrences), health system factors (105 occurrences) and screening procedure factors (99 occurrences). The most studied screening procedures concerned cervical cancer/human papillomavirus (n = 33), breast cancer (n = 28), colorectal cancer (n = 25) and the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 12). Other conditions have been under-studied (e.g. cardiovascular problems, lung cancer, syphilis). The individual domain, including determinants such as knowledge, beliefs and emotions, was the most covered across health conditions. Healthcare professional's recommendations and the quality of patient-provider communication were identified to have a strong influence on screening participation in most conditions. The other three domains included determinants which were more specific to a condition or a population. Various determinants modifiable in primary care were found in the individual domain and in the health system, healthcare professional and screening procedure domains. Quality was assessed as low for most systematic reviews included. The identification of various modifiable determinants common across conditions highlights the potential of an integrated screening participation approach. Interventions may address common determinants in a broader person-centred framework within which tailoring to specific procedures or populations can be considered. This approach needs to be explored in intervention studies. The systematic review registration is PROSPERO CRD42019126709.

Health Profile of Precarious Migrants Attending the Médecins Du Monde's Health and Social Care Centres in France: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective: The present study aimed to compare the precarious migrants' health problems managed in Médecins du Monde's health and social care centres (CASO) with those of patients attending general practice in France. Methods: We compared the most frequent health problems managed in the 19 CASO in metropolitan France with those of a national sample of usual general practice consultations, after standardisation for age and sex. Results: Precarious migrants had fewer health problems managed per consultation than other patients (mean: 1.31 vs. 2.16), and these corresponded less frequently to chronic conditions (21.3% vs. 46.8%). The overrepresented health problems among CASO consultations were mainly headache (1.11% vs. 0.45%), viral hepatitis (1.05% vs. 0.20%), type 1 diabetes (1.01% vs. 0.50%) and teeth/gum disease (1.01% vs. 0.23%). Their underrepresented health problems were mainly lipid disorder (0.39% vs. 8.20%), depressive disorder (1.36% vs. 5.28%) and hypothyroidism (0.50% vs. 3.08%). Prevention issues were nominal in precarious migrants (0.16%). Conclusion: Both chronic somatic and mental conditions of precarious migrants are presumably underdiagnosed. Their screening should be improved in primary care.

INN or brand name drug prescriptions: a multilevel, cross-sectional study in general practice.

PURPOSE: The prescription in International Nonproprietary Names (INN) is a legal obligation for all physicians in France since January 2015. The objective of this study was to analyze the frequency and main factors of INN drug prescribing in general practice. METHODS: Multicenter cross-sectional study conducted with 11 interns acting as observers of 23 GP trainers between November 2015 and January 2016. Two evaluators analyzed all GPs' drug prescriptions to identify INN or brand name prescriptions. RESULTS: The database included 4957 drugs prescribed during 1647 visits. Of these, 1462 (29.5% [95% CI 28.2-30.8%]) were prescribed only in INN. According to the multivariate analyses, the factors favoring INN prescribing were as follows: at the drug level, its initial prescribing (OR = 1.4), a nonspecific prescribing objective (OR = 1.6), its listing in the generic drug index with (OR = 7.7) or without (OR = 2.9) efficiency objective included in the payment for public health objectives (PPHO) program, and the oral route of administration (OR from 0.4 for the percutaneous route to 0.2 for the pulmonary route); at the patient level, the male gender (OR = 1.3), the age of 15 years or more (OR = 1.9), and the absence of a long-term condition (OR = 1.3); at the physician level, the reception of a public healthcare insurance representative (OR = 4.1), the nonreception of pharmaceutical sales representatives (OR = 3.0), and the urban practice environment (OR = 2.8). CONCLUSIONS: In 2015, less than one third of drugs were prescribed in INN only in general practice. The use of various incentives and regulatory measures is likely to favor the prescription of INNs by practitioners.

Developing a Return to Work Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors with the Intervention Mapping Protocol: Challenges and Opportunities of the Needs Assessment.

Return to work (RTW) is an important step for breast cancer survivors (BCSs). However, they face many barriers that affect particularly women with low socioeconomic status (SES). Health care, workplace, and insurance actors lack knowledge and collaborate poorly. No intervention to date has proven effective to reduce social disparities in employment after breast cancer. The intervention mapping (IM) protocol is being used in France to develop, implement, and evaluate an intervention to facilitate and sustain RTW after breast cancer [FAciliter et Soutenir le retour au TRAvail après un Cancer du Sein (FASTRACS) project]. The research question of this study was to elicit the needs for RTW after breast cancer from various stakeholders' point of view. The aim of this study was to describe the process and the preliminary results of the needs assessment of the FASTRACS project. Different methods were followed to (a) establish and work with a planning group and (b) conduct a needs assessment to create a logic model of the problem. A planning group was organized to gather the stakeholders with the research team. A review of the literature and indicators was conducted to identify the magnitude of the problem and the factors influencing RTW. A qualitative inquiry was conducted with 12 focus groups and 48 individual semi-structured interviews to explore the needs and experience of the stakeholders. The results of these tasks were the proposition of a charter of partnership to structure the participative process, a review of the scientific evidence and indicators, and the description by the stakeholders of their needs and experience. Many stakeholders disagreed with the concept of "early intervention." They advocated for a better support of BCSs during their RTW, emphasized as a process. Anticipation, intersectoral collaboration, and workplace accommodation were mentioned to fit the needs of the BCS and their environment. A logic model of the problem was elaborated from these data. The ability of the model to consider specific characteristics of women with low SES is discussed, with a view to developing the FASTRACS intervention through the next steps of the IM protocol.

[Towards a national strategy on the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders. A shared approach among the French National College of General Practitioners and specialists of neurocognitive disorders]. / Vers une stratégie nationale de diagnostic des troubles cognitifs. Approche commune du Collège de médecine générale et des spécialistes des troubles neurocognitifs.

Neurocognitive disorders leading to progressive cognitive, functional and behavioural impairment are often undiagnosed or diagnosed lately. But tailored care and therapeutics help in implementing secondary and tertiary prevention dynamics aiming at preserving quality of life and delaying, anticipating or preventing behavioural crisis and severe stages of dementia. Moreover, the diagnosis of numerous diseases induces specific care and therapeutics, as well access to research and clinical trials. For the first time, the representatives of the National College of General Practitioners, the French Federation of Memory Centres, the French Federation of Gerontology and Geriatrics, the French Federation of Neurology, the French Society of Psychogeriatrics and the national plan on neurodegenerative diseases propose a graduated and tailored diagnosis strategy involving primary care and specialists of neurocognitive disorders. This strategy has been built in the context of the national plan on neurodegenerative diseases, the European Joint Action "Act on dementia", and has been consensually agreed after a seminar animated by the National College of General Practitioners in March 2017.

Comparison of French training and non-training general practices: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: As the medicine practiced in hospital settings has become more specialized, training in primary care is becoming increasingly essential for medical students, especially for future general practitioners (GPs). Only a few limited studies have investigated the representativeness of medical practices delivering this training. The aim of this study was to assess the representativeness of French GP trainers in terms of socio-demographics, patients and activities. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study covering all private GPs practicing in the Rhône-Alpes region of France in 2011. This population consisted of 4992 GPs, including 623 trainers and 4369 non-trainers, managing 8,198,684 individual patients. Data from 2011 to 2012 were provided by the Regional Health Care Insurance (RHCI). We compared GP trainers with non-trainers using the Pearson chi-square test for qualitative variables and the Student t-test for quantitative variables RESULTS: GP trainers do not differ from non-trainers for gender, but they tend to be younger, more frequently in mid-career, and more likely to practice in a rural area. Their patients are broadly representative of patients attending general practice for age (with the exception of a higher consultation rate for infants), but patients with medical fee exemption status relating to low income are underrepresented. GP trainers have a heavier workload in terms of office visits and on-call duties. They prescribe a higher proportion of generic drugs, perform more electrocardiograms and cervical smears, and fewer plaster casts. GP trainers show better performance in diabetes follow-up, and to a lesser extent for seasonal flu vaccination and mammograms. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and patients of training practices are globally representative, which is particularly critical in countries such as France, where the length of specialty training in a general practice setting is still limited to a few months. In addition, GP trainers tend to have better clinical performance, which conforms to their teaching modelling role and may encourage other GPs to become trainers.

[Factors associated with drug prescription in general practice: a multicenter cross-sectional study]. / Facteurs associés à la prescription médicamenteuse en médecine générale : une étude transversale multicentrique.

OBJECTIVE: Iatrogenic, environmental and economic consequences of drug prescription are public health issues. This study was designed to identify physician, patient and consultation characteristics that influence drug prescription in general practice. METHODS: A national multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted in general practice from December 2011 to Apri/2012. Bivariate analyses were performed, followed by multivariate analyses based on a mixed model. RESULTS: At least one drug was prescribed in 16,626 (80.7%) of 20,600 consultations conducted by 128 practitioner. Apart from the number of health problems managed (OR= 10.6 [8.8; 13.0] if :2 4), independent patient-related factors were female gender (OR= 1.1 [1.0; 1.2]), extreme ages (OR= 1.3 [1.1; 1.5]younger than 4 years, OR= 1.5 [1.3; 1.8] from 5 to 14 years, and OR= 1.3 {1.2; 1.5] older than 60 years vs. between 15 to 29 years), new patients (OR= 0.8 {0. 7; 0.9]), work accident or occupational disease (OR= 0.3 {0.3; 0.4]). For the physician, drug prescription was linked to visits by pharmaceutical representatives (OR = 1.6 [1.2; 2.0] if :2 5 times a week) but not to visits by Public Health Insurance delegates or signature of the contract designed to improve individual practices (CAP/). CONCLUSIONS: Independently of health problems, patient and physician characteristics, including visits by pharmaceutical representatives, influence drug prescription.

Which functionalities are available in the electronic health record systems used by French general practitioners? An assessment study of 15 systems.

OBJECTIVE: Whereas an unprecedented effort is currently under way worldwide for the implementation of electronic health record (EHR) systems, their capabilities are poorly understood, especially in primary care. The objective of this study was to assess the main functionalities of the EHR systems used in French general practices. METHODS: Among the 20 EHR systems marketed in France, we assessed the 15 systems used by more than 1500 general practitioners in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region in the southeast part of France. Each EHR system was assessed in a general practice office, using two clinical vignettes describing virtual patient consultations. The evaluation criteria were derived from the EuroRec requirements for EHR system quality. The assessment scale included 37 criteria grouped into three sets: background data, consultation data, and exchange functionalities. The scoring system used, totalling 64 points, was based on the validation of the criteria and was adjusted based on the possibility of standardising the data. A high score indicated a good EHR system quality. RESULTS: The median global score was 32 points out of a possible 64 (range: 20-39). The median score was 12 points out of 22 (range: 6-15) for the background data set, 16 points out of 32 (range: 9-22) for the consultation data set, and four points out of 10 (range: 0-6) for the exchange functionalities. No association was found between the number of users and the assessment score of the EHR systems (p=0.79). One third of the EHR systems lacked a problem list and only one of them supported the episode of care. CONCLUSION: Functionalities noticeably vary among the EHR systems currently used in French primary care. Whereas these systems are globally very focused on drug prescriptions, several core functionalities are frequently lacking. They are also poorly interoperable for healthcare professionals and patients. Further research is necessary to assess their actual use.

[Mini Nutritional Assessment: a reproducibility study for the elderly]. / Mini Nutritional Assessment: une étude de reproductibilité en institution pour personnes âgées.

The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the most used scale for detecting undernutrition in clinical practice, has been validated in the hospital setting. We have evaluated its reproducibility in a French nursing home for dependent elderly people. It is globally acceptable, but some items should be more standardized.

[Diagnostic strategies for acute tonsillitis in France: a cost-effectiveness study]. / Stratégies de diagnostic de l'angine aiguë en France : une étude coût-efficacité

CONTEXT: Inability to identify clinically group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillitis has resulted for a long time in treating all tonsillitis with antibiotics in France. The use of the rapid detection tests (RDT) for GAS is currently recommended, in order to keep antibiotics only for GAS tonsillitis. Our objective was to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing various strategies for the management of acute tonsillitis in France. METHODS: We used a decision analysis model, including seven strategies (S) for tonsillitis management, specifically in children and in adults: S1: observation only (reference strategy); S2: clinical scoring; S3: RDT testing; S4: throat culture; S5: clinical scoring combined with RDT testing; S6: RDT testing combined with throat culture; S7: systematic antibiotic therapy. The criterion for effectiveness was the absence of locoregional suppurative complications. RESULTS: The use of the RDT alone had the best cost-effectiveness ratio in both adults and children. For this strategy, we estimated the cost per suppurative complication avoided at 970€ in children and at 903€ in adults. For the strategy associating a confirmative throat culture to the RDT, the extra cost per suppurative complication avoided was estimated at 106,666€ in children and at 228,000€ in adults. Sensitivity analysis showed the stability of the model while making the main parameters vary. CONCLUSION: In acute tonsillitis, in both adults and children, RDT testing by practitioners is the more efficient strategy to identify and treat patients with GAS tonsillitis. Combining RDT testing with throat culture can provide additional effectiveness, but at the cost of a significant extra charge for the community.