Opportunities to Advance Postpartum Pelvic Floor Care With a Health Equity-based Conceptual Framework.

An essential part of postpartum care includes the evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Postpartum PFDs are common and occur in over 40% of postpartum women. Despite significant advancements in urogynecology to understand postpartum PFDs and their treatments, there has been a lack of attention to addressing equity in postpartum pelvic floor care. In this article, we address the current scientific understanding of postpartum PFDs while adapting a health equity-based conceptual framework to highlight areas of opportunity in optimizing postpartum pelvic floor care.

Patients' Perceptions on Surgical Care Suspension for Pelvic Floor Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate patients' attitudes toward the postponement of their scheduled procedures for pelvic floor disorders (PFD) because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary objectives were to identify patients who were upset with the postponement of their PFD procedures and to identify factors that are associated with being upset because of the delay in care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, survey-based study of women from a single urban, academic practice using a novel questionnaire. The study cohort included women whose PFD surgeries or office procedures were postponed between March 17 and April 30, 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-eight women had surgeries postponed; 68 (70%) responded to our questionnaire. Nearly half of the respondents (32/68, 47.1%) were upset about their procedures being postponed. Upset patients reported a greater impact of PFD symptoms on their mood than those who were not upset (P=0.002). Those who were upset were also more likely to report feelings of isolation (P=0.006), fear that their PFD would worsen because of delayed care (P < 0.001), and anxiety over surgery postponement (P < 0.001) than those who were not upset about the delays. When controlling for anxiety, social isolation, and impact of PFD symptom, anxiety (adjusted odds ratio = 15.7; 95% confidence interval = 3.7-66.6) and feeling of isolation (adjusted odds ratio = 9.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.5-63.7) remained associated with increased odds of being upset because of procedure delays. CONCLUSIONS: Half of women whose pelvic reconstructive procedures were postponed because of the COVID-19 pandemic were upset because of the delay in care, especially those who are emotionally and socially vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical Utility of Routine Preoperative Laboratory Assessment in a Urogynecologic Population.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of newly diagnosed, clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities on routine preoperative laboratory testing in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. METHODS: All urogynecologic cases performed at a single institution over a 3-year period were reviewed. Women undergoing major surgery routinely had a basic metabolic panel, complete blood count (CBC), and type and screen, whereas women undergoing minor surgery had testing at the surgeon's discretion. Demographics, surgical details, preoperative laboratory values, and instances of postoperative transfusion were abstracted. If testing revealed a clinically meaningful abnormality, physician notes were reviewed to determine whether the abnormality was previously known or led to surgical postponement. RESULTS: A total of 836 cases were identified: 411 major (49%) and 425 minor (51%). Patients had a mean ± SD age of 57 ± 13 years and body mass index of 27 ± 6 kg/m. Medical comorbidities were hypertension, 38%; diabetes, 24%; chronic kidney disease, 3%; and congestive heart failure, 4%; 89% had an American Society of Anesthesiologists class of less than or equal to 2. A total of 453 (54%) had preoperative CBC, and 367 (44%) had preoperative basic metabolic panel. Six (1.3%) new abnormalities (hemoglobin between 8.0 and 10.0) were identified on CBC. Thirty-one women had elevated creatinine level (>1.0), and 28 (90%) of these had a history of hypertension. No surgeries were postponed or changed owing to anemia, thrombocytopenia, or renal dysfunction. No clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities were identified. Type and screen were collected on 394 patients; none were transfused intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative laboratory testing does not identify clinically meaningful abnormalities or alter surgical management in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.

The Promise of PROMIS in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine the relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and health-related quality of life dimensions and to evaluate the utility of the PROMIS Profile in women undergoing surgical treatment for POP. METHODS: We performed a planned ancillary analysis of 103 women recruited between January 2014 and December 2015 to the Restricted Convalescence Outcomes following Urogynecologic Procedures study. All participants underwent surgery for POP and completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Patient Global Impression of Severity Scale, and the 57-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-57) questionnaire, preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. Data were analyzed using Pearson and Spearman correlations. RESULTS: Preoperative PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores were significantly correlated with all PROMIS domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with participation in social roles, pain interference, and higher pain intensity. Worse self-reported condition assessments on the Patient Global Impression of Severity were significantly correlated with worse physical function, more pain interference, and higher pain intensity on the PROMIS Profile at baseline. Postoperatively, PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, and all PROMIS Profile domain scores improved significantly (P ≤ 0.05). Correlations between PDFI-20, PFIQ-7, and PROMIS domains persisted at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of women undergoing surgery for POP, pelvic floor symptom severity is associated with health-related quality of life domains measured by the PROMIS-57.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and costs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and effectiveness outcomes between robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM). STUDY DESIGN: Records were reviewed for the first 27 RALM procedures at our institution. Age, BMI, insurance status, race, uterine size, and operative indication were used to select comparable patients who had undergone AM. Clinical and efficiency outcomes were compared stratifying for uterine size, specimen weight, and matched propensity scores. RESULTS: IV hydromorphone use was significantly lower for RALM (P < 0.01), with no significant differences in blood loss or complications. RALM patients had significantly shorter hospital stays; however, total hospital charges were higher (P < 0.0001). This likely reflects longer operating room time (P < 0.0001), which was magnified as specimen size increased (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: RALM patients require less IV hydromorphone, have shorter hospital stays, and have generally equivalent clinical outcomes compared with AM patients. Additionally, as specimen size increased, the operative efficiency of RALM decreased compared with AM.