Gaps in Care Among Uncontrolled Severe Asthma Patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the implementation of key guideline recommendations is critical for managing severe asthma (SA) in the treatment of uncontrolled disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess specialist visits and medication escalation in US patients with SA after events indicating uncontrolled disease (EUD) and associations with health outcomes and social disparity indicators. METHODS: Patients with SA appearing in administrative claims data spanning 2015 to 2020 were indexed hierarchically on asthma-related EUD, including hospitalizations, emergency department visits with systemic corticosteroid treatment, or outpatient visits with systemic corticosteroid treatment. Patients with SA without EUD served as controls. Eligibility included age 12 or greater, 12 months enrollment before and after index, no biologic use, and no other major respiratory disease during the pre-period. Escalation of care in the form of specialist visits and medication escalation, health care resource use, costs, and disease exacerbations were assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 180,736 patients with SA (90,368 uncontrolled and 90,368 controls). Between 35% and 51% of patients with SA with an EUD had no specialist visit or medication escalation. Follow-up exacerbations ranged from 51% to 4% across EUD cohorts, compared with 13% in controls. Among uncontrolled patients with SA who were Black or Hispanic/Latino, 41% and 38%, respectively, had no specialist visit or medication escalation after EUD, compared with 33% of non-Hispanic White patients. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of uncontrolled patients with SA had no evidence of specialist visits or medication escalation after uncontrolled disease, and there was a clear relationship between uncontrolled disease and subsequent health care resource use and exacerbations. Findings highlight the need for improved guideline-based care delivery to patients with SA, particularly for those facing social disparities.

Economic burden of nonadherence to standards of diabetes care.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of nonadherence to American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines on health care expenditures for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional cohort design, utilizing 2016-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of T2D who completed the supplemental T2D care survey were included in the study. Participants were categorized based on adherence to the 10 processes in the ADA guidelines into adherent (≥ 9 processes) and nonadherent (≤ 6 processes) categories. Propensity score matching was employed using a logistic regression model. After matching, total annual health care expenditure change from baseline year was compared using a t test. Further, imbalanced variables were controlled for in a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1619 patients representing 15,781,346 (SE = 438,832) individuals met the inclusion criteria, among whom 12.17% received nonadherent care. After propensity matching, those who received nonadherent care had $4031 higher total annual health care expenditures compared with their baseline year, whereas patients who received adherent care had $128 lower total annual health care expenditures compared with their baseline year. Further, multivariable linear regression adjusted for the imbalanced variables indicated that nonadherent care was associated with a mean (SE) $3470 ($1588) increase in the change from baseline health care expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to the ADA guidelines results in a significant increase in health care expenditures among patients with diabetes. The economic impact of nonadherent care for T2D is a significant and extensive issue that needs to be addressed. These findings emphasize the importance of providing care based on ADA guidelines.

Real-world experience of CAR T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has changed the treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, real-world experience reporting outcomes among older patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy is limited. We leveraged the 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims database and analyzed outcomes and cost associated with CAR T-cell therapy in 551 older patients (aged ≥65 years) with DLBCL who received CAR T-cell therapy between 2018 and 2020. CAR T-cell therapy was used in third line and beyond in 19% of patients aged 65 to 69 years and 22% among those aged 70 to 74 years, compared with 13% of patients aged ≥75 years. Most patients received CAR T-cell therapy in an inpatient setting (83%), with an average length of stay of 21 days. The median event-free survival (EFS) following CAR T-cell therapy was 7.2 months. Patients aged ≥75 years had significantly shorter EFS compared with patients aged 65 to 69 and 70 to 74 years, with 12-month EFS estimates of 34%, 43%, and 52%, respectively (P = .002). The median overall survival was 17.1 months, and there was no significant difference by age groups. The median total health care cost during the 90-day follow-up was $352 572 and was similar across all age groups. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with favorable effectiveness, but the CAR T-cell therapy use in older patients was low, especially in patients aged ≥75 years, and this age group had a lower rate of EFS, which illustrates the unmet need for more accessible, effective, and tolerable therapy in older patients, especially those aged ≥75 years.

Outcomes of antiviral treatment for influenza in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term effects of antiviral treatment on influenza-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and a diagnosis of influenza. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Database were used to identify patients with T2D and a diagnosis of influenza between October 1, 2016, and April 30, 2017. Patients who received antiviral treatment within 2 days of influenza diagnosis were identified and propensity score-matched 1:1 with a comparator cohort of untreated patients. HCRU (number of outpatient visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and duration of hospitalization) and costs were assessed over 1 full year and over each quarter after influenza diagnosis. RESULTS: Treated and untreated matched cohorts consisted of 2459 patients each. In the treated cohort vs the untreated cohort, emergency department visits were reduced 24.6% over 1 year after influenza diagnosis (mean [SD], 0.94 [1.76] vs 1.24 [2.47] visits; P < .0001) and were also reduced significantly during each quarter; the duration of hospitalization decreased 35.6% in the treated cohort vs the untreated cohort over 1 full year (mean [SD], 0.71 [3.36] vs 1.11 [5.60] days; P < .0023). Mean (SD) total health care costs were 17.68% lower in the treated cohort ($20,212 [$58,627]) than in the untreated cohort ($24,552 [$71,830]) over a whole year following the index influenza visit (P = .0203). CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral treatment in patients with T2D and influenza was associated with significantly lower HCRU and costs over at least 1 year after infection.

Demographics of and Costs to Users of Chiropractic Services in the United States with Neck or Back Pain not Meeting Guideline-Based Minimum Treatment Frequency Thresholds.

Context: Acceptance of chiropractic services as an effective therapy for neck or back pain has been well established with randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there have been limited observations made on the treatment frequency patterns seen in the real world. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify chiropractic users with neck or back pain who did not meet recommended treatment frequency guidelines and examine their demographics and chiropractic costs. Design: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, the nationally representative 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database was used. Setting: This study used nationally representative US survey data. Participants: Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of neck or back pain with one or more chiropractic visits in 2017. Outcomes Measures: Chiropractic utilization was categorized as concordant or discordant with treatment frequency guidelines; concordant was defined as 5 or more visits to a chiropractor within any 2-month time frame or at least 12 total visits during the year. Discordant was defined as circumstances not meeting concordant criteria. The groups were compared by demographics including age, sex, race, region, years of education, health insurance coverage, employment status, family income, presence of headache diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index score and the presence of any limitation of physical function. Comparisons were made between the two groups using Chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates. Results: There were 159 and 310 adults classified as concordant and discordant, respectively (weighted total: 1 849 108 [31.44%] and 4 032 541 [68.56%], with significantly different mean chiropractic costs of $2555 and $434, respectively. Significant independent predictors of discordant chiropractic utilization were race, years of education, family income and the presence of any limitation of physical function. Conclusions: Most chiropractic users with diagnosed neck or back pain were considered discordant with treatment frequency guidelines, which may indicate inefficiencies in treatment and inefficient use of healthcare resources.

Effect of inadequate care on diabetes complications and healthcare resource utilization during management of type 2 diabetes in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of inadequate type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) care on health outcomes, utilizing a model that incorporates patient, physician, and health-system factors. METHODS: The most recently available (years 2016-2018) Medical Expenditure panel survey longitudinal data was used to identify adults with type 2 diabetes who had received inadequate diabetes care. American Diabetes Association Standards of Diabetes guidelines were used to define inadequate care, resulting in five categories: lifestyle management, immunization, pharmacologic therapy, physical examination, and laboratory evaluation. For each of the five categories, propensity score 1:1 matching was used to match individuals who received inadequate care to similar individuals who did not. After matching, cohorts were followed for one year. The cohorts were compared by total healthcare expenditure change from baseline, total emergency healthcare visits change from baseline, total newly developed diabetes-related complications, and total days absent from school or work change from baseline. RESULTS: 1,619 adults with T2D, representing 15,781,346 individuals met study inclusion criteria, of which 22.60%, 22.80%, 49.21%, 23,93%, and 23,45% received inadequate lifestyle management, immunizations, pharmacologic therapies, physical examinations, and laboratory tests, respectively. After propensity score matching, those who had received inadequate care had increased healthcare expenditure change from baseline and more new diabetes-related complications in the following year. After adjusting for residual covariate imbalance, those that had received inadequate pharmacologic therapies had approximately 0.20 increased instances of emergency healthcare utilization and 0.10 increase in new diabetes-related complications. Those that had received inadequate laboratory tests had 0.26 additional increased instances emergency healthcare utilization. CONCLUSION: Inadequate T2D care is an extensive issue that may have substantial economic burden and may lead to increased diabetes-related complications. Those who did not receive medications or laboratory tests that were consistent with ADA guidelines had significantly increased emergency healthcare utilization in the following year. These findings highlight the importance of careful monitoring of T2D.