Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial; Randomised Evaluation of Assessment Methods (UPSTREAM) for diagnosis and management of bladder outlet obstruction in men: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) comprise storage symptoms, voiding symptoms and post-voiding symptoms. Prevalence and severity of LUTS increase with age and the progressive increase in the aged population group has emphasised the importance to our society of appropriate and effective management of male LUTS. Identification of causal mechanisms is needed to optimise treatment and uroflowmetry is the simplest non-invasive test of voiding function. Invasive urodynamics can evaluate storage function and voiding function; however, there is currently insufficient evidence to support urodynamics becoming part of routine practice in the clinical evaluation of male LUTS. DESIGN: A 2-arm trial, set in urology departments of at least 26 National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK), randomising men with bothersome LUTS for whom surgeons would consider offering surgery, between a care pathway based on urodynamic tests with invasive multichannel cystometry and a care pathway based on non-invasive routine tests. The aim of the trial is to determine whether a care pathway not including invasive urodynamics is no worse for men in terms of symptom outcome than one in which it is included, at 18 months after randomisation. This primary clinical outcome will be measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). We will also establish whether inclusion of invasive urodynamics reduces rates of bladder outlet surgery as a main secondary outcome. DISCUSSION: The general population has an increased life-expectancy and, as men get older, their prostates enlarge and potentially cause benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) which often requires surgery. Furthermore, voiding symptoms become increasingly prevalent, some of which may not be due to BPO. Therefore, as the population ages, more operations will be considered to relieve BPO, some of which may not actually be appropriate. Hence, there is sustained interest in the diagnostic pathway and this trial could improve the chances of an accurate diagnosis and reduce overall numbers of surgical interventions for BPO in the NHS. The morbidity, and therapy costs, of testing must be weighed against the cost saving of surgery reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com - ISRCTN56164274 (confirmed registration: 8 April 2014).

A safety and toxicity assessment of the administration of multiple intracerebral injections of irinotecan or doxorubicin drug-eluting beads.

OBJECTIVE Previous research in a rat glioma model has shown that the local intratumoral application of polymerbased drug-eluting beads (DEBs) loaded with doxorubicin or irinotecan suppress tumour growth and prolong survival. For translation into a clinical setting, the present experiment investigates in the healthy cat brain the local and systemic toxicity of a multiple injection shot technique. METHODS Three injection shots were placed, each at a 1 cm distance in the frontal lobe. The DEBs were suspended in an aqueous alginate excipient solution, which becomes subject to a sol-gel transition when injected into the Ca(2+)- rich brain tissue environment. Systemic and local side effects were monitored over a period of two weeks. Injection sites were histologically investigated. RESULTS Gelling of the alginate results in the permanent immobilisation of the microspheres at the implantation site. A distinct local cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin was found with intracerebral and intraventricular haemorrhages, and signs of brain tissue necrosis. In cats injected with irinotecan DEBs, such local adverse side effects did not occur. No signs of systemic toxicity were found with both chemotherapeutics. DISCUSSION We conclude that the multiple injection shot technique with irinotecan DEBs meets feasibility criteria and safety requirements for a clinical application.

The interface of medical devices and pharmaceuticals: Part II.

The technical challenges of developing combination products were addressed in Part I of this two part article. Part II reviews the preclinical tests and shelf-life testing that are required using drug eluting stents and drug eluting beads as examples. Regulatory considerations and ways to simplify development are also examined.