Disparities in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Eligibility for drug reimbursement associated with clinical outcomes.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an immunologic condition with an estimated prevalence of 0.1%. For CSU that is poorly controlled despite the use of antihistamines, omalizumab is the only treatment approved and recommended by international guidelines. Objective: Our aim was to outline the impact of treatment accessibility on CSU outcomes in the real world. Methods: Serial data on adult patients with CSU receiving care for at least 6 months at a dedicated, immunologist-led urticaria clinic at Grantham Hospital in Hong Kong between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients' clinicodemographic data, drug eligibility status (eligible for reimbursement or not), treatment step, and disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]) were collected and compared according to drug eligibility status. Results: This study included 238 patients, 80 (33.6%) of whom were eligible for reimbursement and 158 of whom were not. No significant clinicodemographic differences, including disease activity, were found at baseline. At latest follow-up, significantly more patients in the eligible group were receiving omalizumab (28.7% vs 5.7% [P < .001]), which is equivalent to a multivariate odds ratio of 9.35 (95% CI = 3.689-23.703 [P < .001]). The discrepancy persisted even in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU whose UAS7 was 16 or higher (40.6% [13 of 32] vs 10.2% [6 of 59]; P < .001). In addition, there was significantly less dose reduction (<300 mg every 4 weeks) in the eligible omalizumab users (4.3% vs 44.4% [P = .015]). Clinically, significantly greater improvements in UAS7 were reported by the eligible group (median change -8.0 vs -5.0 [P = .021]). Conclusion: Patterns of management varied largely among patients with different drug eligibility statuses and led to disparities in health outcomes. More efforts to secure equitable access to guideline-based CSU care are warranted.

Epidemiology, outcomes, and disproportionate burden of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis from the Hong Kong Multidisciplinary Anaphylaxis Management Initiative (HK-MAMI).

Background: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening allergic reaction that poses a considerable burden on populations across all ethnicities and age groups. The Hong Kong Multidisciplinary Anaphylaxis Management Initiative (HK-MAMI) was established to streamline the assessment of patients with anaphylaxis via a multidisciplinary and protocol-driven approach. Objective: This prospective study aims to define the etiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of patients with anaphylaxis in Hong Kong. Methods: Prospective clinical data from allergologic investigations from patients who completed evaluation by the HK-MAMI pathway between January 2017 and August 2022 were analyzed. Results: Of the 161 patients referred via the HK-MAMI, 131 (81.4%) met the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis. The median delay in diagnosis was 2 years (range 0-30 years). The majority of anaphylaxis cases were attributed to food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA), especially wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. In acute management settings, paired tryptase samples were taken in only around one-third of anaphylaxis cases, with 82.5% of the samples demonstrating significant elevation. There was a general underprescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, especially for food-related anaphylaxis. Patients with FDEIA had later ages of onset and diagnosis, and they presented with more cardiovascular manifestations. Skin prick tests and specific IgE level tests were able to diagnose 95% of FDEIA cases. Conclusion: Our study highlights the significant burden of FDEIA, and especially WDEIA, in Hong Kong, its association with severe presentations, and difficulties encountered in emergency or primary care settings. We advocate appropriate adrenaline use during acute-care management and discharge plans, as well as taking serum mast cell tryptase samples during acute episodes. Interdisciplinary collaboration remains crucial to upholding proper and optimized care for patients with anaphylaxis in Hong Kong.

Epidemiology, Management, and Treatment Access of Hereditary Angioedema in the Asia Pacific Region: Outcomes From an International Survey.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease with significant morbidity and mortality for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. Many Asia Pacific (AP) countries still lack access to diagnostic tests and evidence-based therapies. Epidemiologic data from the AP is needed to formulate regional guidelines to improve standards of care for HAE. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the estimated minimal prevalence, needs, and potential interventions for the diagnosis and management of HAE in the AP. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was distributed to representative experts from member societies of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. Patient profiles and the presence of diagnostic facilities or tests, regional and national HAE guidelines, and patient support groups were reported and compared. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 14 representatives of 12 member countries and territories, representing 46% of the world population. Overall minimal prevalence of HAE in the AP region was 0.02/100,000 population, with significant heterogeneity across different centers. Only one-half and one-third had registered on-demand and prophylactic medications, respectively. Few had patient support groups (58%) or regional guidelines (33%), and their existence was associated with the availability of HAE-specific medications. Availability of C1-inhibitor level testing was associated with a lower age at HAE diagnosis (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Hereditary angioedema in the AP differs from that in Western countries. Hereditary angioedema-specific medications were registered in only a minority of countries and territories, but those with patient support groups or regional guidelines were more likely to have better access. Asia Pacific-specific consensus and guidelines are lacking and urgently needed.

The Role of the Allergist in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Allergy Safety: A Pilot Study on a "Hub-and-Spoke" Model for Population-Wide Allergy Service.

BACKGROUND: Hong Kong started its coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination program in February 2021. A territory-wide Vaccine Allergy Safety (VAS) clinic was set up to assess individuals deemed at "higher risk" of COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A novel "hub-and-spoke" model was piloted to tackle the overwhelming demand of services by allowing nonallergists to conduct assessment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the VAS hub-and-spoke model for allergy assessment. METHODS: Records of patients attending the VAS hub-and-spoke Clinics between March and August 2021 were reviewed (n = 2725). We studied the overall results between the Hub (allergist led) and Spoke (nonallergist led) Clinics. The Hub and the Hong Kong West Cluster Spoke Clinic were selected for subgroup analysis as they saw the largest number of patients (n = 1411). RESULTS: A total of 2725 patients were assessed under the VAS hub-and-spoke model. Overall, 2324 patients (85.3%) were recommended to proceed with vaccination. Allergists recommended significantly more patients for vaccination than nonallergists (odds ratio = 21.58; P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that 881 of 1055 (83.5%) patients received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccination safely after assessment. Among those recommended vaccination, more patients assessed by allergists received their first dose of vaccination (odds ratio = 4.18; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The hub-and-spoke model has proven to be successful for the vaccination campaign. This study has illustrated the crucial role of allergists in countering vaccine hesitancy. Results from the study revealed considerable differences in outcomes between allergist-led and nonallergist-led clinics. Precise reasons for these differences warrant further evaluation. We are hopeful that the hub-and-spoke model can be similarly adapted for other allergist-integrative services in the future.

Drug allergy management in the elderly.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Drug allergy management has previously not been emphasized in the elderly. However, the geriatric population poses several unique characteristics, challenges for drug allergy testing and considerations in the management. Especially in the era of COVID-19, the elderly population is a vulnerable cohort and reviewing the management during this unprecedented time is both timely and relevant. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, larger scale studies focusing on the epidemiology and prevalence trends of drug allergies among older adults has been summarized in this review. Emphasis on anaphylaxis in the older adults has been studied. SUMMARY: There are many implications of these findings. Epidemiological studies are useful in realizing the burden and spectrum of drug allergies on our healthcare system. It has allowed us to identify certain barriers in drug allergy management and develop ways to overcome these challenges through. Lastly, we have proposed an approach to drug allergy management based on previous studies as well as from our perspective and local experience.