Metformin ameliorates calcium oxalate crystallization and stone formation by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway: Two birds with one stone.

Deposition of calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals and oxidative stress-induced injury of renal tubular epithelial cell are the primary pathogenic factors of nephrolithiasis. In this study we investigated the beneficial effects of metformin hydrochloride (MH) against nephrolithiasis and explored the underlying molecular mechanism. Our results demonstrated that MH inhibited the formation of CaOx crystals and promoted the transformation of thermodynamically stable CaOx monohydrate (COM) to more unstable CaOx dihydrate (COD). MH treatment effectively ameliorated oxalate-induced oxidative injury and mitochondrial damage in renal tubular cells and reduced CaOx crystal deposition in rat kidneys. MH also attenuated oxidative stress by lowering MDA level and enhancing SOD activity in HK-2 and NRK-52E cells and in a rat model of nephrolithiasis. In both HK-2 and NRK-52E cells, COM exposure significantlylowered the expressions of HO-1 and Nrf2, which was rescued by MH treatment even in the presence of Nrf2 and HO-1 inhibitors. In rats with nephrolithiasis, MH treatment significantly rescued the down-regulation of the mRNA and protein expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 in the kidneys. These results demonstrate that MH can alleviate CaOx crystal deposition and kidney tissue injury in rats with nephrolithiasis by suppressing oxidative stress and activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway, suggesting the potential value of MH in the treatment of nephrolithiasis.

Making Sense of MACRA: A Guide for Diagnostic Radiologists.

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 was signed into law on April 16, 2015, fundamentally altering the way clinicians are reimbursed for the treatment of Medicare patients starting in 2017. Under this new pay-for-performance model, reimbursement will be tied to multiple metrics related to quality and cost of care. A scaled scoring system will require providers to compete for positive reimbursement adjustments, while also penalizing poor performers with negative adjustments. A firm understanding of this new system will be essential for all physicians looking to maximize their reimbursement, particularly diagnostic radiologists and members of other highly focused fields where special considerations lead to alterations in the scoring system.