RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective somatic treatment, but it may be limited by cognitive adverse effects. The existing cognitive screening instruments often lack specificity to ECT-associated cognitive deficits. The ElectroConvulsive Therapy Cognitive Assessment was developed and validated in a clinical setting, but the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of ElectroConvulsive Therapy Cognitive Assessment (ECCA-C) have not been studied in a large clinical sample. METHODS: The ECCA-C and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were administered to patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing ECT at 3 time points: pretreatment (baseline), before the fifth treatment, and 1 week posttreatment. The instruments were also administered to a sample of healthy subjects. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with MDD and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited in this study. Overall, the patient group had statistically significantly lower MoCA and ECCA-C scores than the control group (both P values <0.001). The Cronbach α of the ECCA-C was 0.88 at baseline. Statistically significant decreases over time were observed in ECCA-C: pre-ECT (23.9 ± 4.0) > mid-ECT (21.3 ± 3.4) > post-ECT (18.7 ± 4.8) (all P values <0.001), whereas no statistically significant changes in MoCA scores were found at these 3 time points (F = 1.86, P = 0.165). A cutoff score of 26.5 on the ECCA-C was found to best differentiate between MDD patients and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The ECCA-C showed satisfactory psychometric properties and may be a more sensitive instrument than the MoCA to assess cognitive impairment associated with ECT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cognitive reserve (CR) is closely associated with cognitive and functional outcome, disease severity, progression and prognosis in psychiatric patients; however, it has not been extensively tested in mood disorders. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Reserve Assessment Scale in Health (CRASH) in mood disorder patients. METHODS: Altogether 166 subjects were recruited, 44 with major depressive disorder (MDD), 64 with bipolar disorder (BD), and 58 healthy controls. CR was assessed using the CRASH and the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire (CRQ). RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.779 for the CRASH. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.647-0.809). The optimal cut-off score of 51 generated the best combination of sensitivity (0.78) and specificity (0.43) for discriminating between patients with mood disorders and healthy controls. The CRASH score was highly correlated with the CRQ score in both mood disorder patients (rs = 0.586, P < 0.001) and healthy controls (rs = 0.627, P < 0.001), indicating acceptable convergent validity for the CRASH. Within the mood disorder sample, the CRASH score was associated with functional outcomes (FAST: rs = -0.243, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The CRASH is a useful tool to measure CR in mood disorder with acceptable psychometric properties and could be used in both research and clinical practice.