Risk of osteoporotic fracture in women using the FRAX tool with and without bone mineral density score in patients followed at a tertiary outpatient clinic ‒ An observational study

ABSTRACT Objectives: Fragility fractures increase morbidity and mortality. Adding assessment of clinical risk factors independently or as a previous step to Bone Densitometry (BD) should provide better accuracy in fracture risk prediction. FRAX tool might be used to stratify patients in order to rationalize the need for BD and risk classification. The primary objective of this study is to describe and perform comparisons between the estimated risk of fractures in 10 years using the FRAX calculator based on clinical factors with and without BD results for women aged 40 or more with clinical diseases monitored in tertiary care service in internal medicine. Methods: Cross-sectional. Women over 40 years with BD in the previous year. After medical chart review, identification of risk factors and risk estimations using FRAX-BRAZIL with (FRAX BDI) and without (FRAX BDNI) the inclusion of T-score. Results: 239 women. Age 65 ± 10.35 years. BMI 29.68 ± 6.27kg/m2. Risk factors: 32(13.4%) previous fractures; 23 (9.6%) current smoking; 78 (32.6%) corticosteroids use; 44 (18.4%) rheumatoid arthritis; 38 (15.9%) secondary causes; FRAX scores were higher when BD was not included. Spearman correlation coefficients between FRAX BDNI and FRAX BDI for major fractures r = 0.793 (95% CI 0.7388‒0.836). For hip fractures r = 0.6922 (95% CI 0.6174‒0.75446) Conclusion: Using FRAX to estimate 10-year fracture risk without BD data might be a reliable tool for screening, even for patients with a high prevalence of risk factors, improving accessibility and equity in health systems. The present study's data suggest an overestimation of fracture risk with FRAX BDNI, suggesting that it is safe to be widely used as a screening tool.

Laboratory Tests Ordering Pattern by Medical Residents From a Brazilian University Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: The adequacy of laboratory test orders by medical residents is a longstanding issue. The aim of this study is to analyze the number, types, and pattern of repetition of tests ordered by medical residents. METHODS: We studied all tests ordered over a 1-year period for inpatients of an internal medicine ward in a university hospital. Types, results, and repetition pattern of tests were analyzed in relation to patients' diagnoses. RESULTS: We evaluated 117,666 tests, requested for 1,024 inpatients. The mean number of tests was 9.5 per day. The test repetition pattern was similar, regardless of patients' diagnoses, previous test results, or duration of stay. The probability of an abnormal result after a sequence of three normal tests was lower than 25%, regardless of the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Number of tests and repetition were both high, imposing costs, discomfort, and risks to patients, thus warranting further investigation.

Rational use of blood calcium determinations.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: This study was motivated by the recent excessive increase in requests for blood calcium determinations and laboratory tests in general, in the Hospital das Clínicas complex of Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP). Its aim was to suggest rules for the determination of total and ionized calcium in our intensive care units, emergency department, wards and outpatient services, thus contributing towards improving the quality of medical care and achieving more appropriate use of human and financial resources. DESIGN AND SETTING: Critical analysis on clinical and laboratory data and the pertinent scientific literature, conducted by the study group for rational clinical laboratory use, which is part of the Central Laboratory Division, HCFMUSP. METHODS: The study group reviewed scientific publications, statistics and clinical and laboratory data concerning requests for total and ionized calcium determinations in the settings of intensive care units, emergency department, wards and outpatient services. RESULTS: From this critical analysis, clinical decision flow diagrams aimed at providing guidance for ordering these tests were constructed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the proposed flow diagrams may help to limit the numbers of inappropriate requests for ionized and total calcium determinations, with consequent reductions in the number of tests, risks to patients and unnecessary costs.

Rational use of blood calcium determinations / Uso racional da dosagem de cálcio no sangue

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: This study was motivated by the recent excessive increase in requests for blood calcium determinations and laboratory tests in general, in the Hospital das Clínicas complex of Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP). Its aim was to suggest rules for the determination of total and ionized calcium in our intensive care units, emergency department, wards and outpatient services, thus contributing towards improving the quality of medical care and achieving more appropriate use of human and financial resources. DESIGN AND SETTING: Critical analysis on clinical and laboratory data and the pertinent scientific literature, conducted by the study group for rational clinical laboratory use, which is part of the Central Laboratory Division, HCFMUSP. METHODS: The study group reviewed scientific publications, statistics and clinical and laboratory data concerning requests for total and ionized calcium determinations in the settings of intensive care units, emergency department, wards and outpatient services. RESULTS: From this critical analysis, clinical decision flow diagrams aimed at providing guidance for ordering these tests were constructed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the proposed flow diagrams may help to limit the numbers of inappropriate requests for ionized and total calcium determinations, with consequent reductions in the number of tests, risks to patients and unnecessary costs. .

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Este trabalho foi motivado pelo recente aumento excessivo de solicitações de dosagem de cálcio no sangue, assim como de exames laboratoriais em geral, no complexo do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP). Seu objetivo foi sugerir regras para a determinação de cálcio total e iônico nas nossas unidades de terapia intensiva, pronto-socorro, enfermarias e ambulatórios e contribuir para a melhoria da qualidade da assistência médica, com utilização mais adequada dos recursos humanos e financeiros. TIPO DO ESTUDO E LOCAL: Análise crítica de dados clínicos, laboratoriais e da literatura médica pertinente, realizada pelo grupo de estudos para o uso racional do laboratório clínico, vinculado à Divisão de Laboratório Central do HCFMUSP. MÉTODOS: O grupo de estudos reviu publicações científicas, estatísticas e dados clínico-laboratoriais relativos às solicitações de cálcio total e iônico nos ambientes das unidades de terapia intensiva, prontos-socorros, enfermarias e ambulatórios. RESULTADOS: A partir dessa análise crítica, foram construídos fluxogramas de decisão clínica que visam orientar a requisição desses testes. CONCLUSÕES: A utilização dos fluxogramas propostos pode ajudar a limitar a solicitação inadequada das dosagens de cálcio total e iônico, com consequente redução do número de exames, de riscos para os pacientes e de custos desnecessários. .

Venous thromboembolism risk assessment in hospitalised patients: a new proposal.

OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional studies have been conducted to evaluate the adequacy of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. However, these studies often evaluate prophylaxis on the data collection day, without analysing the prophylactic dose or duration and without reference to inappropriate use in patients without risk. A prospective, observational study was performed to assess the adequacy of prophylaxis in a general medicine ward of a university hospital. METHOD: In the analysis, the use of the proper prophylactic dose at the correct time, the use in patients with contraindications, and the misuse in patients without risk of venous thromboembolism were considered. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 104 (42.4%) were considered to be at risk, and 82.7% either received adequate prophylaxis (i.e., the correct dose at the right time) or did not receive prophylaxis because it was contraindicated. Among the 141 patients who were not at risk, 81 (57.4%) incorrectly received prophylaxis, the majority (61/81) of whom presented with risk factors but did not demonstrate reduced mobility. Among the entire group, only 59.6% of patients were properly treated. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of prophylaxis adequacy should consider not only whether the correct dose is administered at the correct time but also whether it is used in patients with contraindications and whether it is inappropriately administered to patients who are not at risk.

Venous thromboembolism risk assessment in hospitalised patients: A new proposal

OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional studies have been conducted to evaluate the adequacy of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. However, these studies often evaluate prophylaxis on the data collection day, without analysing the prophylactic dose or duration and without reference to inappropriate use in patients without risk. A prospective, observational study was performed to assess the adequacy of prophylaxis in a general medicine ward of a university hospital. METHOD: In the analysis, the use of the proper prophylactic dose at the correct time, the use in patients with contraindications, and the misuse in patients without risk of venous thromboembolism were considered. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 104 (42.4%) were considered to be at risk, and 82.7% either received adequate prophylaxis (i.e., the correct dose at the right time) or did not receive prophylaxis because it was contraindicated. Among the 141 patients who were not at risk, 81 (57.4%) incorrectly received prophylaxis, the majority (61/81) of whom presented with risk factors but did not demonstrate reduced mobility. Among the entire group, only 59.6% of patients were properly treated. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of prophylaxis adequacy should consider not only whether the correct dose is administered at the correct time but also whether it is used in patients with contraindications and whether it is inappropriately administered to patients who are not at risk. .

Risk-assessment algorithm and recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients.

UNLABELLED: The risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical patients is high, but risk assessment is rarely performed because there is not yet a good method to identify candidates for prophylaxis. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review about VTE risk factors (RFs) in hospitalized medical patients and generate recommendations (RECs) for prophylaxis that can be implemented into practice. DATA SOURCES: A multidisciplinary group of experts from 12 Brazilian Medical Societies searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and LILACS. STUDY SELECTION: Two experts independently classified the evidence for each RF by its scientific quality in a standardized manner. A risk-assessment algorithm was created based on the results of the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Several VTE RFs have enough evidence to support RECs for prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (eg, increasing age, heart failure, and stroke). Other factors are considered adjuncts of risk (eg, varices, obesity, and infections). According to the algorithm, hospitalized medical patients > or =40 years-old with decreased mobility, and > or =1 RFs should receive chemoprophylaxis with heparin, provided they don't have contraindications. High prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight-heparin must be administered and maintained for 6-14 days. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary group generated evidence-based RECs and an easy-to-use algorithm to facilitate VTE prophylaxis in medical patients.