Examining racial disparities in utilization rate and perioperative outcomes following knee and hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Previous arthroplasty utilization research predominantly examined Black and White populations within the US. This is the first known study to examine utilization and complications in poorly studied minority racial groups such as Asians and Native Hawaiian/Pacific-Islanders (NHPI) as compared to Whites. RESULTS: Data from 3304 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients (2011 to 2019) were retrospectively collected, involving 1789 Asians (52.2%), 1164 Whites (34%) and 320 Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (NHPI) (9.3%). The 2012 arthroplasty utilization rates for Asian, White, and NHPI increased by 32.5%, 11.2%, and 86.5%, respectively, by 2019. Compared to Asians, Whites more often underwent hip arthroplasty compared to knee arthroplasty (odds ratio (OR) 1.755; p < 0.001). Compared to Asians, Whites and NHPI more often received total knee compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (White: OR 1.499; NHPI: OR 2.013; p < 0.001). White patients had longer hospitalizations (2.66 days) compared to Asians (2.19 days) (p = 0.005) following bilateral procedures. Medicare was the most common insurance for Asians (66.2%) and Whites (54.2%) while private insurance was most common for NHPI (49.4%). Compared to Asians, economic status was higher for Whites (White OR 0.695; p < 0.001) but lower for NHPI (OR 1.456; p < 0.001). After controlling for bilateral procedures, NHPI had a lower risk of transfusion compared to Asians (OR 0.478; p < 0.001) and Whites had increased risk of wound or systemic complications compared to Asians (OR 2.086; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Despite NHPI demonstrating a significantly poorer health profile and lower socioeconomic status, contrary to previous literature involving minority racial groups, no significant overall differences in arthroplasty utilization rates or perioperative complications could be demonstrated amongst the racial groups examined.

Gout in Native Hawaiian Patients in Hawai'i: Clinical Characteristics and Disparities.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in clinical characteristics and health care use of Native Hawaiian and White patients with gout. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of Native Hawaiian and White patients with gout treated from 2011 to 2017 within a large health care system in Hawai'i. We compared demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and risk factors for gout. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictive factors of emergency department visits. RESULTS: We identified 270 Native Hawaiian patients with gout and 239 White patients with gout. The Native Hawaiian patients were younger on average (54.0 vs 64.0 years; P < 0.0001) and had an earlier onset of disease (50.0 vs 57.0 years; P < 0.0001). Native Hawaiian patients with gout had higher mean (7.58 vs 6.87 mg/dL; P < 0.0001) and maximum (10.30 vs 9.50 mg/dL; P < 0.0001) serum urate levels compared to White patients with gout. Native Hawaiian patients with gout also had a greater number of tophi (median 2.00 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001). Native Hawaiians patients with gout were 2.7 times more likely to have frequent (≥1) emergency department visits than White patients with gout. Native Hawaiian patients with gout were less likely to have a therapeutic serum urate ≤6.0 mg/dL and had lower rates of rheumatology specialty care. CONCLUSION: Native Hawaiian patients have a higher disease burden of gout, with earlier disease onset and more tophi. Native Hawaiian patients with gout are more likely to use emergency services for gout and have lower rates of rheumatology specialty care compared to White patients. Future studies are needed to promote culturally appropriate preventive care and management of gout in Native Hawaiians.

Osteoporotic hip fracture mortality and associated factors in Hawai'i.

The 30-day mortality of osteoporotic hip fracture patients ≥ 50 years at Hawai'i Pacific Health (2015-2016) was 4.2%. Mortality increased to 17.1% (1 year), 24.5% (2 years), and 30.1% (3 years). Increased age, male sex, higher CCI score, primary insurance status-Medicare/Medicaid, and lower BMI were associated with increased mortality. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate mortality and factors associated with mortality of osteoporotic hip fracture patients at community hospitals within a large healthcare system in Hawai'i. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 428 patients, ≥ 50 years, and hospitalized for a osteoporotic hip fracture from January 2015 to May 2016 within a large healthcare system in Hawai'i. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and treatment were collected from retrospective chart review. We determined the date of death by review of medical records and online public obituary records. We calculated 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year mortality after discharge for hip fracture admission. Multivariable logistic regression and proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate associations between variables and the mortality of the patients. RESULTS: The 30-day and 90-day mortality after admission for hip fracture were 4.2% and 8.6%. One-year mortality, 2-year mortality, and 3-year mortality were 17.1%, 24.5%, and 30.1%, respectively. Through proportional hazards regression, older age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06, p < 0.001), high comorbidity load (HR = 1.30, p < 0.001), and primary insurance status-Medicare/Medicaid (HR = 3.78, p = 0.021) were associated with increased mortality, while female sex (HR = 0.54, p < 0.001) and higher BMI (HR = 0.94, p = 0.002) were associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSION: After admission for osteoporotic hip fracture, the 30-day mortality was 4.2%. At 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years, mortality increased to 17.1%, 24.5%, and 30.1%, respectively. Increased age, male sex, higher Charlson comorbidity index score, primary insurance status-Medicare/Medicaid, and lower body mass index were associated with increased mortality.

Patterns of health care utilization of gout patients in Hawai'i-high rates of emergency department utilization as compared to rheumatoid arthritis.

Recent and comprehensive research of gout in the Pacific region and Hawai'i is significantly lacking. This study was conducted to improve the understanding of the healthcare utilization of gout patients within a single health care system in Hawai'i. The objective was to examine gout inpatient, outpatient and emergency department care within a single health care system in Hawai'i. This study was a retrospective chart review of patients, ≥ 18 years admitted to three Hawai'i Pacific Health facilities for a primary diagnosis of gout or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 2011 to 2017. Population data for the State of Hawai'i was used to calculate visit rates per 1,000 Hawai'i adults. Trend analysis was performed to compare changes over time. We studied gout health care utilization concurrently with RA to provide an internal comparison group for the healthcare utilization patterns of interest. Gout patients were primarily managed in the outpatient setting with high rates of emergency department visits. In contrast, RA patients were primarily managed in the outpatient setting, with low rates of emergency department visits. Both gout and RA patients had low rates of inpatient admissions. The cost of gout emergency department visits was approximately 3.4 times higher than gout outpatient visits. The rates for gout emergency department visits, outpatient visits, inpatients visits, and RA outpatient visits in 2017 were trending downward and significantly changed from 2011 (p <0.05). The rates for RA emergency department visits and inpatient visits were not significantly changed from 2011-2017. Gout care in Hawai'i remains suboptimal with higher rates of emergency department visits, as compared to RA. Because emergency department visits are associated with higher cost, efforts should be made to reduce these emergency department visits to improve the quality of care.

Challenges in Optimizing Medical Education for Rheumatologists.

The field of rheumatology has expanded rapidly in recent years, and innovations in immunology, epigenetics, and bone metabolism continue at an astonishing pace. In this fast changing field, optimizing medical education for rheumatologists is vital for maintaining a competent workforce to meet the needs of patients with rheumatic diseases. Several key challenges lie ahead and efforts to optimize medical education for rheumatologists are discussed in this article.