Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Relationship with Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Conversion to Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered a prodromal state of dementia. Abnormal values of cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarkers (CSF-AD-b) have been associated with a higher risk of conversion to dementia (due to Alzheimer's disease), but studies evaluating the ability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in this task are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the relationship between MoCA and CSF-AD-b, as well as the ability of those tools to predict conversion to dementia. METHODS: Taking advantage of our MCI cohort with biological characterization on longitudinal follow-up (180 patients followed for 62.6 months during which 41.3% converted), we computed MoCA and MMSE z-scores, using Portuguese normative data. The performance in MoCA z-score was correlated with CSF-AD-b and the relative time to conversion and risk according to baseline characteristics were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. RESULTS: MoCA z-scores were correlated with Aß42 (p = 0.026), t-tau (p = 0.033), and p-tau (p = 0.01). Impaired MMSE (p < 0.001) and MoCA z-scores (p = 0.019), decreased Aß42 (p < 0.001) and increased t-tau (p < 0.001) and p-tau (p < 0.001) were associated with shorter estimated time of conversion. Aß42 (p < 0.001) and MMSE z-scores (p = 0.029) were independent predictors of conversion. For those with at least 9 years of education, MoCA z-score (p = 0.004) (but not MMSE) was an independent predictor of conversion as well as Aß42. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the role of CSF-AD-b, namely Aß42, in predicting conversion from MCI to dementia and suggests the utility of MoCA in predicting conversion in highly educated subjects, supporting its use in the evaluation of MCI patients.

Neuropsychological Assessment in the Distinction Between Biomarker Defined Frontal-Variant of Alzheimer's Disease and Behavioral-Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Frontal-variant of Alzheimer's disease (fvAD) was purposed for patients with AD pathology that, despite the typical amnestic presentation, show early and progressive deterioration of behavior and executive functions, closely resembling the behavioral-variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). This leads to a challenging differential diagnosis where neuropsychological evaluation and in vivo pathological evidence are essential. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment (NP) battery in distinguishing between fvAD-dementia and bvFTD supported by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. METHODS: We included 40 patients with a baseline NP profile with prominent early executive and/or behavioral dysfunction, who meet both diagnosis of bvFTD and fvAD-dementia, according to international criteria. All patients underwent comprehensive NP assessment and CSF-AD biomarker evaluation. Neuropsychological domains as well as clinical and sociodemographic features, and APOE genotype were compared between groups. RESULTS: 21 patients (52.5%) met the biological criteria for AD (decreased Aß42 together with increased T-tau or P-tau in CSF) and were therefore classified as fvAD (mean age was 64.57, with 47.6% female). There were no differences between groups regarding age/age-at-onset, gender, or educational level. Regarding neuropsychological profile, performances in language and memory functions were equivalent in both groups. Significant differences were found in visuo-constructional abilities (p = 0.004), Trail Making Test A (p < 0.001), and Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (p = 0.019), with fvAD patients showing worst performances. CONCLUSION: In patients with an early prominent frontal profile, a higher impairment in attention and visuo-spatial functions, signaling additional right hemisphere fronto-parietal dysfunction, point towards a diagnosis of fvAD-dementia and may be useful in clinical practice.