Influenza vaccination coverage at community pharmacies: Positioning, needs, expectations and involvement of community pharmacists in the Franche-Comté region.

INTRODUCTION: Influenza vaccination coverage currently remains below the 75% recommended threshold by the World Health Organization. To correct this situation, experiments have been successively carried out in France to enable community pharmacists to vaccinate at-risk populations. In this context, a study was conducted with pharmacists from the French Franche-Comté region to evaluate their positioning, needs and expectations regarding influenza vaccination at community pharmacies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was created and sent to licensed pharmacists in March of 2018. This consisted of 4 parts: characteristics of the community pharmacy; positioning of the pharmacist regarding vaccinations carried out at the pharmacy; training needs and expectations; and willingness to implement vaccinations. RESULTS: The participation rate in this survey was 32% (137/427). More than 90% of the pharmacists agreed that community pharmacies' assets were adequate for the implementation of these vaccinations (accessibility and availability), although 52% considered this complicated. Their main fears were reluctance from patients and conflicts of interest with other health professionals authorized to vaccinate (58%). The needs and expectations regarding pharmacy student training were essential for 94% of them as well as continuous training of practicing pharmacists (96%). The willingness of pharmacists to vaccinate stemmed from the fact that influenza vaccination coverage would increase for at-risk subjects (36%). CONCLUSION: This survey allowed us to assess the favorable positioning and the real interest of pharmacists from Franche-Comté regarding the influenza vaccination done at community pharmacies, given the proviso that they were given relevant training and allocated adequate resources.

[Retrocession, a risk area in care pathway]. / Les rétrocessions, une zone à risque dans le parcours des patients.

OBJECTIVES: Medication errors are common at transitions points in care pathway. The pharmacist can secure patient care in "retrocession" (dispensing specific drugs by hospital pharmacy to outpatient) due to his prescription analysis (both regulatory and pharmacotherapeutic). The "retrocession" is a risk area in care pathway. The objective of this study is to evaluate iatrogenic and economic risks in "retrocession" dispense by identifying pharmaceutical interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study performed during 8months in university hospital. All the prescriptions have been analyzed and divided into 3 categories: "first prescription" (a new prescription for a new treatment or a new patient), continued therapy with new prescription and prescription renewal. Therapeutic optimizations and regulatory pharmaceutical interventions performed have been systematically recorded. RESULTS: Among 7166 prescriptions analyzed, 161 pharmaceutical interventions (2.2%) are done. The highest rate of therapeutic optimizations and regulatory pharmaceutical interventions concern the "first prescription" category (9.3%). The most involved drugs in medication errors on a "first prescription" are cancer drugs (36%) and anti-infectives (24%). CONCLUSION: The first dispensation in "retrocession" is the riskiest step, especially with pharmacotherapeutic intervention. Thanks to pharmacist counseling sessions, especially in oncology, this risk is better controlled. This study demonstrates the interest of developing pharmacist counseling sessions for the treatment's introduction regardless of therapeutic class.

PRODIG (Prevention of new onset diabetes after transplantation by a short term treatment of Vildagliptin in the early renal post-transplant period) study: study protocol for a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant diabetes is a frequent and serious complication of kidney transplantation. There is currently no treatment to prevent or delay the disease. Nevertheless, identification of risk factors make it possible to target a population at risk of developing de novo diabetes. We hypothesized that a short-term treatment with vildagliptin may prevent new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) in high-risk patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Patients undergoing first kidney transplantation will be included from ten French transplant centers. Included patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either vildagliptin 100 or 50 mg/day (depending on glomerular filtration rate) during 2 months (the first dose being administered before entering the operating theatres) or placebo. Additional antidiabetic therapy could be administered according to glycemic control. The primary outcome is the proportion of diabetic patients 1 year after transplantation, defined as patients receiving a diabetic treatment, or having a fasting glucose above 7 mmol/l, and/or with an abnormal oral glucose tolerance test. Secondary outcomes include glycated hemoglobin, the occurrence of acute rejection, infection, graft loss and patient death at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after transplantation. Outcomes will be correlated to clinical and general characteristics of the patient, cardiovascular history, nephropathy, dialysis history, transplantation data, biological data, health-related quality of life, and the cost-effectiveness of prevention of diabetes with vildagliptin. DISCUSSION: We have scarce data on the pharmacological prevention of post-transplant diabetes. If our hypothesis is verified, our results will have a direct application in clinical practice and could limit diabetes-associated morbidity, reduce cardiovascular complications, increase quality of life of renal transplant patients, and consequently promote graft and patient survival. Our results may possibly serve for non-transplant patients carrying a high-risk of diabetes associated with other co-morbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02849899 . Registered on 8 February 2016.

Economic impact of prescribing error prevention with computerized physician order entry of injectable antineoplastic drugs.

UNLABELLED: A cost-benefit analysis was carried out to determine the potential economic costs and benefits of pharmaceutical analysis in preventing prescribing errors for full standardized injectable antineoplastic drugs computerized physician order entry, in a pharmaceutical unit (University teaching hospital), compared with theoretical setting with no pharmaceutical analysis. The viewpoint is that of the payer or the French national Public Health Insurance system, and is limited to hospital cost (only direct medical costs related to net cost and net benefit. A decision analysis model was performed to compare two strategies: with pharmaceutical analysis (± pharmacy intervention) and without pharmaceutical analysis. RESULTS: are expressed in terms of benefit-to-cost ratio and total benefit. The robustness of the results was assessed through a series of one-way sensitivity analyses. Over 1 year, prescribing error incidence was estimated at 1.5% [1.3-1.7], i.e. 218 avoided prescribing errors. Potential avoidance of hospital stay was estimated at 419 days or 1.9 ± 0.3 days per prescribing error. Cost-benefit analysis could estimate a net benefit-to-cost ratio of 33.3 (€17.34/€0.52) and a total benefit at €16.82 per pharmaceutical analysis or €249,844 per year. The sensitivity analysis showed robustness of results. Our study shows a substantial economic benefit of pharmaceutical analysis and intervention in the prevention of prescribing errors. The clinical pharmacist adds both value and economic benefit, making it possible to avoid additional use of expensive antineoplastic drugs and hospitalization. Computerized physician order entry of antineoplastic drugs improves the relevance of clinical pharmacist interventions, expanding pharmaceutical analysis and also the role of the pharmacist.

[Antibiotics in elderly patients: Impact of clinical practice evaluation]. / Antibiothérapie chez le sujet âgé : impact d'une démarche d'évaluation des pratiques professionnelles.

OBJECTIVE: Improving the use of antimicrobial drugs is a national objective. To this end an evaluation of clinical practice was implemented on prescribed antibiotics in elderly patients, in the Besançon Teaching Hospital. DESIGN: In 2005, a clinical audit compared the adequacy of antibiotic prescriptions to national guidelines in 37 patients. An improvement plan was implemented, including the drafting of local guidelines (adapted national guidelines) "Antibiotic prescription in elderly patients" by a multidisciplinary team. The Antibiotics Committee approved it. A retrospective study compared antibiotic prescription of 62 patients to these guidelines. The methodology was based on Gyssen's algorithm. The assessment criteria were: relevance of the indication, absence of a better alternative, respect of recommended dose, duration, and timing. RESULTS: The rate of overall conformity was 26% in 2005, 57% in 2007. Antibiotic choice was adequate in 61% of cases in 2005, 78% in 2007. In 63% of cases, a more efficient alternative was advised in 2005, 10% of cases in 2007. Treatment duration, dose, and timing were adequate in 54 - 92 - 96% in 2005 respectively and 86 - 92 - 100% of cases in 2007. Ciprofloxacin was prescribed in first line for 42% of urinary infections in 2005, 0% in 2007. CONCLUSIONS: This approach improved antibiotic prescriptions because of better guideline observance by physicians. The main improvement concerned fluoroquinolones. It should be continued to confirm antibiotic good use and protect our hospital bacterial ecology.

[Clinical audit on the use of expensive systemic antifungals in the Besançon University Hospital]. / Audit clinique des prescriptions d'antifongiques systémiques couteux au centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon.

UNLABELLED: The continuous improvement policy for healthcare quality requires practice evaluation. The principle of a clinical audit is to compare practice to guidelines. Prescription guidelines on antifungal agent use has been available in our hospital since 2003. It was updated in 2005 and 2006. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess compliance to guidelines, with an audit of prescriptions: amphotericin B lipid formulation, voriconazole and caspofungin, expensive antifungals concerned by the budget allowance correlated to activity, subject to supplementary reimbursement to the coded Homogeneous Group of Diseases. METHOD: The assessment criteria were: relevance of the indication, absence of a better alternative, complying to recommended dosage, loading dose and timing. This retrospective study dealt with all prescriptions of all departments, from January to May 2007. RESULTS: Hundred and eighteen prescriptions were retrospectively analyzed for 81 patients. The rate of overall conformity was 54%. Antifungal therapy was justified for 113 prescriptions (96%). In 30% of the cases, a more efficient alternative was advised, cheaper or less toxic. The dosage and the charge dosing were right in 92% and 80% of the cases respectively. CONCLUSION: This audit allowed assessing good-use of antifungals. We showed an over-prescription of caspofungin and sometimes insufficient regimen of voriconazole dosages for children. Reporting these audit results and development of new international guidelines stress the need to update local recommendations regularly.

Hospital costs of renal transplant management.

Renal transplantation is considered to be a cost-effective therapy, but hospital medical costs are not accurately known. The aim of this work was to evaluate the costs of hospital stay for renal transplantation. This retrospective study included all patients who underwent renal transplantation between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2005, in our University hospital. The incurred costs were determined using our center's analytical accounting (AA). The mean local cost was then compared with the median national cost of hospitalization for renal transplantation, based on a sample of participating centers contributing to the National Cost Scale (NCS) per homogenous diagnosis-related group (DRG). These mean costs were weighed against the financing obtained by national rates of the case-mix based payment system (termed T2A). Data were collected from 77 patients. Their mean length of stay was 19.4 days. AA determined the cost of management to be euro14,100 per patient. National economic approaches were significantly higher: euro16,389 for NCS and euro17,369 for national rates. Thus, the specific DRG rate (case mix index) of renal transplantation covers the expenses incurred by our center. These results are rather interesting; however, it is unlike those obtained for the management of other diseases such as acute myeloid leukemia, where T2A underestimates the actual cost by 2-4 times. Last, the hospital budget and T2A must be considered as a whole. The fact that DRGs with favorable and unfavorable pricing balance out should be taken into account.

Effect of cell determinant (CD)34+ cell dose on the cost and consequences of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients in front-line therapy.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of cell determinant (CD)34+ cell dose on the cost and consequences of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients in front-line therapy. Resource utilisation, length of aplasia, overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were assessed for 63 patients. Economic data were calculated taking into account harvest, hospitalisation, blood product requirements and drugs required until discharge. The point of view of the Hospital Institution was chosen. A significantly earlier haematopoietic engraftment was achieved in patients with a count of more than 5 x 10(6) CD34+/kg. There were no differences for OS and EFS. A high CD34+ cell content resulted in a total cost saving of $4210. This was principally related to a significant reduction in the length of hospitalisation (-$3010) and platelet and red blood cell transfusions (-$815), although the latter was not significant. Several sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of our results. A CD34+ cell dose higher than 5 x 10(6)/kg appeared to be optimal for clinical and economic considerations in NHL patients undergoing transplantation in front-line therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of CD34+ dose in peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a single centre study.

Intensive high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation is a common strategy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of CD34+ cell dose was carried out. Between 1994 and 1998, 28 patients were included. Efficacy was measured by the length of aplasia. Data collection concerned the period from graft day until discharge from hospital, and the post-graft period until graft day +100. Patients transplanted using a cell dose greater than 5 x 106/kg were found to have a faster hematological recovery. Average length of post-graft hospitalization was shorter and fewer blood products were required for patients with more than 5 x 106/kg CD34+ cells transplanted. Hospitalization was the major cost driver. A large reduction in procedure cost was obtained with a CD34+ cell count higher than 5 x 106/kg (-US$2740, -11%). This difference was directly related to hospitalization (-US$860) and platelet units transfused (-US$1,340). A sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of results. Our findings indicated that a CD34+ cell dose higher than 5 x 106/kg was more cost-effective than a lower dose in NHL patients. The collection of 5 x 106/kg CD34+ cells appeared necessary to optimize the PBPC procedure.

Erythropoietin and preoperative autologous blood donation in the prevention of hepatitis C infection: necessity or luxury?

BACKGROUND: Prevention of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion during surgery is an important financial issue when recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is used in addition to preoperative blood donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of rHuEPO in preoperative blood donation in orthopedic surgery. The study, based on a decision tree analysis of the use of rHuEPO, was conducted from the perspective of the French health care system. The efficacy criterion was the number of hepatitis C infections prevented. The decision tree analysis was constructed as follows: the residual risk of hepatitis C infection was 8.26 per million units transfused, and the chance node was defined according to the number of units transfused. RESULTS: With the use of rHuEPO in preoperative blood donation, 0.30562 cases of hepatitis C infection per 100,000 patients were prevented. The incremental cost of one prevented hepatitis C infection amounted to $888,000,000 (US). CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of our model, the cost-effectiveness ratio was so large that variations only slightly modified the size of the result. From the societal perspective, it was not cost-effective to add rHuEPO to preoperative blood donation.

Cost comparative study of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and bone marrow (ABM) transplantations for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.

Intensive high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support has become a common treatment strategy for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. A cost-identification analysis was conducted comparing 10 patients autografted with PBSC to 10 others autografted with BM. The analysis included harvest and graft until graft day +100 and was carried out from the point of view of the hospital setting. Resources used, logistic and direct medical costs per patient were identified, and sensitivity analyses performed. The cost distribution was different. Stem cell harvest was more expensive for PBPC ($9030) and BM ($4745); on the other hand, hospitalization from graft to discharge from hospital cost savings with PBSC were about $10666. After discharge from hospital, costs were similar and cheaper in both groups. For the overall study the PBPC procedure was less expensive than ABMT, $35381 and $41759 respectively, with cost savings of $6378. The number of days spent in hospital and blood bank costs were the major cost factors. This study was based on a single pathology, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and the actual hospital records for each patient situation as opposed to a clinical trial, and our results were consistent with different previous studies carried out in different health care systems.