Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 9(2): e0105921, 2021 10 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34704832

RESUMO

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and has since caused a global pandemic resulting in millions of cases and deaths. Diagnostic tools and serological assays are critical for controlling the outbreak, especially assays designed to quantitate neutralizing antibody levels, considered the best correlate of protection. As vaccines become increasingly available, it is important to identify reliable methods for measuring neutralizing antibody responses that correlate with authentic virus neutralization but can be performed outside biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories. While many neutralizing assays using pseudotyped virus have been developed, there have been few studies comparing the different assays to each other as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization. Here, we characterized three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and three pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) neutralization assays and assessed their concordance with authentic virus neutralization. The most accurate assays for predicting authentic virus neutralization were luciferase- and secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralizations, followed by green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralization, and then the ELISAs. IMPORTANCE The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Prior infection or vaccination can be detected by the presence of antibodies in the blood. Antibodies in the blood are also considered to be protective against future infections from the same virus. The "gold standard" assay for detecting protective antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, this assay can only be performed under highly restrictive biocontainment conditions. We therefore characterized six antibody-detecting assays for their correlation with authentic virus neutralization. The significance of our research is in outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the different assays and identifying the optimal surrogate assay for authentic virus neutralization. This will allow for more accurate assessments of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 following infection and vaccination.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Testes de Neutralização/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Domínios Proteicos/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Vírus da Estomatite Vesicular Indiana/imunologia , Vírus da Estomatite Vesicular New Jersey/imunologia
2.
Virology ; 508: 159-163, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549236

RESUMO

During December 2003 and March 2004, large scale epidemics of low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H5N2 occurred in poultry farms in central and southern Taiwan. Based on genomic analysis, these H5N2 viruses contain HA and NA genes of American-lineage H5N2 viruses and six internal genes from avian influenza A/H6N1 viruses endemic in poultry in Taiwan. After disappearing for several years, these novel influenza H5N2 viruses caused outbreaks in poultry farms again in 2008, 2010 and 2012, and have evolved into high pathogenic AI (HPAI) since 2010. Moreover, asymptomatic infections of influenza H5N2 were detected serologically in poultry workers in 2012. Therefore, we evaluated antigenicity and pathogenicity of the novel H5N2 viruses in ferrets. We found that no significant antigenic difference was detected among the novel H5N2 viruses isolated from 2003 to 2014 and the novel H5N2 viruses could cause mild infections in ferrets. Monitoring zoonotic transmission of the novel H5N2 viruses is necessary.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N2/patogenicidade , Influenza Aviária/virologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/virologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Galinhas , Feminino , Furões , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N2/genética , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N2/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Aviária/sangue , Influenza Aviária/epidemiologia , Influenza Aviária/patologia , Masculino , Filogenia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/sangue , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/patologia , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Virulência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA