Factors Influencing Health Promotion Lifestyle in Female Breast Cancer Survivors: The Role of Health Behavior Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the factors influencing health-promoting lifestyles and the changes in health behavior self-efficacy and health-promoting lifestyles among female breast cancer survivors over a 6-month period. METHODS: A longitudinal design with purposive sampling was deployed. Data collection occurred at the baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). In total, 53 breast cancer survivors agreed to participate. All participants completed the first two rounds of data collection, 49 participants completed data collection at the 6-month mark (T3). The Chinese versions of the Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Scale (SRAHP) and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) were used. RESULTS: Health behavior self-efficacy and health-promoting lifestyle scores increased over time. Age, impaired cardiac function, those taking a career break, psychological well-being, and responsible health practice in self-efficacy for health behaviors were significant predictors of health-promoting lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: Younger breast cancer survivors, those taking a career break, and those with poor health behavior self-efficacy were less likely to engage in a health-promoting lifestyle and may require guidance in improving overall health behaviors. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Healthcare providers should not only be aware of the suboptimal health promotion lifestyle in breast cancer survivors but also focus on enhancing health behavior self-efficacy. This is particularly crucial for younger breast cancer survivors or those currently unemployed.

Clinical Significance of Vulnerability Assessment in Patients with Primary Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify vulnerable patients with head and neck cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) who are susceptible to higher treatment-related adverse effects and have poorer treatment tolerance. This study also aimed to determine whether comprehensive geriatric assessment, developed in the geriatric population, can predict vulnerability to treatment-related adverse events and survival even in nongeriatric patients with head and neck cancer, as well as the prevalence of vulnerability and its effect on toxicities and survival among these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective cohort study examined 461 patients with primary head and neck cancer who underwent definitive CCRT during 2016 to 2017 at 3 medical centers across Taiwan. Vulnerability is defined as susceptibility to cancer- and treatment-related adverse events that result in poor treatment tolerance and unexpected emergent medical needs, such as hospitalization and emergency room visits. Vulnerability was assessed as impairment with ≥2 dimensions on comprehensive geriatric assessment, 7 days before CCRT. The association of vulnerability with treatment-related adverse events and survival was analyzed. RESULTS: The prevalence of vulnerability was 22.2%, 27.3%, 30.2%, and 27.9% among patients aged 20 to 34, 35 to 49, 50 to 64, and >65 years, respectively. Survival was poorer in vulnerable patients than in nonvulnerable patients (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.07; P = .003). Vulnerable patients showed a higher tendency toward CCRT incompletion (19.5% vs 6.1%, P < .001), hospitalization (34.6% vs 23.5%, P = .020), need for tubal feeding (29.3% vs 11.8%, P < .001), and longer length of hospital stay (8.1 days vs 4.0 days, P = .004) than nonvulnerable patients. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were more severe in vulnerable patients than in nonvulnerable patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerability, which is an urgent concern when it presents among patients with head and neck cancer, was independently associated with poorer survival and severe treatment-related complications. Vulnerability assessment should be routinely evaluated in all patients with primary head and neck cancer who are undergoing definitive CCRT, not only in such patients who are geriatric.

Changes and predictors of unmet supportive care needs in Taiwanese women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To investigate changes in unmet supportive care needs and factors affecting those needs in Taiwanese women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal survey. SETTING: Two general surgery outpatient departments at a large medical center in northern Taiwan. SAMPLE: 124 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODS: Needs were assessed with the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form at diagnosis (T1) and one month (T2), two months (T3), and three months (T4) after diagnosis. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Supportive care needs. FINDINGS: Women had moderate-to-high levels of unmet needs, with the highest being in the health system and information domain at each time point. Levels in the domains of psychological, health system and information, and sexuality needs were higher (p < 0.001) at T1 than at T2, T3, and T4. However, levels of unmet physical and daily living needs increased significantly over time (p < 0.001). Unmet supportive care needs were significantly predicted by younger age and higher levels of education, symptom distress, trait anxiety, state anxiety, and time since diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Supportive care needs changed significantly over time and were predicted by personal characteristics, as well as physical and emotional factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses should assess the needs of patients with breast cancer and provide them with individualized, culturally sensitive informational, social, and emotional support from breast cancer diagnosis through the first four months of treatment.