Cardiac surgery simulation: a low-cost feasible option in an Australasian setting.

BACKGROUND: Simulation training is a useful adjunct to surgical training and education (SET) in Cardiothoracic Surgery yet training opportunities outside the Royal Australasian College of Surgery or industry-sponsored workshops are rare due to high cost and limited training faculty, time, assessment tools or structured curricula. We describe our experience in establishing a low-cost cardiac simulation programme. METHODS: We created low-cost models using hospital facilities, hardware stores, abattoirs and donations from industry. Three workshops were conducted on coronary anastomoses, aortic and mitral valve replacement. RESULTS: Whole porcine hearts were sourced from local farms. Industry donations of obsolete stock were used for suture and valve material-stations constructed using ironing-board, 2-L buckets and kebab-skewers. Suture ring holders were fashioned from recycled cardboard or donated. All participants were asked to complete pre and post simulation self-assessment forms. Across three workshops, 45 participants (57.8% female) with a median age 27 (interquartile range 24-31) attended. Training level consisted of nurses (8, 17.8%), medical students (17, 37.8%), residents/house officers (6, 13.3%) and registrars (14, 31.1%). There were improvements in knowledge of anatomy (mean difference 18%; 95% confidence interval 12%-24%), imaging (16%; 10%-22%) and procedural components (34%; 28%-42%); and practical ability to describe steps (30%; 24%-38%), partially (32%; 26%-38%) or fully complete (32%; 28%-38%) the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery is feasible in a hospital setting with low overhead costs. It can benefit participants at all training levels and has the potential to be implemented in training hospitals as an adjunct to the SET programme.

Assessment of the EuroSCORE II in a New Zealand Tertiary Centre.

BACKGROUND: The updated European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II) is a well-established cardiac surgery risk scoring tool for estimating operative mortality. This risk stratification system was derived from a predominantly European patient cohort. No validation analysis of this risk model has been undertaken for the New Zealand population across all major cardiac surgery procedures. We aim to assess the efficacy (discrimination and calibration) of the EuroSCORE II for predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients at a large New Zealand tertiary centre. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected on patients undergoing cardiac surgery from September 2014 to September 2017 at Waikato Hospital, New Zealand. Patient demographic information, preoperative clinical risk factors and outcome data were entered into a national database. Included patients received either isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated valve surgery, isolated thoracic aortic surgery, or a combination of these procedures. The primary outcome was the discrimination and calibration of predicted EuroSCORE II risk scores compared with observed 30-day mortality events. RESULTS: 1,666 cardiac surgery patients were included during the study period, with an average EuroSCORE II of 2.97% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.76-3.18). Nine hundred thirty-three (933) patients underwent isolated CABG, 384 underwent isolated valve surgery, 48 received isolated thoracic aortic surgery and 301 received combination procedures. Thirty-day (30-day) mortality events in each of these groups was 7, 4, 2 and 13 deaths respectively. There were 26 deaths across the total cohort at 30-days (observed mortality rate 1.56%). Discrimination analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated the area under the curve (AUC) of the EuroSCORE II in each of these groups as 93.4% (95% CI: 91.6-94.9, p<0.0001), 66.3% (95% CI: 61.3-71.0, p=0.37), 37.0% (95% CI: 15.7-58.2, p=0.23) and 74.8% (95% CI: 69.5-79.6, p<0.0001) respectively. The total cohort AUC was 83.1% (95% CI: 81.2-84.9, p<0.0001). Calibration analysis using Hosmer-Lemeshow tests for the subgroups revealed p-values of 0.848, 0.114, 0.638 and 0.2 respectively. The total cohort Hosmer-Lemeshow p-value was 0.317. CONCLUSIONS: EuroSCORE II showed a strong discriminative ability for isolated CABG 30-day mortality in a New Zealand patient cohort. However, the scoring system discriminated poorly across valvular, thoracic aortic or complex combination cardiac surgical procedures. Good calibration of the EuroSCORE II was achieved across both the total cohort and subgroups. It is important to consider the performance of other cardiac surgery risk stratification models for the New Zealand population.

Are village health volunteers as good as basic health staffs in providing malaria care? A country wide analysis from Myanmar, 2015.

BACKGROUND: Malaria is one of the major public health problems in Myanmar. Village health volunteers (VHV) are the key malaria diagnosis and treatment service provider at community level in addition to basic health staffs (BHS). This countrywide analysis aimed to assess and compare the accessibility to- and quality of malaria care (treatment initiation, treatment within 24 h and complete treatment delivery) between VHV and BHS in Myanmar. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using record review of routinely collected programme data available in electronic format. All patients with undifferentiated fever screened and diagnosed for malaria in January-December 2015 by VHV and BHS under National Malaria Control Programme in Myanmar were included in the study. Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated to assess the effect of VHV/BHS on receipt of treatment by patients. RESULTS: Of 978,735 undifferentiated fever patients screened in 2015, 11.0% of patients were found malaria positive and the malaria positivity in VHV and BHS group were 11.1 and 10.9% respectively. Access to malaria care: higher proportion of children aged 5-14 years (21.8% vs 17.3%) and females (43.7% vs 41.8%) with fever were screened for malaria by VHV compared to BHS. However, the same for children aged < 5 years was 2.2% lower in VHV group compared to BHS. Quality of malaria care: the proportion of malaria cases that received treatment was 96.6 and 94.9; treatment initiation within 24 h of fever was 44.7 and 34.1; and, complete treatment delivery was 80.9 and 88.2, respectively, in VHV and BHS groups. After adjustment for potential confounders, patients with malaria provided care by VHV had 1.02 times higher chance of receiving treatment compared to BHS [aPR (95% confidence interval) 1.017 (1.015, 1.020)]. CONCLUSIONS: The VHV were more accessible to children and women than BHS in providing malaria screening services. The malaria treatment services provided by VHV was as good as BHS. Further qualitative research to explore and address the challenges on initiation and delivering complete treatment by VHV including inventory assessment and cost-effectiveness studies on integration of VHV in routine health system are needed.

"Alert-Audit-Act": assessment of surveillance and response strategy for malaria elimination in three low-endemic settings of Myanmar in 2016.

BACKGROUND: Myanmar, a malaria endemic country of Southeast Asia, adopted surveillance and response strategy similar to "1-3-7" Chinese strategy to achieve sub-national elimination in six low-endemic region/states of the country. Among these, Yangon, Bago-East, and Mon region/states have implemented this malaria surveillance and response strategy with modification in 2016. The current study was conducted to assess the case notification, investigation, classification, and response strategy (NICR) in these three states. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using routine program data of all patients with malaria diagnosed and reported under the National Malaria Control Programme in 2016 from the above three states. As per the program, all malaria cases need to be notified within 1 day and investigated within 3 days of diagnosis and response to control (active case detection and control) should be taken for all indigenous malaria cases within 7 days of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 959 malaria cases were diagnosed from the study area in 2016. Of these, the case NICR details were available only for 312 (32.5%) malaria cases. Of 312 cases, the case notification, investigation, and classification were carried out within 3 days of malaria diagnosis in 95.5% cases (298/312). Of 208 indigenous malaria cases (66.7%, 208/312), response to control was taken in 96.6% (201/208) within 7 days of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The timeline at each stage of the strategy namely case notification, investigation, classification, and response to control was followed, and response action was taken in nearly all indigenous malaria cases for the available case information. Strengthening of health information and monitoring system is needed to avoid missing information. Future research on feasibility of mobile/tablet-based surveillance system and providing response to all cases including imported malaria can be further studied.