RESUMO
Importance: The US 340B Drug Pricing Program enables eligible hospitals to receive substantial discounts on outpatient drugs to improve hospitals' financial sustainability and maintain access to care for patients who have low income and/or are uninsured. However, it is unclear whether hospitals use program savings to subsidize access as intended. Objective: To evaluate whether the 340B program is associated with improvements in access to hospital-based services and to test whether the association varies by hospital ownership. Design, Setting, and Participants: Difference-in-differences and cohort analysis from 2010 to 2019. Never and newly participating 340B general, acute, nonfederal hospitals in the US using data from the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey of Hospitals merged with hospital and market characteristics. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Exposures: New enrollment in 340B between 2012 and 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total number of unprofitable service lines, ie, substance use, psychiatric (inpatient and outpatient), burn clinic, and obstetrics services; and profitable services, ie, cardiac surgery and orthopedic, oncologic, neurologic, and neonatal intensive services. Results: The study sample comprised a total of 2152 hospitals, 1074 newly participating and 1078 not participating in the 340B program. Participating hospitals were more likely than nonparticipating hospitals to be critical access and teaching hospitals, have higher Medicaid shares, and be located in rural areas and in Medicaid expansion states. At public hospitals, participation in the 340B program was associated with a significant increase in total unprofitable services (0.21; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.38; P = .02) and marginal increases in substance use (5.4 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -0.8 pp to 11.6 pp; P = .09) and inpatient psychiatric (6.5 pp; 95% CI, -0.7 pp to 13.7 pp; P = .09) services. Among nonprofit hospitals, there was no significant association between 340B and service offerings (profitable and unprofitable) except for an increase in oncologic services (2.5 pp; 95% CI, 0.0 pp to 5.0 pp; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: The finding of the cohort study indicate that participation in the 340B program was associated with an increase in unprofitable services among newly participating public hospitals. Nonprofit hospitals were largely unaffected. These findings suggest that public hospitals responded to 340B savings by improving patient access, whereas nonprofits did not. This heterogeneous response should be considered when evaluating the eligibility criteria for the 340B program and how it affects social welfare.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data infrastructure for cancer research is centered on registries that are often augmented with payer or hospital discharge databases, but these linkages are limited. A recent alternative in some states is to augment registry data with All-Payer Claims Databases (APCDs). These linkages capture patient-centered economic outcomes, including those driven by insurance and influence health equity, and can serve as a prototype for health economics research. OBJECTIVES: To describe and assess the utility of a linkage between the Colorado APCD and Colorado Central Cancer Registry (CCCR) data for 2012-2017. RESEARCH DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASURES: This cohort study of 91,883 insured patients evaluated the Colorado APCD-CCCR linkage on its suitability to assess demographics, area-level data, insurance, and out-of-pocket expenses 3 and 6 months after cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: The linkage had high validity, with over 90% of patients in the CCCR linked to the APCD, but gaps in APCD health plans limited available claims at diagnosis. We highlight the advantages of the CCCR-APCD, such as granular race and ethnicity classification, area-level data, the ability to capture supplemental plans, medical and pharmacy out-of-pocket expenses, and transitions in insurance plans. CONCLUSIONS: Linked data between registries and APCDs can be a cornerstone of a robust data infrastructure and spur innovations in health economics research on cost, quality, and outcomes. A larger infrastructure could comprise a network of state APCDs that maintain linkages for research and surveillance.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Gerenciamento de Dados , ColoradoRESUMO
To increase access to highly effective contraception and improve reproductive autonomy, a growing number of state Medicaid programs pay for the provision of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in addition to providing a global payment for maternity care. Using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data, we examined postpartum LARC use both overall and by race and ethnicity among respondents with Medicaid-paid births during the period 2012-18 in eight states that implemented immediate postpartum LARC payment and eight states without it. Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design, we found that the policy resulted in an overall 2.1-percentage-point increase in postpartum LARC use. Our triple-differences analysis found no significant change among White mothers and a 3.7-percentage-point increase in use among Black mothers compared with White mothers. Additional research is needed to determine whether this increase was aligned with patients' preferences and whether hospitals' immediate postpartum LARC policies and practices take a patient-centered approach that supports reproductive autonomy and equity.
Assuntos
Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Estados Unidos , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Medicaid , Período Pós-Parto , Política de SaúdeRESUMO
Importance: Prior research has reported undertreatment among patients with cancer who are insured by Medicaid, but this finding may be due, in part, to incomplete data in cancer registries. Objective: To compare disparities in radiation and hormone therapy between women with breast cancer covered by Medicaid and those with private insurance using the Colorado Central Cancer Registry (CCCR) and CCCR data supplemented with All Payer Claims Data (APCD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study included women aged 21 to 63 years who received breast cancer surgery. We linked the CCCR and Colorado APCD to identify Medicaid and privately insured women who were newly diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. In the radiation treatment analysis, we narrowed the sample to women who received breast-conserving surgery (Medicaid, n = 1408; private, n = 1984) and in the hormone therapy analysis, we selected women who were hormone-receptor positive (Medicaid, n = 1156; private, n = 1667). Main Outcomes and Measures: We used logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of treatment within 12 months to assess whether the results varied between data sources. Results: There were 3392 and 2823 participants in the radiation and hormone therapy cohorts, respectively. The mean (SD) age was 51.71 (8.30) years in the radiation therapy cohort, and 52.00 (8.16) years in the hormone therapy cohort. Among the participants, there were 140 (4%) and 105 (4%) who were Black non-Hispanic, 499 (15%) and 406 (14%) who were Hispanic, 2602 (77%) and 2190 (78%) were White, and 151 (4%) and 122 (4%) were other/unknown in the radiation and hormone therapy cohorts, respectively. A higher percentage of women were aged 50 years or younger in the Medicaid samples (40% vs 34% in the privately insured sample) and identified as non-Hispanic Black (about 7%) or Hispanic (approximately 24%). Treatment was underreported in both sources, but to a lesser extent in the APCD (2.5% and 2.0% for Medicaid and private insurance, respectively) compared with CCCR (19.5% and 13.3% for Medicaid and private insurance, respectively). Using CCCR data, Women with Medicaid insurance were 4 (95% CI, -8 to -1; P = .02) and 10 (95% CI, -14 to -6; P < .001) percentage points less likely to have a record of radiation and hormone therapy compared with privately insured women, respectively. Using combined CCCR and APCD, no statistically significant disparity was observed in radiation or hormone therapy between Medicaid-insured and privately insured women. Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with breast cancer covered by Medicaid vs private insurance, cancer treatment disparities may be overestimated if based solely on cancer registry data.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Medicaid , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Sistema de Registros , Cobertura do Seguro , HormôniosRESUMO
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requires nonprofit hospitals to report community benefit spending to justify their nonprofit tax exemption. We examined whether nonprofit hospital acquisitions influence the amount and type community benefit spending. We analyzed 2011-2018 data on urban, nonprofit hospitals. The analysis dataset included 57 hospitals that were acquired and a matched control group. We estimated difference-in-differences specifications to measure the effect of acquisitions on total community benefit spending, and three subcategories - clinical, population health, and other spending types. We found that acquisitions led to decreased population health spending (-$0.32 million, p < 0.01) and other spending categories (-$1.5 million, p < 0.05), but no significant change in total or clinical spending. If the acquirer was located out-of-state, total community benefit spending declined by $2.4 million (p < 0.10). Our findings support the need for community benefit spending to be considered, along with quality, efficiency, and prices, when evaluating the welfare impact of acquisitions.
Assuntos
Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos , Isenção Fiscal , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospitais ComunitáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of a multiyear linkage between the Colorado all-payer claims database (APCD) and the Colorado Central Cancer Registry. DATA SOURCES: Secondary 2012-2017 data from the APCD and the Colorado Cancer Registry. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of the proportion of cases captured by the linkage in relation to the cases reported by the registry. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We used probabilistic linkage to combine records from both data sources for all patients diagnosed with cancer. RESULTS: We successfully linked 93% of the 146,884 patients in the registry. Approximately 63% of linked patients were perfect matches on five identifiers. Of partial matches, 81.6% were matched on four identifiers with missing or partial Social Security Numbers. The linkage rate was lower for uninsured patients at diagnosis (74.7%) or patients with private plans (89.4%) but close to 100% for Medicare and Medicaid enrollees. Most of the 29% of patients who did not have claims at the time of diagnosis were covered by private plans that may not submit claims. CONCLUSIONS: APCD-registry linkages are a promising source of data to conduct population-based research from multiple payers. However, not all payers submit claims, and the quality of the data may vary by state.
Assuntos
Registro Médico Coordenado , Neoplasias , Idoso , Colorado/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Medicare , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nonprofit hospitals (NFPs) are required to provide community benefits, which have been historically focused on provision of medical care, to keep their tax exemption status. To increase hospital investment in community health, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act required NFPs to conduct community health needs assessments and address identified needs. Some states have leveraged this provision to encourage collaboration between NFPs and local health departments (LHDs) in local health planning. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the association of NFP-LHD collaboration in local health planning targeting drug use, with drug-induced mortality. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted difference-in-differences analyses using drug-induced mortality data from 2009 to 2016, encompassing the first 3 years after NFP-LHD collaboration in local health planning specific to drug use. We evaluated drug-induced mortality in 22 counties in which collaboration was required in comparison with that in 198 control counties. We used data collected from implementation strategy reports by NFPs and combined it with data on hospital characteristics, as well as state-level and county-level factors associated with drug-induced mortality. MEASURES: The primary outcome was county-level drug-induced mortality per 100,000 population. RESULTS: Counties, in which NFP-LHD collaboration in local health planning was required and in which NFPs and LHDs jointly prioritized drug use, experienced a deceleration in drug-induced mortality of ~8 deaths per 100,000 population compared with the mortality rate they would have experienced without collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between NFPs and LHDs to address drug use was associated with a deceleration in drug-induced mortality. Policymakers can leverage community benefit regulation to encourage NFP-LHD collaboration in local health planning.
Assuntos
Hospitais , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/mortalidade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , Governo Local , Avaliação das Necessidades , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Saúde PúblicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The patient protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to improve population health by requiring nonprofit hospitals (NFPs) to conduct triennial community health needs assessments and address the identified needs. In this context, some states have encouraged collaboration between hospitals and local health department (LHD) to increase the focus of community benefit spending onto population health. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to examine whether a 2012 state law that required NFPs to collaborate with LHDs in local health planning influenced hospital population health improvement spending. RESEARCH DESIGN: We merged Internal Revenue Service data on NFP community benefit spending with data on hospital, county and state-level characteristics and estimated a difference-in-differences specification of hospital population health spending in 2009-2016 that compared the difference between hospitals that were required to collaborate with LHDs to those that were not, before and after the requirement. MEASURES: The primary outcome was population health spending divided by operating expenses. RESULTS: We found that the requirement for hospital-LHD collaboration was associated with increased mean population health spending of â¼$393,000-$786,000 (P=0.03). This association was significant in 2015-2016, perhaps reflecting the lag between assessments and implementation. Urban hospitals were responsible for most of the increased spending. CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers have sought to encourage hospitals to increase their investment in population health; however, overall community benefit spending on population health has remained flat. We found that requiring hospital-LHD collaboration was associated with increased hospital investment in population health. It may be that hospitals increase population health spending because collaboration improves expected effectiveness or increases hospital accountability.
Assuntos
Administração Hospitalar/economia , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos , Administração em Saúde Pública/métodos , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Colaboração Intersetorial , New York , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Saúde da PopulaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a Class I Guideline recommendation, and has been shown to be a cost-effective intervention after a cardiac event, it has been reimbursed at levels insufficient to cover hospital operating costs. In January 2011, Medicare increased payment for CR in hospital outpatient settings by ≈180%. We evaluated the association between this payment increase and participation in CR of eligible Medicare beneficiaries to better understand the relationship between reimbursement policy and CR utilization. METHODS: From a 5% Medicare claims sample, we identified patients with acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or cardiac valve surgery between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2012, alive 30 days after their event, with continuous enrollment in Medicare fee-for-service, Part A/B for 4 months. Trends and changes in CR participation were estimated using an interrupted time series approach with a hierarchical logistic model, hospital random intercepts, adjusted for patient, hospital, market, and seasonality factors. Estimates were expressed using average marginal effects on a percent scale. RESULTS: Among 76 695 eligible patients, average annual CR participation was 19.5% overall. In the period before payment increase, adjusted annual participation grew by 1.1 percentage points (95% CI, 0.48-2.4). No immediate change occurred in CR participation when the new payment was implemented. In the period after payment increase, on average, 20% of patients participated in CR annually. The annual growth rate in CR participation slowed in the post-period by 1.3 percentage points (95% CI, -2.4 to -0.12) compared with the prior period. Results were somewhat sensitive to time window variations. CONCLUSIONS: The 2011 increase in Medicare reimbursement for CR was not associated with an increase in participation. Future studies should evaluate whether payment did not reach a threshold to incentivize hospitals or if hospitals were not sensitive to reimbursement changes.
Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between direct cognitive assessment introduced with the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) and new diagnoses of dementia, and to determine if effects vary by race. DATA SOURCES: Medicare Limited Data Set 5% sample claims 2003-2014 and the HRSA Area Health Resources Files. STUDY DESIGN: Instrumental Variable approach estimating the relationship between AWV utilization and new diagnoses of dementia using county-level Welcome to Medicare Visit rates as an instrument. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Three hundred twenty-four thousand three hundred and eighty-five fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries without dementia when the AWV was introduced in 2011. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Annual Wellness Visit utilization was associated with an increased probability of new dementia diagnosis with effects varying by racial group (categorized as white, black, Hispanic/Latino, or Asian based on Social Security Administration data). Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for new dementia diagnosis within 6 months of AWV utilization were as follows: 2.34 (2.13, 2.58) white, 2.22 (1.71, 2.89) black, 4.82 (2.94, 7.89) Asian, and 6.14 (3.70, 10.19) Hispanic (P < .001 for each). Our findings show that estimates that do not control for selection underestimate the effect of AWV on new diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia diagnosis rates increased with AWV implementation with heterogenous effects by race and ethnicity. Current recommendations by the United States Preventive Services Task Force state that the evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against screening for cognitive impairment in older adults.
Assuntos
Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/etnologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Grupos Raciais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Background Dialysis maintenance interventions account for billions of dollars in U.S. Medicare spending and are performed by multiple medical specialties. Whether Medicare costs differ by physician specialty is, to the knowledge of the authors, not known. Purpose To assess patency-adjusted costs of endovascular dialysis access maintenance by physician specialty. Materials and Methods In this retrospective longitudinal cohort study, patients who were beneficiaries of Medicare undergoing their first arteriovenous access placement in 2009 were identified by using billing codes in the 5% Limited Data Set. By tracking their utilization data through 2014, postintervention primary patency and aggregate payments associated with maintenance interventions were calculated. Unadjusted payments per year of access patency gain were compared across physician specialty. A general linear mixed-effects model adjusted for covariates was used, as follows: patient characteristics, access type (fistula vs graft), clinical severity, type of intervention (angioplasty, stent, thrombolysis), clinical location (hospital outpatient vs office-based laboratory), and resource utilization (operating room use, anesthesia use). Results First arteriovenous access was performed in 1479 beneficiaries (mean age, 63 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; 820 men) in 2009. Through 2014, 8166 maintenance interventions were performed in this cohort. Unadjusted mean Medicare payments for each incremental year of patency were as follows: $71 000 for radiologists, $89 000 for nephrologists, and $174 000 for surgeons. Billing for operating room (41.8% [792 of 1895], surgery; 10.2% [277 of 2709], nephrology; and 31.1% [1108 of 3562], radiology) and anesthesia (19.9% [377 of 1895], surgery; 2.6% [70 of 2709], nephrology; 4.7% [170 of 3562], radiology) varied by specialty and accounted for 407% and 132% higher payments, respectively. After adjusting for clinical severity and location, type of intervention, and resource utilization, nephrologists and surgeons had 59% (95% confidence interval: 44%, 73%; P < .001) and 57% (95% confidence interval: 43%, 72%; P < .001) higher payments, respectively, for the same patency gain compared with radiologists. Operating room use and anesthesia services were major drivers of higher cost, with 407% (95% confidence interval: 374%, 443%; P < .001) and 132% (95% confidence interval: 116%, 150%; P < .001) higher costs, respectively. Conclusion Patency-adjusted payments for hemodialysis access maintenance differed by physician specialty, driven partly by discrepant rates of billing for operating room and anesthesia use. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by White in this issue.
Assuntos
Medicare/economia , Medicina , Diálise Renal/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Counseling on access to lethal means is highly recommended for patients with suicide risk, but there are no formal evaluations of its impact in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether lethal means assessment reduces the likelihood of suicide attempt and death outcomes. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design using an instrumental variable to overcome confounding due to unmeasured patient characteristics that could influence provider decisions to deliver lethal means assessment. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Colorado, an integrated health system serving over 600,000 members, with comprehensive capture of all electronic health records, medical claims, and death information. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who endorsed suicide ideation on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screener administered in behavioral health and primary care settings from 2010 to 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Provider documentation of lethal means assessment in the text of clinical notes, collected using a validated Natural Language Processing program. MEASUREMENTS: Main outcome was ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for self-inflicted injury or suicide death within 180 days of index PHQ-9 event. RESULTS: We found 33% of patients with suicide ideation reported on the PHQ-9 received lethal means assessment in the 30 days following identification. Lethal means assessment reduced the risk of a suicide attempt or death within 180 days from 3.3 to 0.83% (p = .034, 95% CI = .069-.9). LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured suicide prevention practices that co-occur with lethal means assessment may contribute to the effects observed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should expand the use of counseling on access to lethal means, along with co-occurring suicide prevention practices, to all patients who report suicide ideation.
Assuntos
Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio , Adulto , Colorado/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de DoençasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dementia is a leading cause of disability for adults older than 65 years. Exercise intervention slows functional decline and improves balance; however, the efficacy of physical therapy (PT) services for persons with dementia is unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of home health PT services on physical function for Medicare beneficiaries with a primary diagnosis of dementia. DESIGN: Observational cohort study using a combined Medicare data set of home health beneficiaries; we performed augmented inverse probability weighted regression with demographic, comorbidity, and symptom-level characteristics analyzed as covariates. SETTING: Home healthcare, United States, 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries who had a primary diagnosis of dementia and home health function evaluations at discharge (n = 1477). INTERVENTION: PT treatment, examined by (1) any PT and (2) PT visit number. MEASUREMENT: Improvement in composite activity of daily living (ADL) scores from home health admit to discharge. RESULTS: Any PT increased the probability of improvement in ADLs by 15.2% (P < .001). Compared to 1 to 5 PT visits, 6 to 13 visits increased the probability of ADL improvement by 11.6% (P < .001). CONCLUSION: PT intervention is beneficial for ADL function improvement in Medicare home health beneficiaries with a primary diagnosis of dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:867-871, 2020.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Demência/terapia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hypertension in older kidney donor candidates is viewed as safe. However, hypertension guidelines have evolved and long-term outcomes have not been explored. We sought to quantify the 15-year risk of ESKD and mortality in older donors (≥50 years old) with versus those without hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A United States cohort of 24,533 older donors from 1999 to 2016, including 2265 with predonation hypertension, were linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data and the Social Security Death Master File to ascertain ESKD development and mortality. The exposure of interest was predonation hypertension. From 2004 to 2016, hypertension was defined as documented predonation use of antihypertensive therapy, regardless of systolic BP or diastolic BP; from 1999 to 2003, when there was no documentation of antihypertensive therapy, hypertension was defined as predonation systolic BP ≥140 or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg. RESULTS: Older donors were 82% white, 6% black, 7% Hispanic, and 3% Asian. The median follow-up was 7.1 years (interquartile range, 3.4-11.1; maximum, 18). There were 24 ESKD and 252 death events during the study period. The 15-year risk of ESKD was 0.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.4 to 1.6) for donors with hypertension (mean systolic BP, 138 mm Hg) versus 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4) for donors without hypertension (mean systolic BP, 123 mm Hg; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.28 to 7.22; P=0.01). When predonation antihypertensive therapy was available, the risk of ESKD was 6.21-fold higher (95% CI, 1.20 to 32.17; P=0.03) for donors using antihypertensive therapy (mean systolic BP, 132 mm Hg) versus those not using antihypertensive therapy (mean systolic BP, 124 mm Hg). There was no significant association between donor hypertension and 15-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.66; P=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with older donors without hypertension, older donors with hypertension had higher risk of ESKD, but not mortality, for 15 years postdonation. However, the absolute risk of ESKD was small.
Assuntos
Hipertensão/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Transplante de Rim , Doadores Vivos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of state laws on nonprofit hospital community benefit spending. DESIGN: We used multivariate models to estimate the association between different types of state-level community benefit laws and nonprofit hospital community benefit spending from tax filings. SETTING: All 50 US states. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2421 nonprofit short-term acute care hospital organizations that filled an internal revenue service Form 990 and Schedule H for calendar during years 2009-2015. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2015, short-term acute care hospitals spent an average of $46 billion per year in total, or $20 million per hospital on community benefit activities. Exposure to a state-level community benefit law of any type was associated with an $8.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.20-15.64) per $1000 of total operating expense greater community benefit spending. Spending amounts and patterns varied on the basis of the type of community benefit law and hospital urbanicity. CONCLUSIONS: State laws are associated with nonprofit hospital community benefit spending. Policy makers can use community benefit laws to increase nonprofit hospital engagement with public health.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Administração Financeira de Hospitais/legislação & jurisprudência , Administração Financeira de Hospitais/métodos , Jurisprudência , Humanos , Governo Estadual , Isenção Fiscal/economia , Isenção Fiscal/legislação & jurisprudência , Isenção Fiscal/tendências , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados/economia , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados/tendências , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although residence is a key contributor to cost and utilization in stroke patient care, its contribution to the care of persons with aphasia (PWA) is unknown. The objective of this study was to use discharge-level hospital inpatient data to examine the influence of patient residence (rural vs urban) and race-ethnicity on service utilization and cost of care among PWA. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Administrative data from acute care hospitals in the state of North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=4381) with poststroke aphasia. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay (LOS), speech-language pathology (SLP) service utilization, costs of care. METHODS: The 2011-2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database data were analyzed to examine the effect of rural or urban residence on LOS, SLP service utilization, as well as total inpatient and SLP service costs. These outcomes were further analyzed across both residence and racial groups (non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black). Outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear model. RESULTS: Both rural and urban black PWA experienced longer average LOS after controlling for demographics, illness severity, and the hospital where they received care. Rural blacks experienced longer LOS, received greater SLP services, and incurred greater average total hospital costs than their rural white counterparts after adjusting for differences in their demographics and stroke or illness severity. The differences were attenuated after controlling for the hospital where they received care. CONCLUSIONS: For PWA, race-ethnicity has a larger effect on average total medical costs, SLP service utilization, and LOS than residence. It is unclear how and why blacks with aphasia have greater service utilization and costs in acute care, yet their aphasia outcomes are worse. Future studies are required to explore potential factors such as quality of care.
Assuntos
Afasia/reabilitação , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Patologia da Fala e Linguagem/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Afasia/etnologia , Afasia/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Patologia da Fala e Linguagem/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etnologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine ethnoracial disparities in antidementia medication use, accounting for implementation of Part D, and to evaluate the role of prescription drug coverage as a cause of antidementia medication disparities. DESIGN: Rotating panel of Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 2003 to 2013. SETTING: Nationally representative sample of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries with dementia. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling FFS Medicare beneficiaries with dementia (N=4,304). MEASUREMENTS: Antidementia medication use, defined as at least one prescription fill in a given year. RESULTS: Unadjusted antidementia medication use was 10-percentage points lower for ethnoracial minority beneficiaries before Part D was implemented in 2006 (p=.01). This difference was attenuated after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors (6-percentage points; p=.10). Part D was associated with a 6-percentage point increase in use (p<.01). The increase in use associated with Part D was higher although not statistically significantly so in ethnoracial minority beneficiaries (8-percentage points, p=.08). Analyses of each ethnoracial group found a significant effect of Part D only in Hispanic/Latino beneficiaries (18-percentage points; p<.01, adjusted). CONCLUSION: Antidementia medication disparities were reduced with expanded prescription drug coverage through Medicare Part D. Increases in antidementia medication use for minority beneficiaries started after Part D was implemented, with the largest increases in use observed in Hispanic/Latino beneficiaries.
Assuntos
Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Demência/etnologia , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vida Independente , Masculino , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In 2011, Medicare began offering annual preventive care visits (annual wellness visit; AWV) to beneficiaries at no charge. Providing free preventive care supports primary and secondary prevention of chronic disease and may reduce ethnoracial disparities in health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To estimate AWV utilization trends by ethnoracial group in a nationally representative sample of the Medicare population. RESEARCH DESIGN: We estimated the probability of AWV utilization using probit regression models with beneficiary-reported ethnoracial group as the primary predictor and demographics, socioeconomic indicators, and factors related to access and utilization of health care as covariates. SUBJECTS: In total, 14,687 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey 2011-2013. MEASURES: AWV utilization was identified using procedure codes. RESULTS: Overall AWV utilization increased from 8.1% (2011) to 13.4% (2013). In 2011, utilization was highest in non-Hispanic white (8.5%) and lowest in non-Hispanic black (4.5%) beneficiaries. Utilization increased the most in non-Hispanic black beneficiaries, to 15.4% in 2013. Significant differences in AWV utilization by non-Hispanic black and Hispanic/Latino beneficiaries were found in unadjusted models, but did not persist after controlling for income and education. Having a usual (nonemergent) place of care and a nonrural residence were strong predictors of utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of the AWV has increased modestly since its introduction, but remains low. Utilization varies by ethnoracial group, with disparities largely explained by differences in income and education. Further efforts are needed to evaluate AWV utilization and effectiveness, especially among low socioeconomic status ethnoracial minorities.
Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Decisions by states about whether to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have implications for hospitals' financial health. We hypothesized that Medicaid expansion of eligibility for childless adults prevents hospital closures because increased Medicaid coverage for previously uninsured people reduces uncompensated care expenditures and strengthens hospitals' financial position. We tested this hypothesis using data for the period 2008-16 on hospital closures and financial performance. We found that the ACA's Medicaid expansion was associated with improved hospital financial performance and substantially lower likelihoods of closure, especially in rural markets and counties with large numbers of uninsured adults before Medicaid expansion. Future congressional efforts to reform Medicaid policy should consider the strong relationship between Medicaid coverage levels and the financial viability of hospitals. Our results imply that reverting to pre-ACA eligibility levels would lead to particularly large increases in rural hospital closures. Such closures could lead to reduced access to care and a loss of highly skilled jobs, which could have detrimental impacts on local economies.
Assuntos
Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Medicaid/economia , Fechamento de Instituições de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Many high utilizers of the emergency department (ED) have public insurance, especially through Medicaid. We evaluated how participation in Bridges to Care (B2C)-an ED-initiated, multidisciplinary, community-based program-affected subsequent ED use, hospital admissions, and primary care use among publicly insured or Medicaid-eligible high ED utilizers. During the six months after the B2C intervention was completed, participants had significantly fewer ED visits (a reduction of 27.9 percent) and significantly more primary care visits (an increase of 114.0 percent), compared to patients in the control group. In a subanalysis of patients with mental health comorbidities, we found that recipients of B2C services had significantly fewer ED visits (a reduction of 29.7 percent) and hospitalizations (30.0 percent), and significantly more primary care visits (an increase of 123.2 percent), again compared to patients in the control group. The B2C program reduced acute care use and increased the number of primary care visits among high ED utilizers, including those with mental health comorbidities.