Biologic therapies for refractory juvenile dermatomyositis: five years of experience of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance in North America.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) has improved remarkably since the 1960's with the use of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy. Yet there remain a minority of children who have refractory disease. Since 2003 the sporadic use of biologics (genetically-engineered proteins that usually are derived from human genes) for inflammatory myositis has been reported. In 2011-2016 we investigated our collective experience of biologics in JDM through the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA). METHODS: The JDM biologic study group developed a survey on the CARRA member experience using biologics for Juvenile DM utilizing Delphi consensus methods in 2011-2012. The survey was completed online by the CARRA members interested in JDM in 2012. A second survey was similarly developed that provided more opportunity to describe their experiences with biologics in JDM in detail and was completed by CARRA members in Feb 2013. During three CARRA meetings in 2013-2015, nominal group techniques were used for achieving consensus on the current choices of biologic drugs. A final survey was performed at the 2016 CARRA meeting. RESULTS: One hundred and five of a potential 231 pediatric rheumatologists (42%) responded to the first survey in 2012. Thirty-five of 90 had never used a biologic for Juvenile DM at that time. Fifty-five of 91 (denominators vary) had used biologics for JDM in their practice with 32%, 5%, and 4% using rituximab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively, and 17% having used more than one of the three drugs. Ten percent used a biologic as monotherapy, 19% a biologic in combination with methotrexate (mtx), 52% a biologic in combination with mtx and corticosteroids, 42% a combination of a biologic, mtx, corticosteroids (steroids), and an immunosuppressive drug, and 43% a combination of a biologic, IVIG and mtx. The results of the second survey supported these findings in considerably more detail with multiple combinations of drugs used with biologics and supported the use of rituximab, abatacept, anti-TNFα drugs, and tocilizumab in that order. One hundred percent recommended that CARRA continue studying biologics for JDM. The CARRA meeting survey in 2016 again supported the study and use of these four biologic drug groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our CARRA JDM biologic work group developed and performed three surveys demonstrating that pediatric rheumatologists in North America have been using multiple biologics for refractory JDM in numerous scenarios from 2011 to 2016. These survey results and our consensus meetings determined our choice of four biologic therapies (rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab and anti-TNFα drugs) to consider for refractory JDM treatment when indicated and to evaluate for comparative effectiveness and safety in the future. Significance and Innovations This is the first report that provides a substantial clinical experience of a large group of pediatric rheumatologists with biologics for refractory JDM over five years. This experience with biologic therapies for refractory JDM may aid pediatric rheumatologists in the current treatment of these children and form a basis for further clinical research into the comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics for refractory JDM.

The Cutaneous Assessment Tool: development and reliability in juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical care and therapeutic trials in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) require accurate and consistent assessment of cutaneous involvement. The Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) was designed to measure skin activity and damage in IIM. We describe the development and inter-rater reliability of the CAT, and the frequency of lesions endorsed in a large population of juvenile IIM patients. METHODS: The CAT includes 10 activity, 4 damage and 7 combined lesions. Thirty-two photographic slides depicting IIM skin lesions were assessed by 11 raters. One hundred and twenty-three children were assessed by 11 paediatric rheumatologists at 10 centres. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using simple agreements and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Simple agreements in recognizing lesions as present or absent were generally high (0.5-1.0). ICCs for CAT lesions were moderate (0.4-0.75) in both slides and real patients. ICCs for the CAT activity and damage scores were 0.71 and 0.81, respectively. CAT activity scores ranged from 0 to 44 (median 7, potential range 0-96) and CAT damage scores ranged from 0 to 13 (median 1, potential range 0-22). The most common cutaneous lesions endorsed were periungual capillary loop changes (63%), Gottron's papules/sign (53%), heliotrope rash (49%) and malar/facial erythema (49%). CONCLUSIONS: Total CAT activity and damage scores have moderate to good reliability. Assessors generally agree on the presence of a variety of cutaneous lesions. The CAT is a promising, semi-quantitative tool to comprehensively assess skin disease activity and damage in IIM.

Validation of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire in the juvenile idiopathic myopathies. Juvenile Dermatomyositis Disease Activity Collaborative Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) in patients with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients were enrolled in a multicenter collaborative study, during which subjects were assessed twice, 7-9 months apart. Physical function was measured using the CHAQ. Internal reliability was assessed using adjusted item-total correlations and item endorsement rates. Construct validity was assessed by comparing predicted and actual correlations of the CHAQ with other measures of physical function and disease activity. Responsiveness was assessed by calculating effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) in a group of a priori defined "improvers." RESULTS: Item-total correlations were high (rs range = 0.35-0.81), suggesting all items were related to overall physical function. Manual muscle testing and the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale correlated moderate to strongly with the CHAQ (r = -0.64 and -0.75, both p < 0.001). Moderate correlations were also seen with the physician global assessment of disease activity (rs = 0.58, p < 0.001), parent global assessment of overall health (rs = -0.65, p < 0.001), Steinbrocker function class (rs = 0.69, p < 0.001), and global skin activity (rs = 0.40, p < 0.001), while global disease damage and skin damage had low correlations (rs = 0.13 and 0.07, p > or =0.17). Responsiveness of the CHAQ was high, with ES = 1.05 and SRM = 1.20. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with juvenile IIM, the CHAQ exhibited internal reliability, construct validity, and strong responsiveness. We conclude that the CHAQ is a valid measure of physical function in juvenile IIM, appropriate for use in therapeutic trials, and potentially in the clinical care of these patients.

Development of validated disease activity and damage indices for the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. II. The Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS): a quantitative tool for the evaluation of muscle function. The Juvenile Dermatomyositis Disease Activity Collaborative Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To develop, validate, and determine the measurement characteristics of a quantitative tool for assessing the severity of muscle involvement in children with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. METHODS: The Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) was developed from 2 existing observational functional assessment tools to assess muscle function in the areas of strength and endurance across a wide range of ability and ages. The 14 ordinal items included were chosen to assess primarily axial and proximal muscle groups and are ranked with standard performance and scoring methods. Following the development of the CMAS, a training video and written instructions were developed and reviewed by the physicians participating in this study. Subsequently, utilizing a randomized block design, 12 physicians independently scored 10 children (9 with dermatomyositis, 1 with polymyositis; ages 4-15 years) twice in one day (morning and afternoon) on the CMAS. A pediatric physical therapist performed quantitative manual muscle strength testing (MMT) twice on each child (morning and afternoon), including the neck, trunk, and proximal and distal extremity muscle groups. RESULTS: The CMAS has a potential range of 0-51, with higher scores indicating greater muscle strength and endurance. The observed mean for the 10 patients was 36.4 (median 44, SD 14.1, observed range 5-51). The total score for the CMAS correlated with the physician's global assessment (by visual analog scale) of disease activity, the MMT score, serum creatine kinase level, and the Juvenile Arthritis Functional Assessment Report score. The score on the CMAS was not correlated with patient age. Interrater reliability (Kendall's coefficient of concordance) ranged from 0.77 to 1.0 for individual items (all P < 0.001), and overall, it was 0.95 (P < 0.001). Intrarater reliability for the individual physicians was measured by correlation of the CMAS scores for each patient on 2 separate evaluations and ranged from 0.97 to 0.99, with an overall correlation for all physicians of 0.98 (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CMAS demonstrated an acceptable range of observed scores, excellent convergent validity, and excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. The CMAS is validated to quantitatively assess muscle function in the areas of strength and endurance in children with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. It can be used in routine clinical care as well as therapeutic trials.

Legal rights of children with musculoskeletal disabilities.

As market forces increasingly control medicine, we must not forget the disabled, especially children. Although the costs of appropriate comprehensive services are substantial, it is well worth the cost to facilitate an adulthood in which these patients are on their own, possibly earning their livelihood, and experiencing the best quality of life our society can provide.