Variability of performance status assessment between patients with hematologic malignancies and their physicians.

This study was conducted to determine the incidence of inter-observer variability in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) rating between patients with leukemia and lymphoma and their physicians. ECOG PS was assessed at diagnosis by patients and their physicians and stratified by disease subtype, gender, age, disease stage and education. Association between patient- and physician-rated PS and overall survival (OS) was stratified by subtype and prognostic risk score. Overall, 65% of patients and physicians rated PS the same. Age, disease stage and disease subtype were significant predictors of PS disagreement. PS was a significant predictor of OS irrespective of assessment by patients or physicians across all subtypes except those with Hodgkin lymphoma. These findings suggest the need for physicians to better communicate with patients when determining PS, as PS is a strong predictor of survival and is critical in treatment decisions, including determining fitness for cancer treatment.

International Assessment of Event-Free Survival at 24 Months and Subsequent Survival in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma.

Purpose Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) have aggressive clinical behavior. We have previously shown that event-free survival (EFS) at 24 months (EFS24) is a clinically useful end point in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Here, we assess EFS24 and subsequent overall survival (OS) in large, multinational PTCL cohorts. Patients and Methods Patients with systemic PTCL newly diagnosed from 2000 to 2012 and treated with curative intent were included from the United States and Sweden (initial cohorts) and from Canada (replication cohort). EFS was defined as time from date of diagnosis to progression after primary treatment, retreatment, or death. Subsequent OS was measured after achieving EFS24 or from the time of progression if it occurred within 24 months. OS rates were compared with the age-, sex-, and country-matched general population. Results Seven hundred seventy-five patients were included in the study (the median age at diagnosis was 64 years; 63% were men). Results were similar in the initial and replication cohorts, and a combined analysis was undertaken. Sixty-four percent of patients progressed within the first 24 months and had a median OS of only 4.9 months (5-year OS, 11%). In contrast, median OS after achieving EFS24 was not reached (5-year OS, 78%), although relapses within 5 years of achieving EFS24 occurred in 23% of patients. Superior outcomes after achieving EFS24 were observed in younger patients (≤ 60 years of age: 5-year OS, 91%). Conclusion EFS24 stratifies subsequent outcome in PTCL. Patients with PTCL with primary refractory disease or early relapse have extremely poor survival. However, more than one third of patients with PTCL remain in remission 2 years after diagnosis with encouraging subsequent OS, especially in younger patients. These marked differences in outcome suggest that EFS24 has utility for patient counseling, study design, and risk stratification in PTCL.

Time to Second-line Treatment and Subsequent Relative Survival in Older Patients With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Novel targeted therapies offer excellent short-term outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). However, there is disagreement over how widely these therapies should be used in place of standard chemo-immunotherapy (CIT). We investigated whether stratification on the length of the interval between first-line (T1) and second-line (T2) treatments could identify a subgroup of older patients with relapsed CLL/SLL with an expectation of normal overall survival, and for whom CIT could be an acceptable treatment choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed CLL/SLL who received T2 were identified from the SEER-Medicare Linked Database. Five-year relative survival (RS5; ie, the ratio of observed survival to expected survival based on population life tables) was assessed after stratifying patients on the interval between T1 and T2. We then validated our findings in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database. RESULTS: Among 1974 SEER-Medicare patients (median age = 77 years) who received T2 for relapsed CLL/SLL, longer time-to-retreatment was associated with a modestly improved prognosis (P = .01). However, even among those retreated ≥ 3 years after T1, survival was poor compared with the general population (RS5 = 0.50 or lower in SEER-Medicare). Similar patterns were observed in the younger Mayo validation cohort, although prognosis was better overall among the Mayo patients, and patients with favorable fluorescence in situ hybridization retreated ≥ 3 years after T1 had close to normal expected survival (RS5 = 0.87). CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to quantify the degree to which targeted therapies provide meaningful improvements over CIT in long-term outcomes for older patients with relapsed CLL/SLL.

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is valid for monitoring quality of life in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We assessed the validity of administering the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) at 12-month intervals over 3 years in a longitudinal study of 611 prospectively enrolled, newly diagnosed patients with NHL. We evaluated corrected item-total correlation and percent missing to identify items that may be less useful in certain NHL patient subgroups. The FACT-G subscales and total score demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, convergent validity and known-groups validity. Most scores also demonstrated good responsiveness to change. Questions that could be problematic included GE3 (losing hope) and GP2 (nausea) for patients in remission, and GP5 (bothered by side effects) for patients being observed. Overall, the FACT-G was a valid measure for monitoring QoL over time in patients with NHL. However, sensitivity analyses based on subscale scoring that excludes potentially problematic items may be warranted.

Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for neutropenia from chemotherapy in older adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (United States).

OBJECTIVE: To study neutropenia hospitalization (NH) incidence and risk factors in a population-based sample of older adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and evaluate the validity of inferences from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases. METHODS: NHL cases receiving first-course chemotherapy were identified from Iowa SEER-Medicare. Survival methods evaluated NH risk factors. Medical record and Medicare claims data on chemotherapy and NH were compared. RESULTS: Of 761 subjects, 165 (21.7%, 95% CI: 18.8, 24.6) were hospitalized for neutropenia. Of those hospitalized, 41% were hospitalized in cycle 1 and 22% in cycle 2. Significant multivariable risk factors for NH were diffuse large cell histology, renal disease, Charlson comorbidity index, and anthracycline chemotherapy but not patient age. Medicare and medical records agreed on month of chemotherapy initiation 95% of the time and chemotherapy type 95% of the time. ICD-9 code 288.0 sensitivity for NH was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia hospitalizations were common in the first 2 chemotherapy cycles, especially among older adults with comorbidity. Findings conflict with a prior medical records study in which age was a risk factor for NH and dose intensity a negative confounder. Valid inferences about age effects on chemotherapy toxicity require more clinical detail than is available in administrative data.

Effect of clinical characteristics on neutropenia-related inpatient costs among newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases during first-course chemotherapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the costs of hospitalization for neutropenia among chemotherapy-treated patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and to assess baseline patient factors associated with these costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. DATA SOURCE: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases for Iowa from 1993-1998. PATIENTS: Patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who received all inpatient care at Iowa hospitals during their first course of chemotherapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Neutropenia-related hospitalization costs were estimated from discharge abstracts found within the earliest of the following: 6 months after the diagnosis month, the date of bone marrow transplantation, or date of death. We performed univariate tests of differences in neutropenia-related hospitalization costs in all patients in the sample, as well as tests for neutropenia-related hospitalization costs, length-of-stay, and cost/inpatient day for patients with at least one hospitalization for neutropenia. We modeled total inpatient charges over the period for patients with at least one neutropenia-related hospitalization (multiple regression). A total of 1636 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had chemotherapy in Iowa and met inclusion criteria; of these, 316 had at least one hospitalization for neutropenia. The 316 patients had 418 stays. Patients with advanced stage (vs limited stage), previous anemia (vs no anemia), positive Charlson comorbidity score (vs score of 0), and diffuse large cell histology (vs follicular) had higher mean neutropenia-related hospitalization cost/patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (p<0.05). Among those with neutropenia-related hospitalizations, a longer length of stay was associated with nonfollicular histologies, previous anemia, and positive Charlson score (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: When estimating expected payments for neutropenia-related hospitalization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, payers need to be aware of the distribution of clinical characteristics in these patients.

Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a response classification based on integration of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) into the International Workshop Criteria (IWC) provides a more accurate response assessment than IWC alone in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with aggressive NHL who underwent FDG-PET and computed tomography 1 to 16 weeks after four to eight cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone were assessed for complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) by the IWC and by integrated IWC and FDG-PET (IWC+PET). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also compared between IWC- and IWC+PET-assigned response designations. RESULTS: By IWC, 17 patients had a CR, seven had a CRu, 19 had a PR, nine had SD, and two had PD. In comparison, by IWC+PET, 35 patients had a CR, 12 had a PR, six had SD, one had PD, and zero had a CRu. In separate multivariate models, PFS was significantly shorter in patients with PR than in those with a CR using IWC (hazard ratio [HR], 8.9; P = .021) or IWC+PET (HR, 29.7; P = .0003). However, when the two classifications were included in the same multivariate model, only IWC+PET was a statistically significant independent predictor for PFS (P = .008 v P = .72 for IWC). In addition, when patients with a PR by IWC and a CR by IWC+PET were compared with those with a CR by IWC and a CR by IWC+PET, there was no significant difference in PFS (HR, 1.6; P = .72), indicating that IWC+PET identified a subset of IWC-PR patients with a more favorable prognosis. CONCLUSION: Compared with IWC, the IWC+PET-based assessment provides a more accurate response classification in patients with aggressive NHL.