Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among Children Seen in Surgical Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience of One Tertiary Care Freestanding Children's Hospital.

Background: Telemedicine use dramatically increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the effects of telemedicine on pre-existing disparities in pediatric surgical access have not been well described. We describe our center's early experience with telemedicine and disparities in patients' access to outpatient surgical care. Methods: A retrospective study of outpatient visits within all surgical divisions from May to December 2020 was conducted. We assessed the rates of scheduled telemedicine visits during that period, as well as the rate of completing a visit after it has been scheduled. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used to test for associations between these rates and patient characteristics. Results: Over the study period, 109,601 visits were scheduled. Telemedicine accounted for 6.1% of all visits with lower cancellation rates than in-person visits (26.9% vs. 34.7%). More scheduled telemedicine encounters were observed for older patients, White, English speakers, those with private insurance, and those living in rural areas. Lower odds of telemedicine visit completion were observed among patients with public insurance (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.77), Spanish language preference (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97), and those living in rural areas (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.84). In contrast, higher odds of telemedicine visit completion were associated with a higher Social Deprivation Index score (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.58). Telemedicine visit completion was also associated with increasing community-level income and distance from the hospital. Conclusions: Telemedicine use for outpatient surgical care was generally low during the peak of the pandemic, and certain populations were less likely to utilize it. These findings call for further action to bridge gaps in telemedicine use.

A Novel Pediatric Surgery Division Incentive Program Engaging Faculty, Advanced Practice Providers and Staff Around a Single Financial Growth Target.

BACKGROUND: Productivity-based financial incentive programs for faculty are common. We implemented a novel Division wide clinical productivity incentive sharing professional fee collections across faculty, nurses, and staff with half of bonuses reserved to be given out proportionally to achievement of the annual growth target. METHODS: A novel bonus plan was formulated to incentivize collection of professional fees to achieve a 15% annual growth target. The 15% was divided equally between the clinical provider, the responsible provider's center(s) of excellence, and all Division members. 50% of the bonus pool was paid out monthly and the remaining 50% was held for an end of the year payout proportional to achievement of the Divisional professional fee collection annual growth target. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: During the initial year of the program, overall Division collections and charges grew 30% and 17%, respectively. Average monthly bonuses paid through the new incentive program for faculty, advanced practice providers, and staff were $1,700, $700, and $200, respectively. The program cost $525,000 in additional bonuses over the previous year while the Division saw an increase of 2 million dollars in collections over the previous year. CONCLUSION: A clinical productivity incentive program based upon professional fee collections distributed across faculty, nurses, and staff was feasible and successful in its first year. Collections increased by a significantly higher percentage than charges, we believe collections incentive including support staff will be most useful in practices with lower rates of charge collection. Further study is needed to measure the effects of different components of the program. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. STUDY TYPE: Cost Effectiveness Study.

Utilization Trends and Disparities in Adolescent Bariatric Surgery in the United States 2009-2017.

Background: Current reports of adolescent bariatric surgery underutilization for treating severe obesity do not comprehensively assess the extent of existing disparities. We sought to describe national trends in adolescent bariatric surgery over a 9-year period and investigate previously described ethnoracial-, insurance-, income-, and geographic-based disparities. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of adolescents aged 10-19 years who underwent bariatric surgery from 2009 to 2017 was conducted using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Kids' Inpatient Database and National Inpatient Sample Databases. Annual rates and types of bariatric surgery were assessed using trend analysis and stratified by patient, hospital, and regional characteristics. Results: The rate of bariatric surgeries per 1,000,000 adolescents with severe obesity increased over time (227 cases in 2009 to 331cases in 2017). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and gastric band significantly decreased (p < 0.001), while sleeve gastrectomy became the most commonly performed bariatric surgery (p < 0.001). Surgeries were increasingly performed in urban teaching hospitals (77.9%) and most commonly in the Northeast (34.4%) and South (40.9%). The proportion of black patients (12.1%-15.8%) undergoing bariatric surgery increased, although was not significant and remained below that of white patients (p = 0.06). The proportion of publicly insured patients undergoing bariatric surgery significantly increased (17.0% to 30.7%, p < 0.001), although no changes were observed based on median household income. Conclusions: Over the study period, utilization of adolescent bariatric surgery has increased. Yet, vulnerable populations, who have the highest rates of severe obesity, continue to undergo bariatric surgery at disproportionately lower rates. Further efforts to address disparities and barriers to care are urgently needed to care for these children.