Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(10): 1377-1387, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34595950

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women and has the highest mortality rate of gynecological cancers. Niraparib was recently approved by the FDA for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with advanced epithelial OC in complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) regardless of biomarker status. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the direct economic impact on US payers of adding niraparib as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with advanced OC. METHODS: The model considered 2 scenarios: a current scenario in which niraparib does not have regulatory approval for first-line maintenance therapy and a future scenario in which niraparib has regulatory approval for first-line maintenance therapy. The budget impact was calculated as the difference in cost between the 2 scenarios. The budget impact model (BIM) considered 2 different US health care payer perspectives: a commercial health plan and a Medicare plan. Both payer perspectives were assumed to have a hypothetical 1 million affiliates that were covered. Epidemiological data was used to estimate the eligible incident population of patients with OC. Active surveillance, bevacizumab (as a monotherapy), and olaparib (as a monotherapy restricted to patients with the breast cancer gene [BRCA] mutation) were included in the model as alternative maintenance treatment options (maintenance treatment options required 1% market share for inclusion). Cost categories considered in the BIM included diagnostic testing, treatment acquisition and administration, treatment-emergent adverse events, and subsequent therapy. Results were presented as an incremental budget impact to payers over 3 years. RESULTS: For a commercial health plan of 1 million affiliates, the estimated impact of adding niraparib as a first-line maintenance treatment option for advanced epithelial OC was calculated as $87,906, $93,106, and $87,037 for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average budget impact per member per month was $0.007. For a Medicare health plan of 1 million affiliates, the estimated impact was calculated as $206,785, $219,017, and $204,739 for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average budget impact per member per month was $0.018. One-way sensitivity analyses suggested that budget impact was most sensitive to the treatment duration and market share of niraparib, the non-treatment-specific data on overall survival rates, and the treatment duration of bevacizumab. Treatment of drug-specific adverse events had little impact on the budget model. CONCLUSIONS: The model estimated a minimal budget impact to both a commercial or Medicare health plan following the introduction of niraparib as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with advanced epithelial OC who are in complete or partial response to first-line PBC regardless of biomarker status. DISCLOSURES: This study was financially supported by GlaxoSmithKline. Liu, Hawkes, Maiese, and Hurteau are employees of GlaxoSmithKline. Travers was employed by GlaxoSmithKline at the time of this study. Spalding and Walder are employees of FIECON Ltd., which was contracted by GlaxoSmithKline to develop the budget impact model used in this study.


Assuntos
Orçamentos , Indazóis/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Piperidinas/economia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/economia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos
2.
Urol Oncol ; 39(6): 367.e7-367.e17, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33736976

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) experience disease progression at different rates. The purpose of this study was to quantify the strength of patient preferences for delaying prostate cancer progression utilizing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and valuing 3 health states in the continuum of CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with CRPC, recruited from US patient panels, completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. The survey consisted of vignette-based time trade-off and a DCE designed to quantify patients' willingness to pay to delay metastatic CRPC. Three health states were presented: (1) living with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) (2) living with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) before chemotherapy, and (3) living with mCRPC either on or after chemotherapy. The DCE consisted of 15 hypothetical choices with attributes characterizing CRPC (pain, fatigue, out of pocket cost, dosing, and time until cancer metastasizes). Patients' willingness to pay for changes in each attribute were derived. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with CRPC were surveyed (mean age: 64.2 years; 74% nmCRPC). Patients valued the nmCRPC health state (0.865) significantly higher than mCRPC before chemotherapy (0.743) or mCRPC on or after chemotherapy (0.476), both P < 0.001. In the DCE, patient treatment valuation was most affected by increasing the number of months until cancer metastasized; patients were willing to pay an additional $682 per month to delay time to metastases from 6 to 24 months (95% Confidence Interval: $387-$977) and additional $1,041 per month to delay time to metastasis to 48 months (95% Confidence Interval: $591-$1,490). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated men with CRPC place significant value on delaying metastases. This study represents the first time 2 stated preference methods, time trade-off and DCE, were used together to understand patients' preferences and valuation of health states in CRPC.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Preferência do Paciente , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Progressão da Doença , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica/prevenção & controle , Preferência do Paciente/economia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/economia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
3.
Cardiol Ther ; 8(2): 329-343, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31432429

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Long-term risk for recurrent cardiovascular events among myocardial infarction (MI) patients in the acute versus chronic stable phase is not well characterized. This study was conducted to evaluate risk factors associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CVD) morbidity and to determine the transition period from the acute to chronic stable phase of disease. METHODS: Administrative claims data from a managed care database (2007-2012) were linked to the Social Security Death Index. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated over a 3-year period. The association between risk factors and clinical endpoints was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Poisson models estimated the 'transition time' from acute to chronic phase of disease. RESULTS: On average, recurrent cardiovascular event rates were higher among acute MI patients in comparison to the chronic MI patients during the first 3 months of follow-up. Over the 3-year follow-up period, survival curves became parallel and for some outcomes (i.e., acute myocardial infarction and bleeding events), were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. In both the acute and chronic MI cohorts, diabetes, heart failure, and renal disease were consistently statistically significant and positively associated with greater risk of death and ischemic events. PAD was consistently associated with increased risk among the chronic cohort and composite endpoints among the acute patients. CONCLUSIONS: Greater understanding of differences in the CVD risk profiles and the transition from acute to chronic stable phase may help identify high-risk patients and inform clinical risk stratification and long-term disease management in MI patients. FUNDING: Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

4.
J Med Econ ; 22(10): 1080-1087, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352849

RESUMO

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is a clinically heterogenous disease, and genetic mutations may be useful for patient risk stratification. This retrospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes, pharmacy use, and outpatient resource use in PC patients with and without pathogenic genomic instability mutations, including DNA repair deficiency (DRD) mutations and those in TP53, PTEN, and RB1. Methods: Patients ≥18 years newly-diagnosed with PC between June 2011-March 2016 were identified in medical and prescription claims databases linked to a genomic dataset. All-cause and PC-specific pharmacy use and outpatient resource use (office visits, laboratory tests, radiology examinations, and radiation therapies) over 1, 2, and 3 years and time to evidence of disease progression after PC diagnosis, based on secondary cancer diagnosis codes and treatments received, were evaluated in mutation carriers with ≥1 of 24 gene mutations and in a sub-set of DRD gene mutation carriers, with each compared to non-mutation carriers. Results: Mutation carriers (n = 274) and non-mutation carriers (n = 74) had similar demographic and clinical features. Non-mutation carriers had lower risks of developing metastasis and castration-resistant PC than mutation carriers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9; HR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9, respectively) and DRD mutation carriers (HR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.7; HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.7, respectively). Compared to non-mutation carriers, mutation carriers had more all-cause pharmacy claims over 2 years of follow-up (74.4 vs 59.1, p = 0.04) and more PC-specific pharmacy claims over 2 years (11.1 vs 6.5, p = 0.01) and 3 years (17.9 vs 9.8, p = 0.01) of follow-up. No differences were observed in outpatient resource use during the follow-up period by mutation status. Conclusion: PC patients carrying ≥1 pathogenic DNA instability mutation, and DRD mutation carriers specifically, had higher clinical burden than non-mutation carriers. Targeted therapies for these patients are needed to reduce clinical burden and associated healthcare resource utilization.


Assuntos
Instabilidade Genômica , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Mutação , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência Farmacêutica , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Idoso , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(4): 947-954, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30234407

RESUMO

Data are limited on the real-world utilization and costs of brentuximab vedotin (BV) among patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (rrHL) in the United States. A total of 219 BV patients identified from the Truven MarketScan® databases were followed up for a median of 2.9 years before and 1.0 year after initiation of BV. Of these patients, 109 (50.6%) received systemic therapy after BV (post-BV ST). Median duration of treatment was short for BV (2.1 months) and post-BV ST treatment (1.3 months); time to next treatment was 6.2 and 9.1 months, respectively. Average total US dollar 2014 costs/person for BV and post-BV ST line of therapy were $167,152 and $132,115, respectively; mean per-patient-per-month costs for BV and post-BV ST were $30,434 and $29,138, respectively. Findings underscore the unmet medical need and substantial economic burden in BV-treated patients with rrHL.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Recursos em Saúde , Doença de Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Brentuximab Vedotin/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Custos e Análise de Custo , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 34(6): 1061-1069, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29264933

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe patient and provider characteristics for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) initiating basal insulin and describe basal insulin's impact on sulfonylurea (SU) discontinuation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. Patients had ≥12 months of continuous coverage prior to initiating insulin, and were utilizing at least one anti-hyperglycemic drug at the time of insulin initiation. Predictors for SU discontinuation were evaluated utilizing Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among the 74,334 individuals aged ≥18 years with T2DM who initiated basal insulin from 2006-2015, 30% were taking metformin (MET) and SU when initiating insulin. Among the 22,418 MET/SU patients, 31% discontinued SU within 3 months of insulin initiation and, by 12 months, 55% had discontinued SU. Sulfonylurea discontinuation was similar among many patient and provider characteristics, while being modestly positively associated (p < .05; HRs <1.5) with female gender, more co-morbidities, cardiac revascularization, chronic liver disease, hospitalizations with a T2DM diagnosis, and hypoglycemia prior to insulin initiation. SU discontinuation was modestly inversely associated with receiving an insulin prescription from an endocrinologist (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Roughly half of commercially-insured T2DM patients discontinued SU within 1 year after insulin initiation, and SU discontinuation was not strongly associated with a range of patient and provider characteristics.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipoglicemia , Insulina , Compostos de Sulfonilureia , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemia/diagnóstico , Hipoglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Diabetes Complications ; 31(11): 1620-1623, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844830

RESUMO

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate diabetes-related healthcare resource use and associated costs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with a sulfonylurea (SU), with and without hypoglycemia. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients 18years or older receiving SU monotherapy or as add-on to metformin were identified from a US healthcare claims database (MarketScan®). Of 113,743 patients (56.8% male, average age 62.6years), 61.6% were on SU/metformin dual therapy and 38.4% were on SU monotherapy, and 5% had one or more episodes of hypoglycemia during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Adjusted for baseline characteristics, patients with hypoglycemia were three times more likely than those without to use emergency room services (OR 3.04, 95% CI: 2.82, 3.25), almost four times more likely to have inpatient admissions (OR 3.84, 95% CI: 3.58, 4.12), and had more frequent physician office visits (4.3 vs 3.0 visits, p<0.01) in the 12-month follow-up period. The adjusted annual diabetes-related medical expenditure was three times higher in patients with hypoglycemia compared with those without ($6884 vs $2392, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the higher healthcare utilization and costs associated with hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM treated with an SU.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Gastos em Saúde , Recursos em Saúde , Hipoglicemia/terapia , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Seguimentos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemia/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro , Masculino , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Metformina/economia , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aposentadoria , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/economia , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos
8.
Pain Physician ; 18(5): E781-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26431131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pain emanating from the sacroiliac (SI) joint can have variable radiation patterns. Single physical examination tests for SI joint pain are inconsistent with multiple tests increasing both sensitivity and specificity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of SI joint pain. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective double blind comparison study. SETTING: Pain clinic and radiology setting in urban Veterans Administration (VA) in New Orleans, Louisiana. METHODS: Twenty-two adult men, patients at a southeastern United States VA interventional pain clinic, presented with unilateral low back pain of more than 2 months' duration. Patients with previous back surgery were excluded from the study. Each patient was given a Gapping test, Patrick (FABERE) test, and Gaenslen test. A second blinded physician placed each patient prone under fluoroscopic guidance, asking each patient to point to the most painful area. Pain was provoked by applying pressure with the heel of the palm in that area to determine the point of maximum tenderness. The area was marked with a radio-opaque object and was placed on the mark with a fluoroscopic imgage. A site within 1 cm of the SI joint was considered as a positive test. This was followed by a diagnostic injection under fluoroscopy with 1 mL 2% lidocaine. A positive result was considered as more than 2 hours of greater than 75% reduction in pain. Then, in 2-3 days this was followed by a therapeutic injection under fluoroscopy with 1 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 40 mg methylprednisolone. RESULTS: Each patient was reassessed after 6 weeks. The sensitivity and specificity in addition to the positive and negative predictive values were determined for both the conventional examinations, as well as the examination under fluoroscopy. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate test performance. The sensitivity and specificity of the fluoroscopic examination were 0.82 and 0.80 respectively; Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.93 and 0.57 respectively. The area under ROC curve was 0.812 which is considered a "good" test; however the area under ROC for the conventional examination were between 0.52-0.58 which is considered "poor to fail". LIMITATIONS: Variation in anatomy of the SI joint, small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple structures of the SI joint complex can result in clinical symptoms of pain. These include intra-articular structures (degenerative arthritis, and inflammatory conditions) as well as extra-articular structures (ligaments, muscles, etc.).


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Fluoroscopia/normas , Artropatias/diagnóstico , Lidocaína , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Articulação Sacroilíaca/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Dor nas Costas/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
JAMA ; 312(23): 2542-50, 2014 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25494006

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Based on randomized evidence, expert guidelines in 2011 endorsed shorter, hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI) for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer and permitted hypofractionated WBI for other patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the uptake and costs of hypofractionated WBI among commercially insured patients in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective, observational cohort study, using administrative claims data from 14 commercial health care plans covering 7.4% of US adult women in 2013, we classified patients with incident early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and WBI from 2008 and 2013 into 2 cohorts: (1) the hypofractionation-endorsed cohort (n = 8924) included patients aged 50 years or older without prior chemotherapy or axillary lymph node involvement and (2) the hypofractionation-permitted cohort (n = 6719) included patients younger than 50 years or those with prior chemotherapy or axillary lymph node involvement. EXPOSURES: Hypofractionated WBI (3-5 weeks of treatment) vs conventional WBI (5-7 weeks of treatment). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Use of hypofractionated and conventional WBI, total and radiotherapy-related health care expenditures, and patient out-of-pocket expenses. Patient and clinical characteristics included year of treatment, age, comorbid disease, prior chemotherapy, axillary lymph node involvement, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, practice setting, and other contextual variables. RESULTS: Hypofractionated WBI increased from 10.6% (95% CI, 8.8%-12.5%) in 2008 to 34.5% (95% CI, 32.2%-36.8%) in 2013 in the hypofractionation-endorsed cohort and from 8.1% (95% CI, 6.0%-10.2%) in 2008 to 21.2% (95% CI, 18.9%-23.6%) in 2013 in the hypofractionation-permitted cohort. Adjusted mean total health care expenditures in the 1 year after diagnosis were $28,747 for hypofractionated and $31,641 for conventional WBI in the hypofractionation-endorsed cohort (difference, $2894; 95% CI, $1610-$4234; P < .001) and $64,273 for hypofractionated and $72,860 for conventional WBI in the hypofractionation-permitted cohort (difference, $8587; 95% CI, $5316-$12,017; P < .001). Adjusted mean total 1-year patient out-of-pocket expenses were not significantly different between hypofractionated vs conventional WBI in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hypofractionated WBI after breast conserving surgery increased among women with early-stage breast cancer in 14 US commercial health care plans between 2008 and 2013. However, only 34.5% of patients with hypofractionation-endorsed and 21.2% with hypofractionation-permitted early-stage breast cancer received hypofractionated WBI in 2013.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/economia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 30(9): 1707-13, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24809834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The management of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves two choices: (1) rate control versus rhythm control, and (2) anticoagulation treatment based upon risk of stroke. The objective of the study was to describe practice patterns in both of these treatment areas in patients with newly diagnosed AF among a commercially insured population. METHODS: This retrospective administrative claims analysis included patients with ≥2 AF claims between 1 January 2008 and 30 September 2010. Patients with AF claims within a year prior to the index date (i.e., the first AF diagnosis date) were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients treated with rate control (i.e., beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin) versus rhythm control (i.e., electrical cardioversion, left atrial catheter ablation [LACA], and/or surgical ablation) and the use of anticoagulants stratified by risk of stroke based on CHADS2 score. RESULTS: Of 48,814 patients with a diagnosis of AF, 38,502 (78.9%) received treatment. Of those treated, the majority received only pharmacologic treatment (73.4%), of which beta blockers were predominantly used in the initial regimen (66.7%). Antiarrhythmic drugs were used in 23.9% of patients, but within the initial regimen in only 11.7% of patients. Direct current cardioversion occurred in 18.2% of patients, with the majority being either first-line (8.5%) or second-line (9.1%) therapy. LACA was used in only 5.2% of patients and was typically reserved for use after pharmacologic treatment or direct current cardioversion. Of 1924 patients who received LACA, 14.6% received a repeat procedure and 53.4% of the repeat procedures occurred within 6 months of the initial one. A little more than half of all patients (57.0%) received anticoagulant therapy (predominantly warfarin); of those at high risk for stroke, 63.8% with a CHADS2 score ≥2 received anticoagulants. KEY LIMITATIONS: It is a retrospective analysis using administrative claims data from a commercially insured population only. Identification of the first episode of AF may be inaccurate, and we cannot differentiate between paroxysmal and persistent AF. CONCLUSIONS: Debate continues regarding whether the preferred management of most patients with AF is through rate control or restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Our retrospective study found that treatments to restore normal heart rhythm, including LACA, which could be considered aggressive initial treatment, were typically reserved as second- or third-line alternatives. Initial standard of care for the majority patients was beta blockers. Though use of anticoagulation may be higher than other observational studies, opportunities exist to increase treatment in high risk patients.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Ablação por Cateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardioversão Elétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
PLoS One ; 8(1): e53062, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23326382

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) provides health insurance coverage for rural populations in China. This study aimed to evaluate changes in household catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) due to chronic disease before and after the reimbursement policies for services of chronic disease were implemented to provide additional financial support. METHODS: The study used data from the household surveys conducted in Shandong Province and Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in 2006 and 2008. The study sample in village-level units was divided into two groups: 36 villages which implemented the NCMS reimbursement policies for chronic diseases as the intervention group, and 72 villages which did not as the control group. Health care expenditure of more than 40% of household's non-food expenditure was defined as a household with CHE (i.e., impoverishment). The conceptual framework was established based on the Andersen socio-behavioral model of health care utilization to explore how the NCMS reimbursement policies impacted health expenditures. A difference-in-difference model was employed to compare the change in the proportion of households incurring CHE due to chronic disease between the two groups over time. RESULTS: The households that participated in the NCMS were less likely to become impoverished (P<0.05). In addition, the households with both male household head and higher income level were protective factors to prevent CHE (P<0.05). Young households with preschool children suffered less from CHE (P<0.05). The effect of the NCMS reimbursement policies for chronic disease on the CHE was negative, yet not statistically significant (p = 0.814). CONCLUSIONS: The NCMS coverage showed financial protection for households with chronic disease. However, the NCMS reimbursement policies should be strengthened in the future.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/economia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Financiamento Governamental/economia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Algoritmos , China , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Saúde da População Rural/economia , Saúde da População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Int J Equity Health ; 11: 42, 2012 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22891984

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: China introduced the urban resident basic medical insurance (URBMI) in 2007 to cover children and urban unemployed adults, in addition to the new cooperative medical scheme (NCMS) for rural residents in 2003 and the basic health insurance scheme (BHIS) for urban employees in 1998. This study examined whether the overall income-related inequality in health insurance coverage improved during 2006 and 2009 in China. METHODS: The China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) data of 2006 and 2009 were used to create the concentration curve and the concentration index. GEE logistic regression was used to model the health insurance coverage as dependent variable and household income per capita as independent variable, controlling for individuals' age, gender, marital status, educational attainment, employment status, year 2009 (Y2009), household size, retirement status, and geographic variations. The change in the income-related inequality in 2009 was estimated using the interaction term of income*Y2009. RESULTS: In 2006, 49.7% (4,712/9,476) respondents had health insurance: 13.4% with BHIS and 28.4% with NCMS. In 2009, 90.8% (8,964/9,863) had health insurance: 10.1% with URBMI, 18.3% with BHIS, and 57.6% with NCMS. The BHIS, URBMI, and NCMS programs had different patterns of population coverage over 10 income deciles. The concentration index was 0.15 in 2006 and 0.04 in 2009. The dominance test showed that the concentration curves were significantly different between 2006 and 2009 (p < 0.05). An income increase per capita by 10,000 RMB was associated with 25.5% more likely to have health insurance coverage (odds ratio = 1.255, 95% confidence interval: [1.130-1.393]). In 2009, there was significant improvement in the income-related inequality (p < 0.001). DISCUSSIONS: Comparing 2009 to 2006, the income inequality in health insurance coverage was largely corrected in China through rapid expansion of CHNS in rural areas and initiation of URBMI in urban areas.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Política de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
13.
Int J Public Health ; 57(1): 193-8, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21503770

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the trends of out-of-pocket expenditure for influenza during 1989-2006 in China. METHODS: Data were extracted from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) during 1989-2006 (in seven waves). A fixed effect model with robust standard errors was employed to examine trends of out-of-pocket expenditure (adjusted to 2006 Chinese RMB). RESULTS: The out-of-pocket expenditure increased from 11.92 RMB in 1989 to 50.75 RMB in 2006. The final sample for fixed effect model was 23,050 households. Income elasticity of out-of-pocket expenditure was 1.6%. Using 1989 as reference, the predicted increase was 242.23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 225.79-259.50%] in 2006; it was 143.54% in city hospitals [95% CI: 130.43-157.40%] compared to village clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted for inflation and income elasticity, Chinese households experienced an increase of more than double the out-of-pocket expenditure during 1989-2006. The expenditure was higher in higher-level facilities. Policy implications include the government fixed-budget financing to health providers could contribute to the rapidly increased financial burden; a referral system should be rebuilt; private health providers may play an important role in containing healthcare price in China.


Assuntos
Financiamento Pessoal/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/economia , China , Intervalos de Confiança , Política de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 8: 99, 2010 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20836888

RESUMO

PURPOSE: It is vital to understand the associations between the medication event monitoring systems (MEMS) and self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) because both are often used to measure medication adherence and can produce different results. In addition, the economic implication of using alternative measures is important as the cost of electronic monitoring devices is not covered by insurance, while self-reports are the most practical and cost-effective method in the clinical settings. This meta-analysis examined the correlations of two measurements of medication adherence: MEMS and SRQs. METHODS: The literature search (1980-2009) used PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), OVID HealthStar, EMBASE (Elsevier), and Cochrane Databases. Studies were included if the correlation coefficients [Pearson (rp) or Spearman (rs)] between adherences measured by both MEMS and SRQs were available or could be calculated from other statistics in the articles. Data were independently abstracted in duplicate with standardized protocol and abstraction form including 1) first author's name; 2) year of publication; 3) disease status of participants; 4) sample size; 5) mean age (year); 6) duration of trials (month); 7) SRQ names if available; 8) adherence (%) measured by MEMS; 9) adherence (%) measured by SRQ; 10) correlation coefficient and relative information, including p-value, 95% confidence interval (CI). A meta-analysis was conducted to pool the correlation coefficients using random-effect model. RESULTS: Eleven studies (N = 1,684 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean of adherence measured by MEMS was 74.9% (range 53.4%-92.9%), versus 84.0% by SRQ (range 68.35%-95%). The correlation between adherence measured by MEMS and SRQs ranged from 0.24 to 0.87. The pooled correlation coefficient for 11 studies was 0.45 (p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.34-0.56). The subgroup meta-analysis on the seven studies reporting rp and four studies reporting rs reported the pooled correlation coefficient: 0.46 (p = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.33-0.59) and 0.43 (p = 0.0038, 95% CI: 0.23-0.64), respectively. No differences were found for other subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Medication adherence measured by MEMS and SRQs tends to be at least moderately correlated, suggesting that SRQs give a good estimate of medication adherence.


Assuntos
Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria/instrumentação , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Psicometria/economia
15.
Health Policy ; 86(2-3): 239-44, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18054112

RESUMO

From 2003, under the principle of raising fund in multiple ways and voluntarily jointing in by rural people, trial areas of new cooperative medical scheme (NCMS) are increasing year-by-year in China. Meanwhile, more and more farmers participate in NCMS with great enthusiasm. In this study, we examined the satisfaction about new cooperative medical scheme (NCMS) as well as the factors that had an influence on the attitudes towards NCMS. The sample, 4303 countryside residents aged > or =15-year, was randomly chosen by using stratified-cluster sampling method. Data were evaluated by using percentages, nonparametric tests and ordinal regression. As showed in this study, 73.2% of the subjects were satisfied with NCMS. According to the results of single factor analysis, the attitudes towards NCMS were affected by gender, age, self-rated health status, whether having received health check-ups, and hospital stay during 2006, the difference proving to be statistically significant (P<0.05). In the ordinal regression analysis, it was found that the following factors, age, self-rated health status, whether having received health check-ups, and hospital stay during 2006, had an influence on satisfaction (P<0.05).


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Comportamento Cooperativo , Organização do Financiamento/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , China , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA