Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 224(12 Suppl 2): S103-S112, 2021 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396411

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an infection of the upper genital tract that has important reproductive consequences to women. We describe the burden of and trends in PID among reproductive-aged women in the United States during 2006-2016. METHODS: We used data from 2 nationally representative probability surveys collecting self-reported PID history (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, National Survey of Family Growth); 5 datasets containing International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision codes indicating diagnosed PID (Healthcare Utilization Project; National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, emergency department component; National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Disease Therapeutic Index; MarketScan); and data from a network of sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics (Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Network). Trends during 2006-2016 were estimated overall, by age group and, if available, race/ethnicity, region, and prior STIs. RESULTS: An estimated 2 million reproductive-aged women self-reported a history of PID. Three of 4 nationally representative data sources showed overall declines in a self-reported PID history, and PID emergency department and physician office visits, with small increases observed in nearly all data sources starting around 2015. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of PID in the United States is high. Despite declines in burden over time, there is evidence of an increase in recent years.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(4): 538-545, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29417361

RESUMO

Introduction Screening for specific sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) during pregnancy has been a longstanding public health recommendation. Prior studies have described associations between these infections and socioeconomic factors such as race/ethnicity and education. Objectives We evaluated the prevalence of STDs and the correlation socioeconomic factors have with the presence of these infections among pregnant women in the United States. Methods We conducted an analysis using self-reported data from 12,948 recently pregnant women from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) in 5 states during 2009-2011. Responses to questions about curable STDs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, trichomoniasis) diagnosed during pregnancy were utilized to calculate weighted STD prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A logistic regression was also conducted to identify maternal socioeconomic characteristics significantly associated with STDs; results are displayed as adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR). The PRAMS protocol was approved at PRAMS participating sites and by CDC's Institutional Review Board. Results Overall, 3.3% (CI 2.9-3.7) reported ≥ 1 curable STD during her most recent pregnancy. The adjusted STD prevalence was higher among women with younger age (aPR, 2.4; CI 1.8-3.4), non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity (aPR, 3.3; CI 2.4-4.1), unmarried status (aPR, 2.1; CI 1.4-3.0), no college education (aPR, 1.4; CI 1.0-1.9), annual income < $25,000 (aPR, 2.0; CI 1.3-3.2), and no pre-pregnancy health insurance (aPR, 1.4; CI 1.1-1.8). Conclusions for Practice This is the largest study of prevalence of self-reported curable STDs among U.S. pregnant women. Differences in STD prevalence highlight the association between certain socioeconomic factors and the presence of STDs.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Gestantes , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/etiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Prevalência , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/etiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 45(4): 243-249, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29465702

RESUMO

To assess trends in Neisseria gonorrhoeae among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM), we reviewed existing and published gonorrhea surveillance data in the United States. Data identified in this review include the following: national gonorrhea case report data and data from 3 other surveillance programs, the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP), the STD Surveillance Network (SSuN), and National HIV Behavioral Surveillance.Rates of reported cases of gonorrhea among men increased 54.8% in 2006 to 2015 compared with a 2.6% increase among women. Since 2012, the rate of reported gonorrhea cases among men surpassed the rate among women; the male-to-female case rate ratio increased from 0.97 in 2012 to 1.31 in 2015. The proportion of gonococcal urethral isolates collected in the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project that were collected from MSM increased from 21.5% to 38.1% in 2006 to 2015. In 2009 to 2015, the percent of MSM who tested positive for rectal and oropharyngeal gonorrhea in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics increased by 73.4% and 12.6%, respectively. Estimated rates of gonorrhea among MSM increased by 151% in 2010 to 2015 in jurisdictions participating in the STD Surveillance Network. Data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance demonstrate that testing for gonorrhea among MSM increased by 23.1% between 2011 and 2014.Together, surveillance data suggest a disproportionate burden of gonorrhea among MSM in the United States and suggest increases in both screening and disease in recent years. Because each data source has inherent limitations and biases, examining these data from different systems together strengthens this conclusion.


Assuntos
Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Comportamento Sexual , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
JAMA ; 303(22): 2273-9, 2010 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20530781

RESUMO

CONTEXT: More than 5000 ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in the United States participate in the Medicare program. Little is known about infection control practices in ASCs. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) piloted an infection control audit tool in a sample of ASC inspections to assess facility adherence to recommended practices. OBJECTIVE: To describe infection control practices in a sample of ASCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All State Survey Agencies were invited to participate. Seven states volunteered; 3 were selected based on geographic dispersion, number of ASCs each state committed to inspect, and relative cost per inspection. A stratified random sample of ASCs was selected from each state. Sample size was based on the number of inspections each state estimated it could complete between June and October 2008. Sixty-eight ASCs were assessed; 32 in Maryland, 16 in North Carolina, and 20 in Oklahoma. Surveyors from CMS, trained in use of the audit tool, assessed compliance with specific infection control practices. Assessments focused on 5 areas of infection control: hand hygiene, injection safety and medication handling, equipment reprocessing, environmental cleaning, and handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of facilities with lapses in each infection control category. RESULTS: Overall, 46 of 68 ASCs (67.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55.9%-77.9%) had at least 1 lapse in infection control; 12 of 68 ASCs (17.6%; 95% CI, 9.9%-28.1%) had lapses identified in 3 or more of the 5 infection control categories. Common lapses included using single-dose medication vials for more than 1 patient (18/64; 28.1%; 95% CI, 18.2%-40.0%), failing to adhere to recommended practices regarding reprocessing of equipment (19/67; 28.4%; 95% CI, 18.6%-40.0%), and lapses in handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment (25/54; 46.3%; 95% CI, 33.4%-59.6%). CONCLUSION: Among a sample of US ASCs in 3 states, lapses in infection control were common.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Controle de Infecções/normas , Auditoria Médica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Reutilização de Equipamento , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Maryland , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , North Carolina , Oklahoma , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA