Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 17(9): 491-493, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756308

RESUMO

SARS-COV-2 infection has spread worldwide since it originated in December 2019, in Wuhan, China. The pandemic has largely demonstrated the resilience of the world's health systems and is the greatest health emergency since World War II. There is no single therapeutic approach to the treatment of COVID-19 and the associated immune disorder. The lack of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) has led different countries to tackle the disease based on case series, or from results of observational studies with off-label drugs. We as rheumatologists in general, and specifically rheumatology fellows, have been on the front line of the pandemic, modifying our activities and altering our training itinerary. We have attended patients, we have learned about the management of the disease and from our previous experience with drugs for arthritis and giant cell arteritis, we have used these drugs to treat COVID-19.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Papel do Médico , Reumatologistas , Doenças Autoimunes/complicações , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Saúde Global , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Infecções Oportunistas/complicações , Infecções Oportunistas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Oportunistas/imunologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica , Doenças Reumáticas/complicações , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Reumáticas/imunologia , Reumatologistas/educação , Reumatologistas/organização & administração , Reumatologia/educação , Reumatologia/métodos , Reumatologia/organização & administração , Espanha/epidemiologia
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(11)2021 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34071275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Different classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been launched over the years. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of the EULAR/ACR-2019, SLICC-2012 and ACR-1997 classification criteria in a cohort of SLE patients with longstanding disease. METHODS: Descriptive observational study in 79 patients with established and longstanding SLE. The three classification criteria sets were applied to those patients. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 70 were women (88.6%), with a mean age of 51.8 ± 14 years and a mean disease duration of 15.2 ± 11.5 years. The sensitivity of the different criteria were: 51.9%, 87.3% and 86.1% for ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019, respectively. In total, 68 out of 79 patients (53.7%) met all three classification criteria; 11.4% did not meet any classification criteria and were characterized by low SLEDAI (0.6 ± 0.9), low SLICC/ACR Damage Index (0.88 ± 0.56) and fulfilling only skin domains, antiphospholipid antibodies or hypocomplementemia. To fulfill EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria was associated with low complement levels (p < 0.04), high anti-dsDNA levels (p < 0.001), presence of lupus nephritis III-IV (p < 0.05) and arthritis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The EULAR/ACR-2019 classification criteria showed high sensitivity, similar to SLICC-2012, in SLE patients with longstanding disease. Patients with serological, articular or renal involvement are more likely to fulfill SLICC-2012 or EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA