Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Blood Rev ; 62: 101128, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37704469

RESUMO

The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes.


Assuntos
Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Medição de Risco , Qualidade de Vida , Prognóstico
2.
Am J Hematol ; 98(8): 1196-1203, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37183966

RESUMO

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR::ABL1 is the most common and widely accepted method of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL); however, RT-PCR may not be an optimal measure of MRD in many cases of Ph+ ALL. We evaluated the clinical impact of a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD assay (sensitivity of 10-6 ) and its correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1 in patients with Ph+ ALL. Overall, 32% of patients had a discordance between MRD assessment by RT-PCR and NGS, and 31% of patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity were PCR+ at the same timepoint. Among eight patients with long-term detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, six were PCR+/NGS-. These patients generally had stable PCR levels that persisted despite therapeutic interventions, and none subsequently relapsed; in contrast, patients who were PCR+/NGS+ had more variable PCR values that responded to therapeutic intervention. In a separate cohort of prospectively collected clinical samples, 11 of 65 patients (17%) with Ph+ ALL who achieved NGS MRD negativity had detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, and none of these patients relapsed. Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar in patients who were PCR+/NGS- and PCR-/NGS-, suggesting that PCR for BCR::ABL1 did not provide additional prognostic information in patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity. NGS-based assessment of MRD is prognostic in Ph+ ALL and identifies patients with low-level detectable BCR::ABL1 who are unlikely to relapse nor to benefit from therapeutic interventions.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Humanos , Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl/genética , Prognóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Residual/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Recidiva
5.
J Mol Diagn ; 21(1): 89-98, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30577887

RESUMO

Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based mutation panels profile multiple genes simultaneously, allowing the reporting of numerous genes while saving labor and resources. However, one drawback of using NGS is that the turnaround time is often longer than conventional single gene tests. This delay can be problematic if molecular results are required to guide therapy in patients with clinically aggressive diseases, such as acute myeloid leukemia. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel custom platform designated as Ultra-rapid Reporting of GENomic Targets (URGENTseq), an integrated solution that includes workflow optimization and an innovative custom bioinformatics pipeline to provide targeted NGS results on fresh peripheral blood and bone marrow samples within an actionable time period. URGENTseq was validated for clinical use by determining mutant allelic frequency and minimum coverage in silico to achieve 100% concordance for all positive and negative calls between the URGENTseq and conventional sequencing approach. URGENTseq enables the reporting of selected genes useful for immediate diagnosis (CALR, CSF3R, JAK2, KRAS, MPL, NPM1, NRAS, SF3B1) and treatment decisions (IDH1, IDH2) in hematologic malignancies within 48 hours of specimen collection. In addition, we summarize the molecular findings of the first 272 clinical test results performed using the URGENTseq platform.


Assuntos
Genômica/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Testes Genéticos/economia , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Variação Genética , Genômica/economia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/economia , Humanos , Nucleofosmina , Fatores de Tempo , Fluxo de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA