Frequent detection of functional hyposplenism via assessment of pitted erythrocytes in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Asplenia or functional hyposplenism are risk factors for severe infections, and vaccinations against encapsulated bacteria are advised. There are only limited data regarding the spleen function of cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We evaluated spleen function in patients with liver cirrhosis, who were prospectively enrolled in this study. Spleen function was evaluated by the measurement of pitted erythrocytes. Functional hyposplenism was defined as a percentage of PE of >15%. RESULTS: 117 patients, mean age 58.4 years and 61.5% (n = 72) male with liver cirrhosis were included. Functional hyposplenism was diagnosed in 28/117 patients (23.9%). Pitted erythrocytes correlated with albumin (p = 0.024), bilirubin (p<0.001), international normalized ratio (INR; p = 0.004), model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (p<0.001) and liver stiffness (p = 0.011). Patients with functional hyposplenism had higher MELD scores (median 13 vs. 10; p = 0.021), liver stiffness (46.4 kPa vs. 26.3 kPa; p = 0.011), INR (1.3 vs. 1.2; p = 0.008) and a higher Child-Pugh stage (Child C in 32.1% vs. 11.2%; p = 0.019) as compared to patients without functional hyposplenism. Functional hyposplenism was not associated with the etiology of cirrhosis. Importantly, 9/19 patients with Child C cirrhosis had functional hyposplenism. CONCLUSION: A quarter of patients with liver cirrhosis and almost 50% of patients with Child C cirrhosis have functional hyposplenism. Functional hyposplenism is associated with poor liver function and the degree of portal hypertension, which is characterized by higher liver stiffness measurements in transient elastography.

Second-line and third-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis: A position statement from the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group.

Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond well to standard immunosuppressive therapy with steroids and azathioprine, and while untreated disease is usually fatal, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. However, insufficient response to standard therapy or intolerable side effects requiring dose adaptions or treatment changes occur in 10-20% of patients. While there is fairly good agreement on second-line treatment options, there is very wide variation in the indication and use of possible third-line therapies. Herein, the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER) and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) outline a treatment algorithm for both children and adults that should help to standardise treatment approaches, in order to improve patient care and to enable the comparison of treatment results between scientific publications.

[Proton pump inhibitors in patients with liver cirrhosis - a survey among hepatologists in Germany]. / Einsatz von Protonenpumpenhemmern bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose ­ eine Umfrage unter Hepatologen in Deutschland.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are one of the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. In particular, in patients with liver cirrhosis prescription rates up to 78 % have been reported. PPI may be a risk factor for nosocomial infections, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and onset of hepatic encephalopathy. Aim of this survey was to assess the prescription practice of PPI in patients with cirrhosis in Germany. METHODS: We performed a web-based survey among hepatologists and gastroenterologists. The invitations for the survey have been sent out via the newsletter of German gastroenterological societies (DGVS, BVGD and AUG). RESULTS: 61 persons have participated in the survey. Overall, high PPI prescription rates have been reported (58 % in inpatient and 44 % in outpatient setting). Almost half of the respondents reported that PPI are frequently prescribed without clear indication (such as abdominal discomfort). One third reported that the PPI therapy could be stopped after critical evaluation of the indication. 55 % of the respondents stated that according to their estimates PPI are associated with adverse reactions. Bleeding was only very rarely seen after termination of PPI treatment. CONCLUSION: PPI are frequently prescribed among patients with liver cirrhosis in Germany. Prescribers are aware of an unclear risk-benefit ratio. Further prospective data are urgently needed to increase evidence regarding indication and duration of PPI therapy in patients with cirrhosis.

Inequity of care provision and outcome disparity in autoimmune hepatitis in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Treatment paradigms in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have remained largely unchanged for decades. Studies report ≤20% of patients have sub-optimal treatment response with most requiring long-term therapy. AIM: The United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis (UK-AIH) study was established to evaluate current treatment practice and outcomes, determine the unmet needs of patients, and develop and implement improved treatment approaches. METHODS: The United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis study is a cross-sectional cohort study examining secondary care management of prevalent adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Enrolment began in March 2014. Prevalent cases were defined as having been diagnosed and treated for >1 year. Demographic data, biochemistry, treatment history and response, and care location were collected. RESULTS: In total, 1249 patients were recruited; 635 were cared for in transplant units and 614 in non-transplant centres (81% female with median age at diagnosis 50 years). Overall, 29 treatment regimens were reported and biochemical remission rate was 59%. Remission rates were significantly higher in transplant compared to non-transplant centres (62 vs 55%, P = 0.028). 55% have ongoing corticosteroid exposure; 9% are receiving prednisolone monotherapy. Those aged ≤20 years at diagnosis were more likely to develop cirrhosis and place of care was associated with an aggressive disease phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant discrepancies in the care received by patients with autoimmune hepatitis in the UK. A high proportion remains on corticosteroids and there is significant treatment variability. Patients receiving care in transplant centres were more likely to achieve and maintain remission. Overall poor remission rates suggest that there are significant unmet therapeutic needs for patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

Scoring systems for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis: past, present, and future.

The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) can be challenging due to the variable clinical and laboratory findings. The original diagnostic criteria published in 1993 by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) were revised in 1999 in an attempt to standardize the diagnosis. However, these criteria are complex and can be cumbersome in clinical practice. In 2008, simplified diagnostic criteria were reported to facilitate the bedside diagnosis of AIH. The scoring systems have been evaluated in several retrospective case series and tested for their ability to reliably diagnose and exclude AIH. However, the scoring systems did not fare as well in patients with concomitant cholestatic disease, fatty liver disease, fulminant hepatitis, and pediatric patients. Both positive and negative predictive values are low in these patients. Prospective studies are needed to compare the two scoring systems to determine which (if not all) patients require liver biopsy and which patients would benefit from immunotherapy.

Liver assessment and biopsy in patients with marked coagulopathy: value of mini-laparoscopy and control of bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of liver disease in patients with a high risk of postbiopsy bleeding presents a diagnostic challenge. Mini-laparoscopy offers the possibility of coagulation of biopsy site and the additional advantage of macroscopic liver assessment. We wished to assess the value and safety of mini-laparoscopy with guided biopsy as a diagnostic approach in patients in whom percutaneous liver biopsy is considered contraindicated because of a marked coagulopathy. METHODS: We investigated 61 consecutive patients with marked coagulopathy (prolonged international normalized ratio > 1.5, thrombocytopenia < 50/nl, or both; von Willebrand's disease/hemophilia). Diagnostic mini-laparoscopy with visually guided liver biopsy was undertaken for the evaluation of liver disease. Biopsy sites were coagulated prophylactically (n = 4) or therapeutically (n = 52). Safety, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic consequences were assessed. RESULTS: Macroscopic assessment of the liver was possible in 60/61 high-risk patients and was considered diagnostic in 1/61. In 58 of the remaining 60 patients, liver biopsy was technically feasible. There was no persistent postbiopsy bleeding. One patient with fulminant hepatic failure had self-limiting bleeding from the abdominal wall. Ninety-seven percent of the biopsies were of adequate size for diagnostic histological evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-laparoscopy with guided liver biopsy allows reliable and safe evaluation of liver disease in patients with severe coagulopathy.