Report on ISCTM Consensus Meeting on Clinical Assessment of Response to Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia.

If treatments for cognitive impairment are to be utilized successfully, clinicians must be able to determine whether they are effective and which patients should receive them. In order to develop consensus on these issues, the International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM) held a meeting of experts on March 20, 2014, in Washington, DC. Consensus was reached on several important issues. Cognitive impairment and functional disability were viewed as equally important treatment targets. The group supported the notion that sufficient data are not available to exclude patients from available treatments on the basis of age, severity of cognitive impairment, severity of positive symptoms, or the potential to benefit functionally from treatment. The group reached consensus that cognitive remediation is likely to provide substantial benefits in combination with procognitive medications, although a substantial minority believed that medications can be administered without nonpharmacological therapy. There was little consensus on the best methods for assessing cognitive change in clinical practice. Some participants supported the view that performance-based measures are essential for measurement of cognitive change; others pointed to their cost and time requirements as evidence of impracticality. Interview-based measures of cognitive and functional change were viewed as more practical, but lacking validity without informant involvement or frequent contact from clinicians. The lack of consensus on assessment methods was viewed as attributable to differences in experience and education among key stakeholders and significant gaps in available empirical data. Research on the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and practicality of competing methods will facilitate consensus.

Impact of geographical and cultural factors on clinical trials in acute mania: lessons from a ziprasidone and haloperidol placebo-controlled study.

Clinical trials today are conducted in multiple countries to enhance patient recruitment and improve efficiency of trials. However, the demographic and cultural diversity may contribute to variations in study outcomes. Here we conducted post-hoc analyses for a placebo-controlled study with ziprasidone and haloperidol for the treatment of acute mania to address the demographic, dosing, and outcome disparities in India, Russia and the USA. We compared the baseline characteristics, outcomes and discontinuations in patients and explored the relationship between the outcome measures across these countries. We found substantial differences in baseline characteristics of subjects, administered dosage and disease severity in India compared to the USA and Russia. Conversely, US subjects had a higher placebo response compared to subjects in Russia and India. These results are probably due to demographic differences in patient populations and psychiatric clinical practice across countries. While we offer initial ideas to address the disparities identified in this analysis, it is clear that further research to improve our understanding of geographical differences is essential to ensure globally applicable results for clinical trials in psychiatry.

Metabolic risk status and second-generation antipsychotic drug selection: a retrospective study of commercially insured patients.

BACKGROUND: Routine metabolic screening and consideration of patient metabolic status in the choice of a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication are recommended. This study evaluated the association between abnormal blood glucose and lipid values and SGA prescribing patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using administrative data from 2 managed care plans in the United States evaluated 7904 adults initiating SGA therapy between 2001 and 2004. Baseline serum glucose, total cholesterol, and triglyceride values were available for 989 patients (12.5%), and follow-up assessments were done in 699 patients (8.8%). Abnormal values were defined as the following: total cholesterol, 200 mg/dL or higher; triglycerides, 200 mg/dL or higher; and glucose, 126 mg/dL or higher. The likelihood of abnormal laboratory values being associated with selection of a lower metabolic risk SGA drug (aripiprazole or ziprasidone) and with switching decisions was assessed using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of the patients had glucose and lipid tests within 6 months of starting SGA therapy. The likelihood of starting a patient on an SGA drug with lower metabolic risk (ziprasidone: odds ratio, 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-8.47; aripiprazole: odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-5.88) was higher if the patient had elevated glucose values but was not associated with elevated cholesterol or triglyceride values or if the patient had preexisting diabetes or dyslipidemia. Abnormal glucose and lipid values were not associated with switching SGA medications in the first 6 months of therapy. Among patients who did switch SGA medications, elevated glucose and lipid values were not associated with a greater likelihood of switching to aripiprazole or ziprasidone. CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of recommended monitoring were observed. Abnormal metabolic parameters among those who were tested were not consistently associated with the selection of an SGA drug with lower metabolic risk.