Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 3(8): e0002087, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616192

RESUMO

Point-of-care assays have greatly increased access to diagnostic information and improved healthcare outcomes globally, especially in the case of tropical diseases in rural settings. Increased recognition of the impact of these tools and increased funding, along with advances in technology have led to a surge in development of new assays. However, many new tools fail to fulfill their intended purpose due to a lack of clinical impact, operational feasibility, and input from envisioned operators. To be successful, they must fit into existing clinical decision-making models and be designed in collaboration with end users. We describe a case study of the development of a new low-cost sensor for antimalarial drugs, from initial planning through collection and incorporation of design feedback to final assay design. The assay uses an aptamer-based sensor to detect antimalarial drugs from patient samples for tracking antimalarial use in Southeast Asia, a region with a long history of emerging antimalarial drug resistance. Design and use-case input was collected from malaria control experts, researchers, and healthcare workers to develop target product profiles. Data was collected via surveys and in-person interviews during assay development and ultimately informed a change in assay format. This aptamer sensor platform can be easily adapted to detect other small molecule and protein targets and the design process described here can serve as a model for the development of effective new assays to improve access to healthcare technology.

2.
Malar J ; 22(1): 159, 2023 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37208733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For blood-stage malaria vaccine development, the in vitro growth inhibition assay (GIA) has been widely used to evaluate functionality of vaccine-induced antibodies (Ab), and Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (RH5) is a leading blood-stage antigen. However, precision, also called "error of assay (EoA)", in GIA readouts and the source of EoA has not been evaluated systematically. METHODS: In the Main GIA experiment, 4 different cultures of P. falciparum 3D7 parasites were prepared with red blood cells (RBC) collected from 4 different donors. For each culture, 7 different anti-RH5 Ab (either monoclonal or polyclonal Ab) were tested by GIA at two concentrations on three different days (168 data points). To evaluate sources of EoA in % inhibition in GIA (%GIA), a linear model fit was conducted including donor (source of RBC) and day of GIA as independent variables. In addition, 180 human anti-RH5 polyclonal Ab were tested in a Clinical GIA experiment, where each Ab was tested at multiple concentrations in at least 3 independent GIAs using different RBCs (5,093 data points). The standard deviation (sd) in %GIA and in GIA50 (Ab concentration that gave 50%GIA) readouts, and impact of repeat assays on 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of these readouts was estimated. RESULTS: The Main GIA experiment revealed that the RBC donor effect was much larger than the day effect, and an obvious donor effect was also observed in the Clinical GIA experiment. Both %GIA and log-transformed GIA50 data reasonably fit a constant sd model, and sd of %GIA and log-transformed GIA50 measurements were calculated as 7.54 and 0.206, respectively. Taking the average of three repeat assays (using three different RBCs) reduces the 95%CI width in %GIA or in GIA50 measurements by ~ half compared to a single assay. CONCLUSIONS: The RBC donor effect (donor-to-donor variance on the same day) in GIA was much bigger than the day effect (day-to-day variance using the same donor's RBC) at least for the RH5 Ab evaluated in this study; thus, future GIA studies should consider the donor effect. In addition, the 95%CI for %GIA and GIA50 shown here help when comparing GIA results from different samples/groups/studies; therefore, this study supports future malaria blood-stage vaccine development.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Malária Falciparum , Humanos , Plasmodium falciparum , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários , Malária Falciparum/parasitologia , Eritrócitos/parasitologia , Anticorpos Antivirais , Antígenos de Protozoários
3.
Parasit Vectors ; 10(1): 489, 2017 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29041962

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the increasing interest in vaccines to interrupt malaria transmission, there is a demand for harmonization of current methods to assess Plasmodium transmission in laboratory settings. Potential vaccine candidates are currently tested in the standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA) that commonly relies on Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. Other mosquito species including Anopheles gambiae are the dominant malaria vectors for Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Using human serum and monoclonal pre-fertilization (anti-Pfs48/45) and post-fertilization (anti-Pfs25) antibodies known to effectively inhibit sporogony, we directly compared SMFA based estimates of transmission-reducing activity (TRA) for An. stephensi and An. gambiae mosquitoes. RESULTS: In the absence of transmission-reducing antibodies, average numbers of oocysts were similar between An. gambiae and An. stephensi. Antibody-mediated TRA was strongly correlated between both mosquito species, and absolute TRA estimates for pre-fertilisation monoclonal antibodies (mAb) showed no significant difference between the two species. TRA estimates for IgG of naturally exposed individuals and partially effective concentrations of anti-Pfs25 mAb were higher for An. stephensi than for An. gambiae. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of An. stephensi in the SMFA for target prioritization. As a vaccine moves through product development, better estimates of TRA and transmission-blocking activity (TBA) may need to be obtained in epidemiologically relevant parasite-species combination.


Assuntos
Anopheles/parasitologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/transmissão , Plasmodium falciparum/fisiologia , Animais , Anopheles/fisiologia , Humanos , Imunidade , Malária Falciparum/parasitologia , Oocistos
4.
Front Immunol ; 8: 1998, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29403479

RESUMO

A malaria transmission-blocking vaccine would be a critical tool in achieving malaria elimination and eradication. By using chimpanzee adenovirus serotype 63 and modified vaccinia virus Ankara viral vectored vaccines, we investigated whether incorporating two antigens into one vaccine would result in higher transmission-reducing activity than one antigen. We demonstrated that when Pfs25 was administered with other antigens Pfs28 or Pfs230C, either concurrently as a mixed vaccine or co-expressed as a dual-antigen vaccine, the antibody response in mice to each antigen was comparable to a monoantigen vaccine, without immunological interference. However, we found that the transmission-reducing activity (functional activity) of dual-antigen vaccines was not additive. Dual-antigen vaccines generally only elicited similar transmission-reducing activity to monoantigen vaccines and in one instance had lower transmission-reducing activity. We found that despite the lack of immunological interference of dual-antigen vaccines, they are still not as effective at blocking malaria transmission as Pfs25-IMX313, the current leading candidate for viral vectored vaccines. Pfs25-IMX313 elicited similar quality antibodies to dual-antigen vaccines, but higher antibody titers.

5.
Sci Rep ; 5: 11193, 2015 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063320

RESUMO

Malaria transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs) target the development of Plasmodium parasites within the mosquito, with the aim of preventing malaria transmission from one infected individual to another. Different vaccine platforms, mainly protein-in-adjuvant formulations delivering the leading candidate antigens, have been developed independently and have reported varied transmission-blocking activities (TBA). Here, recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus 63, ChAd63, and modified vaccinia virus Ankara, MVA, expressing AgAPN1, Pfs230-C, Pfs25, and Pfs48/45 were generated. Antibody responses primed individually against all antigens by ChAd63 immunization in BALB/c mice were boosted by the administration of MVA expressing the same antigen. These antibodies exhibited a hierarchy of inhibitory activity against the NF54 laboratory strain of P. falciparum in Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes using the standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA), with anti-Pfs230-C and anti-Pfs25 antibodies giving complete blockade. The observed rank order of inhibition was replicated against P. falciparum African field isolates in A. gambiae in direct membrane feeding assays (DMFA). TBA achieved was IgG concentration dependent. This study provides the first head-to-head comparative analysis of leading antigens using two different parasite sources in two different vector species, and can be used to guide selection of TBVs for future clinical development using the viral-vectored delivery platform.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Malária Falciparum/transmissão , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Animais , Anopheles/genética , Anopheles/imunologia , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Antígenos de Protozoários/genética , Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Culicidae/genética , Culicidae/imunologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Vetores Genéticos/genética , Humanos , Imunização , Imunoglobulina G , Vacinas Antimaláricas/genética , Camundongos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão
6.
PLoS One ; 9(9): e107903, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25254500

RESUMO

The development of protective vaccines against many difficult infectious pathogens will necessitate the induction of effective antibody responses. Here we assess humoral immune responses against two antigens from the blood-stage merozoite of the Plasmodium falciparum human malaria parasite--MSP1 and AMA1. These antigens were delivered to healthy malaria-naïve adult volunteers in Phase Ia clinical trials using recombinant replication-deficient viral vectors--ChAd63 to prime the immune response and MVA to boost. In subsequent Phase IIa clinical trials, immunized volunteers underwent controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with P. falciparum to assess vaccine efficacy, whereby all but one volunteer developed low-density blood-stage parasitemia. Here we assess serum antibody responses against both the MSP1 and AMA1 antigens following i) ChAd63-MVA immunization, ii) immunization and CHMI, and iii) primary malaria exposure in the context of CHMI in unimmunized control volunteers. Responses were also assessed in a cohort of naturally-immune Kenyan adults to provide comparison with those induced by a lifetime of natural malaria exposure. Serum antibody responses against MSP1 and AMA1 were characterized in terms of i) total IgG responses before and after CHMI, ii) responses to allelic variants of MSP1 and AMA1, iii) functional growth inhibitory activity (GIA), iv) IgG avidity, and v) isotype responses (IgG1-4, IgA and IgM). These data provide the first in-depth assessment of the quality of adenovirus-MVA vaccine-induced antibody responses in humans, along with assessment of how these responses are modulated by subsequent low-density parasite exposure. Notable differences were observed in qualitative aspects of the human antibody responses against these malaria antigens depending on the means of their induction and/or exposure of the host to the malaria parasite. Given the continued clinical development of viral vectored vaccines for malaria and a range of other diseases targets, these data should help to guide further immuno-monitoring studies of vaccine-induced human antibody responses.


Assuntos
Adenoviridae/imunologia , Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Imunidade Humoral/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Adenoviridae/genética , Animais , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Sangue/parasitologia , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/biossíntese , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/genética , Malária Falciparum/sangue , Malária Falciparum/imunologia , Pan troglodytes , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Plasmodium falciparum/fisiologia , Especificidade da Espécie , Vaccinia virus/genética
7.
Mol Ther ; 20(12): 2355-68, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089736

RESUMO

The induction of cellular immunity, in conjunction with antibodies, may be essential for vaccines to protect against blood-stage infection with the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. We have shown that prime-boost delivery of P. falciparum blood-stage antigens by chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) followed by the attenuated orthopoxvirus MVA is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults. Here, we report on vaccine efficacy against controlled human malaria infection delivered by mosquito bites. The blood-stage malaria vaccines were administered alone, or together (MSP1+AMA1), or with a pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine candidate (MSP1+ME-TRAP). In this first human use of coadministered ChAd63-MVA regimes, we demonstrate immune interference whereby responses against merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1) are dominant over apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and ME-TRAP. We also show that induction of strong cellular immunity against MSP1 and AMA1 is safe, but does not impact on parasite growth rates in the blood. In a subset of vaccinated volunteers, a delay in time to diagnosis was observed and sterilizing protection was observed in one volunteer coimmunized with MSP1+AMA1-results consistent with vaccine-induced pre-erythrocytic, rather than blood-stage, immunity. These data call into question the utility of T cell-inducing blood-stage malaria vaccines and suggest that the focus should remain on high-titer antibody induction against susceptible antigen targets.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Protozoários/imunologia , Culicidae/parasitologia , Culicidae/patogenicidade , Vacinas Antimaláricas/uso terapêutico , Proteína 1 de Superfície de Merozoito/imunologia , Adenovirus dos Símios/genética , Animais , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Malária Falciparum/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Orthopoxvirus/imunologia , Pan troglodytes/virologia
8.
Acta Trop ; 121(3): 166-74, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22119584

RESUMO

The study sites for the West African ICEMR are in three countries (The Gambia, Senegal, Mali) and are located within 750 km of each other. In addition, the National Malaria Control Programmes of these countries have virtually identical policies: (1) Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of symptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infection, (2) Long-Lasting Insecticide-treated bed Nets (LLINs) to reduce the Entomololgic Inoculation Rate (EIR), and (3) sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the Intermittent Preventive Treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp). However, the prevalence of P. falciparum malaria and the status of malaria control vary markedly across the four sites with differences in the duration of the transmission season (from 4-5 to 10-11 months), the intensity of transmission (with EIRs from unmeasurably low to 4-5 per person per month), multiplicity of infection (from a mean of 1.0 to means of 2-5) and the status of malaria control (from areas which have virtually no control to areas that are at the threshold of malaria elimination). The most important priority is the need to obtain comparable data on the population-based prevalence, incidence and transmission of malaria before new candidate interventions or combinations of interventions are introduced for malaria control.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , África Ocidental/epidemiologia , Animais , Antimaláricos/farmacologia , Artemisininas/farmacologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Culicidae/efeitos dos fármacos , Culicidae/parasitologia , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/parasitologia , Mosquiteiros Tratados com Inseticida , Inseticidas/farmacologia , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia , Malária Falciparum/parasitologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Plasmodium falciparum/patogenicidade , Gravidez , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/parasitologia , Complicações Parasitárias na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Pirimetamina/uso terapêutico , Estações do Ano , Sulfadoxina/uso terapêutico
9.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 74(2): 215-21, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16474073

RESUMO

Macaca mulatta monkeys were immunized with the candidate transmission-blocking vaccine against Plasmodium vivax, Pvs25, combined with alum or Montanide ISA 720. Efficacy was measured by combining post-immunization sera with gametocytes obtained from infections induced in chimpanzees using membrane-feeding techniques. The results indicate that immunization of M. mulatta monkeys with Pvs25 and Montanide ISA 720 was more effective than with alum in efficacy and resulted in the maintenance of a lasting transmission-blocking immunity to P. vivax. This was evident two weeks after the second immunization, and more strongly demonstrable 62 and 152 days after the second immunization. This transmission-blocking activity was strongly reinforced by a third immunization given 181 days after the primary immunization, as measured three weeks later by indirect membrane feeding. The use of gametocytes of P. vivax derived from infections induced in chimpanzees can contribute to the selection of appropriate constructs, formulations, and immunization regimens for the development of effective transmission-blocking vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Malária Vivax/transmissão , Plasmodium vivax/imunologia , Compostos de Alúmen , Animais , Anopheles , Antígenos de Protozoários , Antígenos de Superfície , Feminino , Células Germinativas/citologia , Macaca mulatta , Malária Vivax/imunologia , Malária Vivax/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Manitol/análogos & derivados , Óleos , Ácidos Oleicos , Vacinas Combinadas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA