National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on monitoring and management of Barrett's oesophagus and stage I oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Barrett's oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett's oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett's oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett's-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment.

Management of early colonic neoplasia: where are we now and where are we heading?

INTRODUCTION: There have been considerable advances in the endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplasia. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection and full thickness resection techniques is changing the way benign disease and early cancers are managed. This article reviews the evidence behind these new techniques and discusses where this field is likely to move in the future. Areas covered: A PubMed literature review of resection techniques for colonic neoplasia was performed. The clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is examined. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and knife assisted resection is described and issues around training reviewed. Efficacy is compared to both EMR and transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The future is considered, including full thickness resection techniques and robotic endoscopy. Expert commentary: The perceived barriers to ESD are falling, and views that such techniques are only possible in Japan are disappearing. The key barriers to uptake will be training, and the development of educational programmes should be seen as a priority. The debate between TEMS and ESD will continue, but ESD is more flexible and cheaper. This will become less significant as the number of endoscopists trained in ESD grows and some TEMS surgeons may shift across towards ESD.

Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and indigo carmine in neoplasia diagnosis during colonoscopy: a large prospective UK series.

OBJECTIVES: At present, all colonic polyps are removed and sent for histopathological evaluation, resulting in laboratory and reporting costs. Recent American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines have set standards for in-vivo diagnosis in place of conventional histopathology, and all future technologies will have to be tested against these standards. Data on flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) were very limited. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of FICE and indigo carmine (IC) for in-vivo histology prediction for polyps of less than 10 mm in size and to assess the economic impact of this strategy. METHODS: In a screening population, polyps of less than 10 mm were assessed using white light (WLI) by FICE, by IC, and the predicted diagnosis was recorded. Polyps were then removed and sent for histological analysis. Accuracy of the predicted rescope interval was calculated using British Society of Gastroenterology and ASGE guidelines. Two models for using in-vivo diagnosis were proposed and savings in terms of histopathology costs calculated. RESULTS: A total of 232 polyps of less than 10 mm were examined. FICE improved the accuracy of in-vivo diagnosis of adenoma to 88% compared with 75% with WLI (P<0.0001). IC after FICE improved this further to 94%. Rescope interval could be set correctly using FICE or IC in 97% of cases by British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines or 97% with FICE and 99% with IC using ASGE guidelines. A saving of £678,253 (€762767) per annum could be made within the UK national screening population. CONCLUSION: FICE and IC significantly improves the in-vivo diagnosis of colonic polyps over WLI and can lead to significant cost savings.