Cost-Related Access Barriers, Medical Debt, and Dissatisfaction with Care Among Privately Insured Americans.

BACKGROUND: Understanding experiences with private important to improving the quality of health care coverage. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of health with cost-related access barriers, medical debt, and dissatisfaction with care among privately insured Americans. DESIGN: We classified Americans with private insurance by self-reported health status into five groups (excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor health). We examined self-reported difficulty seeing a doctor due to costs, not taking medications due to costs, medical debt, and dissatisfaction with care among individuals with differing health status. We used logistic regression to examine the association of health status with individuals' experiences after accounting for baseline characteristics. The analysis was repeated among individuals with different forms of private insurance. Odds ratios were converted to risk ratios to improve ease of interpretation of the results. SETTING: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System of Americans in 17 states RESULTS: The sample included 82,494 US adults with private insurance. Following adjustment, compared to individuals with excellent health those in very good health, good health, fair health, and poor health reported increasingly higher risks of difficulty seeing a doctor due to costs with risk ratios of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01, 1.03), 1.07 (95% CI 1.06, 1.08), 1.18 (95% CI 1.17, 1.20), and 1.29 (95% CI 1.27, 1.31), respectively. Compared to individuals with excellent health, those in very good health, good health, fair health, and poor health reported increasingly higher risks of not taking medication due to costs, outstanding medical debt, and dissatisfaction with care. Similar relationships were seen across individually purchased and employer-sponsored insurance. CONCLUSION: Cost-related access barriers, medical debt, and dissatisfaction with care were common among individuals with private insurance and most pronounced among those with fair and poor health who likely need and use their health insurance the most.

Association of Social Determinants of Health and Their Cumulative Impact on Hospitalization Among a National Sample of Community-Dwelling US Adults.

IMPORTANCE: While the association between Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) and health outcomes is well known, few studies have explored the impact of SDOH on hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: Examine the independent association and cumulative effect of six SDOH domains on hospitalization. DESIGN: Using cross-sectional data from the 2016-2018 National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS), we used multivariable logistical regression models controlling for sociodemographics and comorbid conditions to assess the association of each SDOH and SDOH burden (i.e., cumulative number of SDOH) with hospitalization. SETTING: National survey of community-dwelling individuals in the US PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥18 years who responded to the NHIS survey EXPOSURE: Six SDOH domains (economic instability, lack of community, educational deficits, food insecurity, social isolation, and inadequate access to medical care) MEASURES: Hospitalization within 1 year RESULTS: Among all 55,186 respondents, most were ≤50 years old (54.2%), female (51.7%, 95% CI 51.1-52.3), non-Hispanic (83.9%, 95% CI 82.4-84.5), identified as White (77.9%, 95% CI 76.8-79.1), and had health insurance (90%, 95% CI 88.9-91.9). Hospitalized individuals (n=5506; 8.7%) were more likely to be ≥50 years old (61.2%), female (60.7%, 95% CI 58.9-62.4), non-Hispanic (87%, 95% CI 86.2-88.4), and identify as White (78.5%, 95% CI 76.7-80.3), compared to those who were not hospitalized. Hospitalized individuals described poorer overall health, reporting higher incidence of having ≥5 comorbid conditions (38.9%, 95% CI 37.1-40.1) compared to those who did not report a hospitalization (15.9%, 95% CI 15.4-16.5). Hospitalized respondents reported higher rates of economic instability (33%), lack of community (14%), educational deficits (67%), food insecurity (14%), social isolation (34%), and less access to health care (6%) compared to non-hospitalized individuals. In adjusted analysis, food insecurity (OR: 1.36, 95% CI 1.22-1.52), social isolation (OR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26), and lower educational attainment (OR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.25) were associated with hospitalization, while a higher SDOH burden was associated with increased odds of hospitalization (3-4 SDOH [OR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.06-1.49] and ≥5 SDOH [OR: 1.72, 95% CI 1.40-2.06]) compared to those who reported no SDOH. CONCLUSIONS: Among community-dwelling US adults, three SDOH domains: food insecurity, social isolation, and low educational attainment increase an individual's risk of hospitalization. Additionally, risk of hospitalization increases as SDOH burden increases.

Increasing Equity While Improving the Quality of Care: JACC Focus Seminar 9/9.

This review summarizes racial and ethnic disparities in the quality of cardiovascular care-a challenge given the fragmented nature of the health care delivery system and measurement. Health equity for all racial and ethnic groups will not be achieved without a substantially different approach to quality measurement and improvement. The authors adapt a tool frequently used in quality improvement work-the driver diagram-to chart likely areas for diagnosing root causes of disparities and developing and testing interventions. This approach prioritizes equity in quality improvement. The authors demonstrate how this approach can be used to create interventions that reduce systemic racism within the institutions and professions that deliver health care; attends more aggressively to social factors related to race and ethnicity that affect health outcomes; and examines how hospitals, health systems, and insurers can generate effective partnerships with the communities they serve to achieve equitable cardiovascular outcomes.

The Hispanic paradox in the prevalence of obesity at the county-level.

OBJECTIVE: The percentage of Hispanics in a county has a negative association with prevalence of obesity. Because Hispanic individuals are unevenly distributed in the United States, this study examined whether this protective association persists when stratifying counties into quartiles based on the size of the Hispanic population and after adjusting for county-level demographic, socioeconomic, healthcare, and environmental factors. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2018 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings. Counties were categorized into quartiles based on their percentage of Hispanics, 0%-5% (n = 1794), 5%-20% (n = 962), 20%-50% (n = 283), and >50% (n = 99). For each quartile, univariate and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association between prevalence of obesity and demographic, socioeconomic, healthcare, and environmental factors. RESULTS: Counties with the top quartile of Hispanic individuals had the lowest prevalence of obesity compared to counties at the bottom quartile (28.4 ± 3.6% vs. 32.7 ± 4.0%). There was a negative association between county-level percentage of Hispanics and prevalence of obesity in unadjusted analyses that persisted after adjusting for all county-level factors. CONCLUSIONS: Counties with a higher percentage of Hispanics have lower levels of obesity, even after controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, healthcare, and environmental factors. More research is needed to elucidate why having more Hispanics in a county may be protective against county-level obesity.

Examining the Utility of 30-day Readmission Rates and Hospital Profiling in the Veterans Health Administration.

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) reports hospital-specific 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs) using CMS-derived models. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine and describe the interfacility variability of 30-day RSRRs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia as a means to assess its utility for VA quality improvement and hospital comparison. RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of VA and Medicare claims data using one-year (2012) and three-year (2010-2012) data given their use for quality improvement or for hospital comparison, respectively. SUBJECTS: This study included 3,571 patients hospitalized for AMI at 56 hospitals, 10,609 patients hospitalized for HF at 102 hospitals, and 10,191 patients hospitalized for pneumonia at 106 hospitals. MEASURES: Hospital-specific 30-day RSRRs for AMI, HF, and pneumonia hospitalizations were calculated using hierarchical generalized linear models. RESULTS: Of 164 qualifying VA hospitals, 56 (34%), 102 (62%), and 106 (64%) qualified for analysis based on CMS criteria for AMI, HF, and pneumonia cohorts, respectively. Using 2012 data, we found that two hospitals (2%) had CHF RSRRs worse than the national average (+95% CI), whereas no hospital demonstrated worse-than-average risk-stratified readmission Rate (RSRR; +95% CI) for AMI or pneumonia. After increasing the number of facility admissions by combining three years of data, we found that four (range: 3.5%-5.3%) hospitals had RSRRs worse than the national average (+95% CI) for all three conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-derived 30-day readmission measure may not be a useful measure to distinguish VA interfacility performance or drive quality improvement given the low facility-level volume of such readmissions.

Racial/ethnic disparities among Asian Americans in inpatient acute myocardial infarction mortality in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common high-risk disease with inpatient mortality of 5% nationally. But little is known about this outcome among Asian Americans (Asians), a fast growing racial/ethnic minority in the country. The objectives of the study are to obtain near-national estimates of differences in AMI inpatient mortality between minorities (including Asians) and non-Hispanic Whites and identify comorbidities and sociodemographic characteristics associated with these differences. METHOD: This is a retrospective analysis of 2010-2011 state inpatient discharge data from 10 states with the largest share of Asian population. We identified hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of AMI using the ICD-9 code and used self-reported race/ethnicity to identify White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian. We performed descriptive analysis of sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, type of AMI, and receipt of cardiac procedures. Next, we examined overall inpatient AMI mortality rate based on patients' race/ethnicity. We also examined the types of AMI and a receipt of invasive cardiac procedures by race/ethnicity. Lastly, we used sequential multivariate logistic regression models to study inpatient mortality for each minority group compared to Whites, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Over 70% of the national Asian population resides in the 10 states. There were 496,472 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of AMI; 75% of all cases were Whites, 10% were Blacks, 12% were Hispanics, and 3% were Asians. Asians had a higher prevalence of cardiac comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, and kidney failure compared to Whites (p-value< 0.01). There were 158,623 STEMI (ST-elevation AMI), and the proportion of hospitalizations for STEMI was the highest for Asians (35.2% for Asians, 32.7% for Whites, 25.3% for Blacks, and 32.1% for Hispanics). Asians had the highest rates of inpatient AMI mortality: 7.2% for Asians, 6.3% for Whites, 5.4% for Blacks, and 5.9% for Hispanics (ANOVA p-value < 0.01). In adjusted analyses, Asians (OR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.04-1.19]) and Hispanics (OR = 1.14 [1.09-1.19]) had a higher likelihood of inpatient mortality compared to Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Asians had a higher risk-adjusted likelihood of inpatient AMI mortality compared to Whites. Further research is needed to identify the underlying reasons for this finding to improve AMI disparities for Asians.

A patient and family data domain collection framework for identifying disparities in pediatrics: results from the pediatric health equity collaborative.

BACKGROUND: By 2020, the child population is projected to have more racial and ethnic minorities make up the majority of the populations and health care organizations will need to have a system in place that collects accurate and reliable demographic data in order to monitor disparities. The goals of this group were to establish sample practices, approaches and lessons learned with regard to race, ethnicity, language, and other demographic data collection in pediatric care setting. METHODS: A panel of 16 research and clinical professional experts working in 10 pediatric care delivery systems in the US and Canada convened twice in person for 3-day consensus development meetings and met multiple times via conference calls over a two year period. Current evidence on adult demographic data collection was systematically reviewed and unique aspects of data collection in the pediatric setting were outlined. Human centered design methods were utilized to facilitate theme development, facilitate constructive and innovative discussion, and generate consensus. RESULTS: Group consensus determined six final data collection domains: 1) caregivers, 2) race and ethnicity, 3) language, 4) sexual orientation and gender identity, 5) disability, and 6) social determinants of health. For each domain, the group defined the domain, established a rational for collection, identified the unique challenges for data collection in a pediatric setting, and developed sample practices which are based on the experience of the members as a starting point to allow for customization unique to each health care organization. Several unique challenges in the pediatric setting across all domains include: data collection on caregivers, determining an age at which it is appropriate to collect data from the patient, collecting and updating data at multiple points across the lifespan, the limits of the electronic health record, and determining the purpose of the data collection before implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There is no single approach that will work for all organizations when collecting race, ethnicity, language and other social determinants of health data. Each organization will need to tailor their data collection based on the population they serve, the financial resources available, and the capacity of the electronic health record.

Disparities in Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations: Near-National Estimates for Hispanics.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain near-national rates of potentially preventable hospitalization (PPH)-a marker of barriers to outpatient care access-for Hispanics; to examine their differences from other race-ethnic groups and by Hispanic national origin; and to identify key mediating factors. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data from all-payer inpatient discharge databases for 15 states accounting for 85 percent of Hispanics nationally. STUDY DESIGN: Combining counts of inpatient discharges with census population for adults aged 18 and older, we estimated age-sex-adjusted PPH rates. We examined county-level variation in race-ethnic disparities in these rates to identify the mediating role of area-level indicators of chronic condition prevalence, socioeconomic status (SES), health care access, acculturation, and provider availability. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Age-sex-adjusted PPH rates were 13 percent higher among Hispanics (1,375 per 100,000 adults) and 111 percent higher among blacks (2,578) compared to whites (1,221). Among Hispanics, these rates were relatively higher in areas with predominantly Puerto Rican and Cuban Americans than in areas with Hispanics of other nationalities. Small area variation in chronic condition prevalence and SES fully accounted for the higher rates among Hispanics, but only partially among blacks. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanics and blacks face higher barriers to outpatient care access; the higher barriers among Hispanics (but not blacks) seem mediated by SES, lack of insurance, cost barriers, and limited provider availability.

Comparación entre perfil epidemiológico, clínico y costos hospitalarios de pacientes con manejo médico y quirúrgico por embarazo ectópico tubárico no roto, en el Hospital Nacional de la Mujer "Dra. María Isabel Rodríguez", junio 2012 ­ junio 2017 / Comparison between epidemiological and clinical profile and hospital costs of patients with medical and surgical management for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy, at the National Hospital for Women "Dra. María Isabel Rodríguez ", June 2012 - June 2017

El embarazo ectópico es la implantación de un óvulo fecundado fuera de la cavidad uterina, el cual tiene un abordaje quirúrgico y otro médico, que en ocasiones puede generar inseguridad o temor en los médicos tratantes optar por este último; pero ya existen criterios establecidos para este, los cuales incluye: tamaño de saco gestacional ectópico, concentración sérica de B-hCG y estabilidad hemodinámica; representando un menor costo hospitalario. El Metotrexato es un antagonista del ácido fólico que inhibe síntesis de Novo de purinas y pirimidinas, también interfiere con síntesis de ADN y proliferación celular

Comparación entre perfil epidemiológico, clínico y costos hospitalarios de pacientes con manejo médico y quirúrgico por embarazo ectópico tubárico no roto, en el Hospital Nacional de la Mujer "Dra. María Isabel Rodríguez", junio 2012 ­ junio 2017 / Comparison between epidemiological and clinical profile and hospital costs of patients with medical and surgical management for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy, at the National Hospital for Women "Dra. María Isabel Rodríguez ", June 2012 - June 2017

El embarazo ectópico es la implantación de un óvulo fecundado fuera de la cavidad uterina, el cual tiene un abordaje quirúrgico y otro médico, que en ocasiones puede generar inseguridad o temor en los médicos tratantes optar por este último; pero ya existen criterios establecidos para este, los cuales incluye: tamaño de saco gestacional ectópico, concentración sérica de B-hCG y estabilidad hemodinámica; representando un menor costo hospitalario. El Metotrexato es un antagonista del ácido fólico que inhibe síntesis de Novo de purinas y pirimidinas, también interfiere con síntesis de ADN y proliferación celular

Comparación entre perfil epidemiológico, clínico y costos hospitalarios de pacientes con manejo médico y quirúrgico por embarazo ectópico tubárico no roto, en el Hospital Nacional de la Mujer "Dra. María Isabel Rodríguez", junio 2012 ­ junio 2017 / Comparison between epidemiological and clinical profile and hospital costs of patients with medical and surgical management for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy, at the National Hospital for Women "Dra. María Isabel Rodríguez ", June 2012 - June 2017

El embarazo ectópico es la implantación de un óvulo fecundado fuera de la cavidad uterina, el cual tiene un abordaje quirúrgico y otro médico, que en ocasiones puede generar inseguridad o temor en los médicos tratantes optar por este último; pero ya existen criterios establecidos para este, los cuales incluye: tamaño de saco gestacional ectópico, concentración sérica de B-hCG y estabilidad hemodinámica; representando un menor costo hospitalario. El Metotrexato es un antagonista del ácido fólico que inhibe síntesis de Novo de purinas y pirimidinas, también interfiere con síntesis de ADN y proliferación celular

Organizational Change Management For Health Equity: Perspectives From The Disparities Leadership Program.

Leaders of health care organizations need to be prepared to improve quality and achieve equity in today's health care environment characterized by a focus on achieving value and addressing disparities in a diverse population. To help address this need, the Disparities Solutions Center at Massachusetts General Hospital launched the Disparities Leadership Program in 2007. The leadership program is an ongoing, year-long, executive education initiative that trains leaders from hospitals, health plans, and health centers to improve quality and eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Feedback from participating organizations demonstrates that health care leaders seem to possess knowledge about what disparities are and about what should be done to eliminate them. Data collection, performance measurement, and multifaceted interventions remain the tools of the trade. However, the barriers to success are lack of leadership buy-in, organizational prioritization, energy, and execution, which can be addressed through organizational change management strategies.

Association of Acculturation and Health Literacy with Prevalent Dysglycemia and Diabetes Control Among Latinos in the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey.

This study assessed the effect of acculturation on type 2 diabetes and whether health literacy may mediate this association. The Boston Area Community Health cohort is a multi-stage stratified random sample of adults from Boston including 744 Latinos. We defined dysglycemia as a HbA1c ≥5.7 %. Multivariable analyses examined the associations between acculturation and health literacy adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Similar analyses were performed among participants with HbA1c ≥7.0 % to assess the association between acculturation and diabetes control. Among an insured primarily foreign born Spanish speaking Latino population, with a long residence period in the US and good healthcare utilization, higher levels of acculturation were not associated with dysglycemia. Lower levels of acculturation were associated with worse diabetes control. Health literacy level did not modify these associations. Elucidating the components of heterogeneity among Latinos will be essential for understanding the influence of acculturation on diabetes.

Eliminating disparities among Latinos with type 2 diabetes: Effective eHealth strategies.

Latinos are at increased risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Well-designed information technology (IT) interventions have been shown to be generally efficacious in improving diabetes self-management. However, there are very few published IT intervention studies focused on Latinos. With the documented close of the digital divide, Latinos stand to benefit from such advances. There are limited studies on how best to address the unique socio-cultural-linguistic characteristics that would optimize adoption, use and benefit among Latinos. Successful e-health programs involve frequent communication, bidirectionality including feedback, and multimodal delivery of the intervention. The use of community health workers (CHWs) has been shown consistently to improve T2D outcomes in Latinos. Incorporating CHWs into eHealth interventions is likely to address barriers with technology literacy and improve patient activation, satisfaction and adherence. Additionally, tailored interventions are more successful in improving patient activation. It is important to note that tailoring is more than linguistic translation; tailoring interventions to the Latino population will need to address educational, language, literacy and acculturation levels, along with unique illness beliefs and attitudes about T2D found among Latinos. Interventions will need to go beyond the lone participant and include shared decision making models that incorporate family members and friends.

Improving transgender health by building safe clinical environments that promote existing resilience: Results from a qualitative analysis of providers.

BACKGROUND: Transgender (TG) individuals experience discordance between their sex at birth and their gender identity. To better understand the health care needs and characteristics of TG youth that contribute to resilience, we conducted a qualitative study with clinical and non-clinical providers. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted of providers (n = 11) of TG youth (ages 13-21). Convenience and purposive sampling were used to recruit participants in the Boston area. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. An interview guide of 14 open-ended questions was used to guide the discussion. A grounded theory approach was utilized to code and analyze the data, including double-coding to address issues of inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Five primary themes emerged: 1) resilience of TG youth 2) lack of access to services that influence health, 3) the critical role of social support, 4) challenges in navigating the health care system, and 5) the need for trans-affirming competency training for providers and frontline staff. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that providers recognize multiple barriers and challenges in the care of TG youth. However, they also identify the resilience exhibited by many youth. We propose that providers can further enhance the resilience of TG youth and help them flourish by offering them necessary resources via the creation of safe and welcoming clinical environments.

Young Hispanic Women Experience Higher In-Hospital Mortality Following an Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have declined for men and women, prior studies have reported a sex gap in mortality such that younger women were most likely to die after an AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We sought to explore the impact of race and ethnicity on the sex gap in AMI patterns of care and mortality for younger women in a contemporary patient cohort. We constructed multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models to examine trends in AMI hospitalizations, procedures, and in-hospital mortality by sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years), and race/ethnicity (white, black, and Hispanic). Analyses were derived from 194 071 patients who were hospitalized for an AMI with available race and ethnicity data from the 2009-2010 National Inpatient Sample. Hospitalization rates, procedures (coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary interventions, and cardiac bypass surgery), and inpatient mortality were analyzed across age, sex, and race/ethnic groups. There was significant variation in hospitalization rates by age and race/ethnicity. All racial/ethnic groups were less likely to undergo invasive procedures compared with white men (P<0.001). After adjustment for comorbidities, younger Hispanic women experienced higher in-hospital mortality compared with younger white men, with an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.9), adjusted for age and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: We found significant racial and sex disparities in AMI hospitalizations, care patterns, and mortality, with higher in-hospital mortality experienced by younger Hispanic women. Future studies are necessary to explore determinants of these significant racial and sex disparities in outcomes for AMI.

Improved quality of care for cardiovascular disease for Latinos seen in high proportion Latino vs low proportion Latino clinics.

BACKGROUND: Primary care practices that concentrate linguistically and culturally appropriate services for Latinos may result in higher cardiology consultation rates and improved process measure performance for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to assess differences in referral at high proportion (HP) vs low proportion (LP) practices. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to assess the frequency of follow-up consultation. RESULTS: Among the 9,761 patients, 9,168 had CAD, 4,444 had CHF, and 3,851 had both conditions. Latinos comprised 11% of the CAD cohort and 11% of the CHF cohort. Multivariable analyses showed higher consultation rates for Latinos at HP practices for CAD and CHF. Blacks and Whites at HP practices had no significant differences in rates of consultation compared to those in LP practices. Latinos at HP practices had 25% more consultations for CAD and 23% more consultations for CHF than Latinos at LP practices. Latinos at HP clinics had higher overall mean quality performance on clinical measures for both CAD and CHF. Latinos at an LP clinic had the largest improvement in quality performance with consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Among Latinos with CAD or CHF receiving care within a single large academic care network, Latino patients at HP practices have higher rates of cardiologist consultation and performance on CVD process measures compared to Latino patients at LP practices. Elucidating the essential components of individual practice environments that provide higher quality of care for Latinos will allow for well designed systems to reduce health care disparities.

Use of interpreters by physicians for hospitalized limited English proficient patients and its impact on patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the impact of inpatient interpreter use for limited English proficient (LEP) patients on length of stay (LOS), 30-day post discharge emergency department (ED) visits and 30-day hospital readmission rates for LEP patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of all hospitalized patients admitted to the general medicine service at a large academic center. For patients self-reported as LEP, use of interpreters during each episode of hospitalization was categorized as: 1) interpreter used by non-MD (i.e., nurse); 2) interpreter used by a non-Hospitalist MD; 3) interpreter used by Hospitalist; and 4) no interpreter used during hospitalization. We examined the association of English proficiency and interpreter use on outcomes utilizing Poisson and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 4,224 patients, 564 (13 %) were LEP. Of these LEP patients, 65.8 % never had a documented interpreter visit, 16.8 % utilized an interpreter with a non-MD, 12.6 % utilized an interpreter with a non-Hospitalist MD and 4.8 % utilized an interpreter with a hospitalist present. In adjusted models, compared to English speakers, LEP patients with no interpreters had significantly shorter LOS. There were no differences in readmission rates and ED utilization between LEP and English-speaking patients. Compared to LEP patients with no interpreter use, those who had a physician use an interpreter had odds for a longer LOS, but there was no difference in odds of readmission or ED utilization. CONCLUSION: Academic hospital clinician use of interpreters remains highly variable and physicians may selectively be using interpreters for the sickest patients.