A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation.

BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate the conductive pressure (Pcond) method, which compare the Pcond-defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP-to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method. METHODS: The proof-of-concept of the Pcond method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the Pcond method was compared with the standard low-flow method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bench assessments validated the Pcond method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the Pcond method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by Pcond and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Changes in SpO2 were significantly lower during Pcond than during standard method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Determination of Pcond during constant-flow assist control ventilation may permit to easily and safely detect and measure AOP.

Bench Assessment of Expiratory Valve Resistance of Current ICU Ventilators in Dynamic Conditions.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the lack of benefit of setting a low versus a high PEEP in patients with ARDS may be due in part to differences in the dynamic behavior of the expiratory valve in ventilators. We tested this hypothesis by conducting a bench comparison of the dynamic behavior of expiratory valves on ICU ventilators currently in use. METHODS: We attached 7 ICU ventilators (C5, C6, Carescape, PB980, ServoU, V500, and V680) to the ASL 5000 lung model (passive condition with compliance 20 mL/cm H2O and resistance 5 cm H2O/L/s) and set in volume controlled mode (tidal volume 0.8 L, breathing frequency 10 breaths/min). Flow and pressure were measured just before the exhalation valve. At PEEP of 5, 10, and 15 cm H2O, the median instantaneous expiratory resistance, the time to valve opening, and the pressure time products above or below the values of PEEP (expressed in cm H2O × s) were determined. RESULTS: Median instantaneous expiratory resistance values differed between the ventilators and PEEP settings with a significant interaction: at PEEP 5 cm H2O, the median (interquartile range) expiratory resistance values were 3.9 (3.5-4.7), 3.0 (3.0-3.1), 20.9 (15.8-24.9), 27.4 (26.5-43.2), 13.8 (13.6-13.9), 4.4 (4.0-4.6), and 34.3 (33.7-33.8) cm H2O/L/s, for the C5, C6, Carescape, PB980, ServoU, V500, and V680, respectively. For all the PEEP settings, the corresponding times to valve opening were 0.080 (0.077-0.082), 0.082 (0.080-0.085), 0.110 (0.105-0.110), 0.100 (0.085-1.05), 0.072 (0.062-0.072), 0.145 (0.115-0.150), and 0.075 (0.070-0.080) s, respectively, and pressure-time products were 2.8 (2.1-7.4), 6.8 (6.7-7.3), 2.4 (2.1-2.4), 3.5 (2.7-3.6), 1.8 (1.8-2.1), 2.8 (2.7-2.9), and 5.7 (5.4-5.9) cm H2O × s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The resistance of active expiratory valves differed significantly between the 7 ICU ventilators tested.

A Comprehensive Bench Assessment of Automatic Tube Compensation in ICU Ventilators for Better Clinical Management.

BACKGROUND: Automatic tube compensation (ATC) unloads endotracheal tube (ETT) resistance. We conducted a bench assessment of ATC functionality in ICU ventilators to improve clinical management. METHODS: This study had 2 phases. First, we performed an international survey on the use of ATC in clinical practice, hypothesizing a rate of ATC use of 25%. Second, we tested 7 modern ICU ventilators in a lung model mimicking a normal subject (Normal), a subject with ARDS, and a subject with COPD. Inspiratory effort consisted of esophageal pressure over 30 consecutive breaths obtained in a real patient under weaning. A brand new 8-mm inner diameter ETT was attached to the lung model, and ATC was set at 100% compensation for the ETT. The 30 breaths were first run with ATC off and no ETT (ie, reference period), and then with ATC on and ETT (ie, active period). The primary end point was the difference in tidal volume (VT) between reference and active periods. We hypothesized that the VT difference should be equal to 0 in an ideally functioning ATC. VT difference was compared across ventilators and respiratory mechanics conditions using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: The clinical use of ATC was 64% according to 644 individuals who responded to the international survey. The VT difference varied significantly across ventilators in all respiratory mechanics configurations. The divergence between VT difference and 0 was small but significant: the extreme median (interquartile range) values were -0.013 L (-0.019 to -0.002) in the COPD model and 0.056 L (0.051-0.06) in the Normal model. VT difference for all ventilators was 0.015 L (95% CI 0.013-0.018) in the ARDS model, which was significantly different from 0.021 L (95% CI 0.018-0.024) in the Normal model (P < .001) and 0.010 L (0.007-0.012) in the COPD model (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: ATC is used more frequently in clinical practice than expected. In addition, VT delivery by ATC differed slightly though significantly between ventilators.

Bench Assessment of the Effect of a Collapsible Tube on the Efficiency of a Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Device.

BACKGROUND: Collapsibility of upper airways may impair the efficacy of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) devices. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a collapsible tube on peak expiratory flow (PEF) when using an MI-E device. METHODS: An MI-E device was attached to a lung simulator. Resistance was set at 5 and 20 cm H2O/L/s (R5, R20) for compliance settings of 20, 40, and 60 mL/cm H2O (C20, C40, C60). A series of 5 cycles were delivered at 3 pressures in the following order: +30/-30, +40/-40, and +50/-50 cm H2O for each compliance/resistance combination with and without the collapsible tube. Each respiratory mechanics profile was tested in random order. Pressure and flow were measured upstream of the MI-E device, and the primary outcome measure was PEF. The relationships of PEF to maximum expiratory pressure were compared with and without the collapsible tube using a linear regression model. RESULTS: For the C20-R5 condition, the effect of the collapsible tube on the intercept (-0.35 cm H2O) was not significant, but this was offset by a significant (and the largest) increase in slope (+0.12 L/s/cm H2O). For the C60-R20 condition, the effect of the collapsible tube on the slope (-0.003 L/s/cm H2O) was not significant, but this was offset by a significant (and the largest) increase of the intercept (+3.16 cm H2O) at 30 cm H2O expiratory pressure. For the other conditions, the collapsible tube significantly increased PEF at 30 cm H2O expiratory pressure, and the gap further increased above this pressure as the slope increased with the collapsible tube. CONCLUSIONS: The collapsible tube resulted in a higher PEF for all respiratory mechanics profiles tested.

The acoustic reflection method for the assessment of paediatric upper airways.

The acoustic reflection method (ARM) is based on the analysis of the reflection of an acoustic wave in the airway, allowing the calculation of its longitudinal cross-sectional area profile and airway resistance. The ARM represents a simple, quick and totally non invasive tool for the investigation of the upper airways, requiring minimal cooperation, which makes this technique particularly suitable for children. Normal values of the minimal cross sectional area of the upper airways in children have been recently published. The ARM has shown its utility in the investigation of the nasal cavity in healthy and diseased children and of the upper airways in children with various diseases such as mucopolysaccharidosis and cystic fibrosis. This simple, rapid, and inexpensive technique seems promising for the non-invasive investigation of the whole upper airway during wakefulness in children, both in health and disease, and may constitute a complementary or alternative method to explore and follow children with anomalies of the upper airways.

Cross-sectional assessment of the roles of comorbidities in resting and activity-related dyspnea in severely obese women.

OBJECTIVES: Obesity has been associated with a lesser degree of asthma control that may be biased by other comorbidities. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to describe resting and activity-related dyspnea complaints according to the presence of obesity-related comorbidities (asymptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB)). We hypothesized that obese women can exhibit both resting and activity-related dyspnea, independently of the presence of asthma. METHODS: Severely obese (body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg m(-2)) women prospectively underwent description of resting and activity-related dyspnea (verbal descriptors and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale), pulmonary function testing (spirometry, absolute lung volumes, and methacholine challenge test), oesogastro-duodenal fibroscopy, and overnight polygraphy. Thirty healthy lean women without airway hyperresponsiveness were enrolled. RESULTS: Resting dyspnea complaints were significantly more prevalent in obesity (prevalence 41%) than in healthy lean women (prevalence 3%). Chest tightness and the need for deep inspirations were independently associated with both asthma and GERD while wheezing and cough were related to asthma only in obese women. Activity-related dyspnea was very prevalent (MRC score > 1, 75%), associated with obesity, with the exception of wheezing on exertion due to asthma. Asymptomatic AHR and SDB did not affect dyspneic complaints. CONCLUSIONS: In severely obese women referred for bariatric surgery, resting dyspnea complaints are observed in association with asthma or GERD, while activity-related dyspnea was mainly related to obesity only. Consequently, asthma does not explain all respiratory complaints of obese women.