Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 63(3): 313-323, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35987557

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medication adherence is important for optimal management of chronic conditions, including hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. This study describes adherence to antihypertensive and statin medications, individually and collectively, and examines variation in adherence by demographic and geographic characteristics. METHODS: The 2017 prescription drug event data for beneficiaries with Medicare Part D coverage were assessed. Beneficiaries with a proportion of days covered ≥80% were considered adherent. Adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated to quantify the associations between demographic and geographic characteristics and adherence. Adherence estimates were mapped by county of residence using a spatial empirical Bayesian smoothing technique to enhance stability. Analyses were conducted in 2019‒2021. RESULTS: Among the 22.5 million beneficiaries prescribed antihypertensive medications, 77.1% were adherent; among the 16.1 million prescribed statin medications, 81.9% were adherent; and among the 13.5 million prescribed antihypertensive and statin medications, 70.3% were adherent to both. Adherence varied by race/ethnicity: American Indian/Alaska Native (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.83, 95% confidence limit=0.82, 0.842), Hispanic (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.90, 95% confidence limit=0.90, 0.91), and non-Hispanic Black (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.87, 95% confidence limit=0.86, 0.87) beneficiaries were less likely to be adherent than non-Hispanic White beneficiaries. County-level adherence ranged across the U.S. from 25.7% to 88.5% for antihypertensive medications, from 36.0% to 93.8% for statin medications, and from 20.8% to 92.9% for both medications combined and tended to be the lowest in the southern U.S. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights opportunities for efforts to remove barriers and support medication adherence, especially among racial/ethnic minority groups and within the regions at greatest risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Medicare Part D , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Teorema de Bayes , Etnicidade , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Grupos Minoritários , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 62(6): e351-e355, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597571

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death. However, effective medicines, including prescription medications often covered by health insurance, are available to aid cessation. METHODS: Trends of 7 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved prescription medications for smoking cessation during 2009-2019 (before and during Affordable Care Act implementation), including fill counts and spending (total and patient, adjusted to 2019 U.S. dollars), were assessed among U.S. adults aged ≥18 years. Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse combines data on >90% of outpatient prescription fills with market purchasing data to create national estimates. Analyses were conducted in 2021. RESULTS: Annually, total fills (spending) decreased from 3.7 million ($577 million) in 2009 to 2.5 million ($465 million) in 2013 and increased to 4.5 million ($1.279 billion) in 2019; patient spending decreased from $174 million (30% of total annual spending) in 2009 to $54 million (4%) in 2019. Comparing 2009 with 2019, the total spending per fill increased by 80% (from $157 to $282), whereas patient spending per fill decreased by 75% (from $47 to $12). The total spending per fill for branded products increased by 175% (from $166 to $459) and decreased by 41% (from $75 to $44) for generic products. Branded product percentage decreased from 89% to 57%. CONCLUSIONS: Total fills and spending decreased from 2009 to 2013 and then increased through 2019, whereas patient spending decreased. Earlier studies suggest possible reasons for these trends, such as gradual implementation of federal requirements for insurance coverage of cessation medications and reduced cost sharing and financial barriers.


Assuntos
Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Adulto , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Prescrições , Fumar , Estados Unidos
4.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 17: E112, 2020 09 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975508

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medication adherence can improve hypertension management. How blood pressure medications are prescribed and purchased can promote or impede adherence. METHODS: We used comprehensive dispensing data on prescription blood pressure medication from Symphony Health's 2017 Integrated Dataverse to assess how prescription- and payment-related factors that promote medication adherence (ie, fixed-dose combinations, generic formulations, mail order, low-cost or no-copay medications) vary across US states and census regions and across the market segments (grouped by patient age, prescriber type, and payer type) responsible for the greatest number of blood pressure medication fills. RESULTS: In 2017, 706.5 million prescriptions for blood pressure medication were filled, accounting for $29.0 billion in total spending (17.0% incurred by patients). As a proportion of all fills, factors that promoted adherence varied by state: fixed-dose combinations (from 5.8% in Maine to 17.9% in Mississippi); generic formulations (from 95.2% in New Jersey to 98.4% in Minnesota); mail order (from 4.7% in Rhode Island to 14.5% in Delaware); and lower or no copayment (from 56.6% in Utah to 72.8% in California). Furthermore, mean days' supply per fill (from 43.1 in Arkansas to 63.8 in Maine) and patient spending per therapy year (from $38 in Hawaii to $76 in Georgia) varied. Concentration of adherence factors differed by market segment. Patients aged 18 to 64 with a primary care physician prescriber and Medicaid coverage had the lowest concentration of fixed-dose combination fills, mean days' supply per fill, and patient spending per therapy year. Patients aged 65 years or older with a primary care physician prescriber and commercial insurance had the highest concentration of fixed-dose combinations fills and mail order fills. CONCLUSION: Addressing regional and market segment variation in factors promoting blood pressure medication adherence may increase adherence and improve hypertension management.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/economia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Pressão Sanguínea , Combinação de Medicamentos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid/economia , Prescrições , Estados Unidos
5.
Am J Hypertens ; 33(9): 879-886, 2020 09 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32369108

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is an important element of uncontrolled hypertension. Financial factors frequently contribute to nonadherence. The objective of this study was to examine the association between cost-related medication nonadherence (CRMN) and self-reported antihypertensive medication use and self-reported normal blood pressure among US adults with self-reported hypertension. METHODS: Participants with self-reported hypertension from the 2017 National Health Interview Survey were included (n = 7,498). CRMN was defined using standard questions. Hypertension management included: (i) self-reported current antihypertensive medication use and (ii) self-reported normal blood pressure within the past 12 months. Adjusted prevalence and prevalence ratios of hypertension management indicators among those with and without CRMN were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 10.7% reported CRMN, 83.6% reported current antihypertensive medication use, and 67.4% reported normal blood pressure within past 12 months. Adjusted percentages of current antihypertensive medication use (88.6% vs. 82.9%, P < 0.001) and self-reported normal blood pressure (69.8% vs. 59.5%, P = 0.002) were higher among those without CRMN compared with those with CRMN. Adjusted prevalence ratios showed that, compared with those with CRMN, those without CRMN were more likely to report current antihypertensive medication use (odds ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.12) and self-reported normal blood pressure (1.15 (1.07-1.23)). CONCLUSIONS: Among US adults with self-reported hypertension, those without CRMN were more likely to report current antihypertensive medication use and normal blood pressure within the past 12 months. Financial barriers to medication adherence persist and impact hypertension management.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Gastos em Saúde , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Proteínas de Escherichia coli , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Renda , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Hypertension ; 74(6): 1324-1332, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679429

RESUMO

Despite the importance of antihypertensive medication therapy for blood pressure control, no single data system provides estimates of medication nonadherence rates across age groups and health insurance plans types. Using multiple administrative datasets and national survey data, we determined health insurance plan-specific and overall weighted national rates of nonadherence to antihypertensive medications among insured hypertensive US adults in 2015. We used 2015 prescription claims data from Medicare Part D and 3 IBM MarketScan databases (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Supplemental) to calculate medication nonadherence rates among hypertensive adults aged ≥18 years with public or private health insurance using the proportion of days covered algorithm. These findings, in combination with National Health Interview Survey findings, were used to project national weighted estimates of nonadherence. We included 23.8 million hypertensive adults who filled 265.8 million prescriptions for antihypertensive medications. Nonadherence differed by health insurance plan type (highest for Medicaid members, 55.4%; lowest for Medicare Part D members, 25.2%). The overall weighted national nonadherence rate was 31.0%, with greater nonadherence among women versus men, younger versus older adults (aged 18-34 years, 58.1%; aged 65-74 years, 24.4%), fixed-dose combination medication nonusers (31.2%) versus users (29.4%), and by pharmacy outlet type (retail only, 30.7%; any mail order, 19.8%). In 2015, almost one-third (≈16.3 million) of insured US adults with diagnosed hypertension were considered nonadherent to their antihypertensive medication regimen, and considerable disparities were evident. Public health and healthcare professionals can use available evidence-based interventions to address nonadherence and improve blood pressure control.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Incidência , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part D , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
7.
Med Care ; 57(11): 882-889, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567863

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the potential health and budgetary impacts of implementing a pharmacist-involved team-based hypertension management model in the United States. RESEARCH DESIGN: In 2017, we evaluated a pharmacist-involved team-based care intervention among 3 targeted groups using a microsimulation model designed to estimate cardiovascular event incidence and associated health care spending in a cross-section of individuals representative of the US population: implementing it among patients with: (1) newly diagnosed hypertension; (2) persistently (≥1 year) uncontrolled blood pressure (BP); or (3) treated, yet persistently uncontrolled BP-and report outcomes over 5 and 20 years. We describe the spending thresholds for each intervention strategy to achieve budget neutrality in 5 years from a payer's perspective. RESULTS: Offering this intervention could prevent 22.9-36.8 million person-years of uncontrolled BP and 77,200-230,900 heart attacks and strokes in 5 years (83.8-174.8 million and 393,200-922,900 in 20 years, respectively). Health and economic benefits strongly favored groups 2 and 3. Assuming an intervention cost of $525 per enrollee, the intervention generates 5-year budgetary cost-savings only for Medicare among groups 2 and 3. To achieve budget neutrality in 5 years across all groups, intervention costs per person need to be around $35 for Medicaid, $180 for private insurance, and $335 for Medicare enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a pharmacist-involved team-based hypertension model could substantially improve BP control and cardiovascular outcomes in the United States. Net cost-savings among groups 2 and 3 make a compelling case for Medicare, but favorable economics may also be possible for private insurers, particularly if innovations could moderately lower the cost of delivering an effective intervention.


Assuntos
Orçamentos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Simulação por Computador , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/economia , Estados Unidos
8.
Am J Health Promot ; 33(2): 208-216, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29962209

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends that adults at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) be offered or referred to intensive behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for CVD prevention. We assessed primary care providers' (PCPs) awareness of local physical activity-related behavioral counseling services, whether this awareness was associated with referring eligible patients, and the types and locations of services to which they referred. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Primary care providers practicing in the United States. SUBJECTS: 1256 respondents. MEASURES: DocStyles 2016 survey assessing PCPs' awareness of and referral to physical activity-related behavioral counseling services. ANALYSIS: Calculated prevalence and adjusted odds ratios (aORs). RESULTS: Overall, 49.9% of PCPs were aware of local services. Only 12.6% referred many or most of their at-risk patients and referral was associated with awareness of local services (aOR = 2.81, [95% confidence interval: 1.85-4.25]). Among those referring patients, services ranged from a health-care worker within their practice or group (25.4%) to an organized program in a medical facility (41.2%). Primary care providers most often referred to services located outside their practice or group (58.1%). CONCLUSION: About half of PCPs were aware of local behavioral counseling services, and referral was associated with awareness. Establishing local resources and improving PCPs' awareness of them, especially using community-clinical linkages, may help promote physical activity among adults at risk for CVD.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Aconselhamento/organização & administração , Exercício Físico , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Conscientização , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Grupos Raciais , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Características de Residência , Fatores Sexuais
9.
Circ Heart Fail ; 11(12): e004873, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30562099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF)-a serious and costly condition-is increasingly prevalent. We estimated the US burden including emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalizations and associated costs, and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 2006 to 2014 data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National (nationwide) Inpatient Sample, and the National Vital Statistics System. International Classification of Disease codes identified HF and comorbidities. Burden was estimated separately for ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality. In addition, criteria were applied to identify total unique acute events. Rates of primary HF (primary diagnosis or underlying cause of death) and comorbid HF (comorbid diagnosis or contributing cause of death) were calculated, age standardized to the 2010 US population. In 2014, there were an estimated 1 068 412 ED visits, 978 135 hospitalizations, and 83 705 deaths with primary HF. There were 4 071 546 ED visits, 3 370 856 hospitalizations, and 230 963 deaths with comorbid HF. Between 2006 and 2014, the total unique acute event rate for primary HF declined from 536 to 449 per 100 000 (relative percent change of -16%; P for trend, <0.001) but increased for comorbid HF from 1467 to 1689 per 100 000 (relative percentage change, 15%; P for trend, <0.001). HF-related mortality decreased significantly from 2006 to 2009 but did not change meaningfully after 2009. For hospitalizations with primary HF, the estimated mean cost was $11 552 in 2014, totaling an estimated $11 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Given substantial healthcare and mortality burden of HF, rising healthcare costs, and the aging US population, continued improvements in HF prevention, management, and surveillance are important.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(20): 575-578, 2018 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29795076

RESUMO

Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability in the United States (1,2). Approximately 800,000 American adults experience a stroke each year (2,3). Currently, approximately 6 million stroke survivors live in the United States (2). Participation in stroke rehabilitation (rehab), which occurs in diverse settings (i.e., in-hospital, postacute care, and outpatient settings), has been determined to reduce stroke recurrence and improve functional outcomes and quality of life (3,4). Despite longstanding national guidelines recommending stroke rehab, it remains underutilized, especially in the outpatient setting. Professional associations and evidence-based guidelines support the increasing stroke rehab use in health systems and are promoted by the public health community (3-6). An analysis of 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data revealed that 30.7% of stroke survivors reported participation in outpatient rehab for stroke after hospital discharge in 21 states and the District of Columbia (DC) (7). To update these estimates, 2013 and 2015 BRFSS data were analyzed to assess outpatient rehab use among adult stroke survivors. Overall, outpatient rehab use was 31.2% (20 states and DC) in 2013 and 35.5% (four states) in 2015. Disparities were evident by sex, race, Hispanic origin, and level of education. Focused attention on system-level interventions that ensure participation is needed, especially among disparate populations with lower levels of participation.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , District of Columbia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Am J Prev Med ; 53(6S2): S213-S219, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29153123

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act provision implemented policies to improve coverage for young adults. It is not known if it affected access to care among young adults with hypertension. METHODS: National Health Interview Survey data from 2006 to 2009 and 2011 to 2014 were used. Young adults aged 19-25 years were assessed for potential barriers to access to health care. The authors compared the percentage of each indicator of barriers to access to health care among young adults in general, as well as those with hypertension in the two time periods and estimated the AOR. All data were self-reported. The analyses were conducted in 2016. RESULTS: Among young adults, the frequencies of barrier indicators were significantly lower in 2011-2014 than 2006-2009, except "did not see doctor in the past 12 months." Among those with hypertension, the percentage reporting "no health insurance" (31.3% vs 23.3%, p=0.037); "no place to see a doctor when needed" (30.5% vs 21.6%, p=0.031); or "cannot afford prescribed medicine" (23.0% vs 15.3%, p=0.023) were significantly lower in 2011-2014 compared with that of 2006-2009. The differences maintained statistical significance after adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, and level of education. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in select access to care measures were found among young adults with hypertension between 2006-2009 and 2011-2014, as was found among young adults generally. Changes in extension of dependent insurance coverage in 2010 may have led to improvements in access to care among this group.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/terapia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Adulto , Escolaridade , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/tendências , Humanos , Hipertensão/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Masculino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(6)2017 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28647688

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antihypertension medication (antihypertensive) adherence lowers risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD); few studies have examined this association among older adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed this association among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 to 79 years who were newly diagnosed with hypertension and initiated on antihypertensives in 2008-2009 (n=155 597). We calculated proportion of days covered (PDC) during follow-up, using proportional subdistribution hazard models, to examine association between antihypertensive adherence and a composite CVD outcomes, including first incident of fatal/nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and heart failure. During follow-up (median 5.8 years and 798 621 person-years), we documented 47 198 CVD events. Among beneficiaries, 60.8%, 30.3%, and 8.9% had PDC ≥80%, 40% to 79%, and <40%. Crude incidence of CVD events were 40.1 (95% CI, 40.0-40.1), 93.9 (93.8-93.9), and 98.1 (98.1-98.2) per 1000 person-years for PDC ≥80%, 40% to 79%, and <40%, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for CVD events were 1.0 (<40% as reference), 1.0 (0.97-1.03) for 40% to 79%, and 0.44 (0.42-0.45) for ≥80% (P<0.001). Dose-response analysis suggested a nonlinear relationship between PDC and risk for CVD events with a protective effect of ≥80%. The pattern of associations between PDC and ischemic heart disease, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and heart failure were largely consistent as for CVD events and across different groups. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive adherence was associated with a significantly lower risk of CVD events among older adults. There appeared to be a threshold effect in reducing CVD events at around PDC 80%, above which the risk for CVD reduced substantially.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Medicare , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Dinâmica não Linear , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Proteção , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 19(6): 584-591, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28371252

RESUMO

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) among hypertensive adults was assessed using the 2012 American Heart Association Cardiovascular Health Consumer Survey. The prevalence of hypertension was 25.5% and 53.8% of those reported HBPM. Approximately 63% of hypertensive adults 65 years and older reported HBPM followed by 51% and 34.6% (35-64 and 18-34 years, respectively; P=.001). Those who had seen a healthcare professional within a year reported HBPM compared with those who had not (54.8% vs 32.8%, P=.047). Those who believed that lowering blood pressure can reduce risk of heart attack and stroke had a higher percentage of HBPM compared with those who did not (55.5% vs 33.1%, P=.01). Age and the belief that lowering blood pressure could reduce cardiovascular disease risk were significant factors associated with HBPM. Half of the adult hypertensive patients reported HBPM and its use was greater among those who reported a positive attitude toward lowering blood pressure to reduce cardiovascular disease risk.


Assuntos
American Heart Association/organização & administração , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Cultura , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Prevalência , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 5(12)2016 12 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28003253

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke. Health insurance coverage affects hypertension treatment and control, but limited information is available for US adults with hypertension who are classified as underinsured. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2013 data, we identified adults with self-reported hypertension. On the basis of self-reported health insurance status and health care-related financial burdens, participants were categorized as uninsured, underinsured, or adequately insured. Proxies for health care received included whether they reported taking antihypertensive medications and whether they visited a doctor for a routine checkup in the past year. We assessed the association between health insurance status and health care received, adjusting for selected sociodemographic characteristics. Among 123 257 participants from 38 states and District of Columbia with self-reported hypertension, 12% were uninsured, 26% were underinsured, and 62% were adequately insured. In adjusted models using adequately insured participants as referent, both uninsured (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.35-0.43) and underinsured (0.83, 0.76-0.89) participants were less likely to report using antihypertensive medication than those of adequately insured participants. Similarly, adjusted odds ratio of visiting a doctor for routine checkup in the past year were 0.25 (0.23-0.28) for those who were uninsured and 0.78 (0.72-0.84) for those who were underinsured compared to those with adequate insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured and underinsured participants with hypertension were less likely to report receiving care compared to those with adequate insurance coverage. Disparities in health care coverage may necessitate targeted interventions, even among people with health insurance.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Hipertensão/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(36): 967-76, 2016 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27632693

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Nonadherence to taking prescribed antihypertensive medication (antihypertensive) regimens has been identified as a leading cause of poor blood pressure control among persons with hypertension and an important risk factor for adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes. CDC and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services analyzed geographic, racial-ethnic, and other disparities in nonadherence to antihypertensives among Medicare Part D beneficiaries in 2014. METHODS: Antihypertensive nonadherence, defined as a proportion of days a beneficiary was covered with antihypertensives of <80%, was assessed using prescription drug claims data among Medicare Advantage or Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with Medicare Part D coverage during 2014 (N = 18.5 million). Analyses were stratified by antihypertensive class, beneficiaries' state and county of residence, type of prescription drug plan, and treatment and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 26.3% (4.9 million) of Medicare Part D beneficiaries using antihypertensives were nonadherent to their regimen. Nonadherence differed by multiple factors, including medication class (range: 16.9% for angiotensin II receptor blockers to 28.9% for diuretics); race-ethnicity (24.3% for non-Hispanic whites, 26.3% for Asian/Pacific Islanders, 33.8% for Hispanics, 35.7% for blacks, and 38.8% for American Indians/Alaska Natives); and state of residence (range 18.7% for North Dakota to 33.7% for the District of Columbia). Considerable county-level variation in nonadherence was found; the highest nonadherence tended to occur in the southern United States (U.S. Census region nonadherence = 28.9% [South], 26.7% [West], 24.1% [Northeast], and 22.8% [Midwest]) CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: More than one in four Medicare Part D beneficiaries using antihypertensives were nonadherent to their regimen, and certain racial/ethnic groups, states, and geographic areas were at increased risk for nonadherence. These findings can help inform focused interventions among these groups, which might improve blood pressure control and cardiovascular disease outcomes.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Hipertensão/etnologia , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
17.
PLoS One ; 11(7): e0159366, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effective hypertension management often necessitates patients' adherence to the blood pressure (BP)-lowering medication regimen they are prescribed. Patients' adherence to that regimen can be affected by prescription- and payment-related factors that are typically controlled by prescribers, filling pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers, and/or patients' health insurance plans. This study describes patterns and changes from 2009 to 2014 in factors that the literature reports are associated with increased adherence to BP-lowering medication. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We use a robust source of United States prescription sales data-IMS Health's National Prescription Audit-to describe BP-lowering medication fill counts and spending in 2009 compared with 2014. Moreover, we describe patterns and changes in adherence-promoting factors across age groups, payment sources, and medication classes. From 2009 to 2014, the BP-lowering medication prescription fill count increased from 613.7 million to 653.0 million. Encouraging changes in adherence-promoting factors included: the share of generic fills increased from 82.5% to 95.0%; average days' supply per fill increased from 45.9 to 51.8 days; and average total (patient contribution) spending per years' supply decreased from $359 ($54) to $311 ($37). Possibly undesirable changes included: the percentage of fills for fixed-dose combinations decreased from 17.1% to 14.2% and acquired via mail order decreased from 10.7% to 8.2%. In 2014: 653.0 million fills occurred accounting for $28.81B in spending; adults aged 45-64 years had the highest percentage of fixed-dose combinations fills (16.9%); and fills with Medicaid as the payment source had the lowest average patient spending per fill ($1.19). CONCLUSIONS: We identified both encouraging and possibly undesirable patterns and changes from 2009 to 2014 in factors that promote adherence to BP-lowering medications during this period. Continued tracking of these metrics using pharmacy sales data can help identify areas that can be addressed by clinical and policy interventions to improve adherence for medications commonly used to treat hypertension.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/provisão & distribuição , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos Genéricos/provisão & distribuição , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão/psicologia , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
18.
Med Care ; 54(5): 504-11, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27078823

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the impact of antihypertensive medication (AHM) adherence on the incidence and associated Medicaid costs of acute cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS: The study cohort (n=59,037) consists of nonelderly adults continuously enrolled (36 mo and above) in a Medicaid fee-for-service program. AHM adherence was calculated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and stratified to low (MPR<60%), moderate (60%≤MPR<80%), and high (MPR≥80%) levels. We used a proportional hazard model to estimate risk for acute CVD events and generalized linear models to estimate Medicaid per-patient-per-year costs. RESULTS: Low and moderate adherence subgroups had about 1.8 and 1.4 times higher risk of acute CVD events, compared with high adherence subgroup. By adherence level, Medicaid per-patient per-year costs for (1) CVD-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations were $661 (low), $479 (moderate), and $343 (high) and (2) AHMs were $430 (low), $604 (moderate), and $664 (high). Costs for CVD events and AHMs combined were similar across adherence subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Lower adherence to AHM was associated with progressively higher CVD risk. The increase in medication cost from higher AHM adherence was offset solely by reduced Medicaid spending on acute CVD events.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Am Soc Hypertens ; 10(3): 252-262.e3, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26851000

RESUMO

Achieving and maintaining a healthy lifestyle is an important part of hypertension management. The purpose of this study was to assess US state-level prevalence of adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviors among those with self-reported hypertension. Using 2013 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based telephone survey, we examined the adherence to five healthy lifestyle behaviors related to hypertension management: having a "normal" weight, not smoking, avoiding or limiting alcohol intake, consuming the recommended amount of fruits and vegetables, and engaging in the recommended amount of physical activity. We estimated age-standardized percentages of each healthy lifestyle behavior overall and by state, as well as prevalence of all five healthy lifestyle behaviors. Overall, the prevalence of healthy lifestyle behaviors varied widely among those with self-reported hypertension: 20.5% had a normal weight, 82.3% did not smoke, 94.1% reported no or limited alcohol intake, 14.1% consumed the recommended amounts of fruits or vegetables, and 46.6% engaged in the recommended amount of physical activity. Overall, only 1.7% of adults with self-reported hypertension reported all five healthy lifestyle behaviors, with significant variation by state. Age-standardized prevalence of individuals reporting all five healthy lifestyle behaviors ranged from 0.3% in Louisiana to 3.8% in the District of Columbia. In conclusion, adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviors varied among those with hypertension; fewer than 2% reported meeting current recommendations and standards when assessed collectively. Disparities were observed by demographic and descriptive characteristics, including geography.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Estilo de Vida Saudável , Hipertensão/terapia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
20.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(47): 1305-11, 2015 Dec 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26633047

RESUMO

A high blood level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), although data from 2005 through 2012 has shown a decline in high cholesterol (total and LDL cholesterol) along with an increase in the use of cholesterol-lowering medications. The most recent national guidelines (published in 2013) from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) expand previous recommendations for reducing cholesterol to include lifestyle modifications and medication use as part of complete cholesterol management and to lower risk for ASCVD. Because changes in cholesterol treatment guidelines might magnify existing disparities in care and medication use, it is important to describe persons currently eligible for treatment and medication use, particularly as more providers implement the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. To understand baseline estimates of U.S. adults on or eligible for cholesterol treatment, as well as to identify sex and racial/ethnic disparities, CDC analyzed data from the 2005-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Because the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines focus on initiation or continuation of cholesterol treatment, adults meeting the guidelines' eligibility criteria as well as adults who were currently taking cholesterol-lowering medication were assessed as a group. Overall, 36.7% of U.S. adults or 78.1 million persons aged ≥21 years were on or eligible for cholesterol treatment. Within this group, 55.5% were currently taking cholesterol-lowering medication, and 46.6% reported making lifestyle modifications, such as exercising, dietary changes, or controlling their weight, to lower cholesterol; 37.1% reported making lifestyle modifications and taking medication, and 35.5% reported doing neither. Among adults on or eligible for cholesterol-lowering medication, the proportion taking cholesterol-lowering medication was higher for women than men and for non-Hispanic whites (whites) than Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic blacks (blacks). Further efforts by clinicians and public health practitioners are needed to implement complementary and targeted patient education and disease management programs to reduce sex and racial/ethnic disparities among adults eligible for treatment of cholesterol.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Definição da Elegibilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Americanos Mexicanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA