RESUMO
Evaluation of disorders of the autonomic nervous system is both an art and a science, calling upon the physician's most astute clinical skills as well as knowledge of autonomic neurology and physiology. Over the last three decades, the development of noninvasive clinical tests that assess the function of autonomic nerves, the validation and standardization of these tests, and the growth of a large body of literature characterizing test results in patients with autonomic disorders have equipped clinical practice further with a valuable set of objective tools to assist diagnosis and prognosis. This review, based on current evidence, outlines an international expert consensus set of recommendations to guide clinical electrodiagnostic autonomic testing. Grading and localization of autonomic deficits incorporates scores from sympathetic cardiovascular adrenergic, parasympathetic cardiovagal, and sudomotor testing, as no single test alone is sufficient to diagnose the degree or distribution of autonomic failure. The composite autonomic severity score (CASS) is a useful score of autonomic failure that is normalized for age and gender. Valid indications for autonomic testing include generalized autonomic failure, regional or selective system syndromes of autonomic impairment, peripheral autonomic neuropathy and ganglionopathy, small fiber neuropathy, orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic intolerance, syncope, neurodegenerative disorders, autonomic hyperactivity, and anhidrosis.
Assuntos
Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/fisiologia , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Eletrodiagnóstico/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Eletrodiagnóstico/normas , Humanos , Neurologia/organização & administração , Neurofisiologia/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas , Sociedades CientíficasRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of the Orthostatic Discriminant and Severity Scale (ODSS) to distinguish symptoms of orthostatic intolerance from non-orthostatic symptoms. METHODS: Clinical evaluations and questionnaire responses were collected in 73 healthy controls and 132 patients referred to the Autonomic Disorders Clinic from September 1, 2016, through April 30, 2018, for queries regarding autonomic dysfunction. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to interpret sensitivity and specificity and to determine cutoff scores for symptom assessment. Inter-item reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. To calculate positive and negative predictive powers, patient data were collected in a single-blinded fashion where the researcher collecting questionnaire data was blinded to the clinical evaluation and diagnosis. Predictive powers were calculated using a chi-squared cross-tabulation. RESULTS: The orthostatic and non-orthostatic symptoms scores produced ROC curves with an area under the curve of 0.89 and 0.79, respectively. The orthostatic scores yielded a positive and negative predictive power value of 73% and 81%, respectively. Combined, the ODSS identified patients with and without orthostatic symptoms with an overall accuracy of 76%. The reliability of the ODSS was significant, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88, and all dichotomous items were deemed worthy of retention following an inter-item reliability assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The ODSS demonstrated a strong ability to distinguish patients with and without orthostatic intolerance and demonstrated sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of other standardized measures. Overall, the ODSS produces symptom scores that are both reliable and useful for both research and clinical practice.
Assuntos
Intolerância Ortostática/diagnóstico , Intolerância Ortostática/fisiopatologia , Postura/fisiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The identification of several mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions and the accumulation of the "common" 4.8-kb mitochondrial DNA deletion (mtDNA(4834)) with aging and experimental streptozotocin-induced diabetes (STZ) were studied in the rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Twenty-one mtDNA deletions, including mtDNA(4834), were identified in rat L4-L6 DRG mtDNA of 15-month-old Spraque-Dawley rats with 13 months of STZ and age-matched controls. These deletions were flanked by breakpoints that ranged from 16-bp direct repeats to no direct repeats. The sciatic nerve contained undetectable levels of mtDNA deletions. Levels of mtDNA(4834) in rat DRG mtDNA significantly accumulated with age at a rate much higher than those reported in the brain, yet were not statistically different in STZ. Southern blot analysis demonstrated no significant accumulation of the total amount of mtDNA deletions in STZ over age-matched controls. The accumulation of mtDNA(4834) has not been studied in rat peripheral nerve tissue. Our identification of several mtDNA deletions with and without direct repeats at their breakpoint support the hypothesis that deletions can occur by both the slip-replication model and random recombination. Although there is a significant increase in accumulation of mtDNA(4834) associated with aging, the lack of significant accumulations of mtDNA deletions in STZ over age-matched controls indicates that this type of mtDNA damage is likely not a major alteration in STZ, although the changes could be confined to a small population of neurons that undergo apoptosis between 8 and 15 months.