Home-based video assessment of ease of movement for patients with Duchenne: Interviews with physical therapists to select movement tasks.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) change their movement patterns to compensate for muscle weakness. The Duchenne Video Assessment (DVA) measures ease of movement through evaluation of compensatory movements. The DVA directs caregivers to video record patients performing home-based movement tasks using a mobile application, and DVA-certified physical therapists evaluate the videos using scorecards with prespecified compensatory movement criteria. Two qualitative interview studies were conducted to select movement tasks for the DVA that are relevant to patients with DMD and able to reflect changes in function. METHODS: Qualitative interviews with eligible physical therapists were conducted remotely. Physical therapists were asked to spontaneously suggest movement tasks prior to evaluating specific movement tasks selected a priori. Analysts conducted a content analysis to investigate whether movement tasks selected a priori were confirmed as relevant to the population of interest and able to show changes in function. RESULTS: The studies included five physical therapists to select tasks for ambulatory patients with DMD and six for non-ambulatory patients. For an ambulatory population, all five experts confirmed Climb Five Stairs, Run, Stand Up from Sitting, Sit Up from Supine, and Jump Forward, and four (80%) confirmed Walk as relevant and able to show functional changes. For a non-ambulatory population, all six experts confirmed Eat 10 Bites, Roll Over in Bed, Shift Weight in Bed, Take T-Shirt Off, Put T-Shirt On, Put Arms on Armrest, and Reach Across Table to Grab Cell Phone, and five (83%) confirmed Raise Hands Above Head as relevant and able to show functional changes. DISCUSSION: Physical therapists confirmed the DVA movement tasks as relevant to patients with DMD and able to reflect changes in function. The use of the DVA in clinical trials provides an opportunity to collect data not seen in clinic and reduce travel burden for families.

Validation of the North Star Assessment for Limb-Girdle Type Muscular Dystrophies.

OBJECTIVE: The North Star Assessment for limb-girdle type muscular dystrophies (NSAD), a clinician-reported outcome measure (ClinRO) of motor performance, was initially developed and validated for use in dysferlinopathy, an autosomal recessive form of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD R2/2B). Recent developments in treatments for limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD) have highlighted the urgent need for disease-specific ClinROs. The purpose of this study was to understand the ability of the NSAD to quantify motor function across the broad spectrum of LGMD phenotypes. METHODS: Assessments of 130 individuals with LGMD evaluated by the physical therapy teams at Nationwide Children's Hospital and the John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre were included in the analysis. NSAD, 100-m timed test (100MTT), and Performance of Upper Limb 2.0 assessment data were collected. Psychometric analysis with Rasch measurement methods was used to examine the NSAD for suitability and robustness by determining the extent to which the observed data "fit" with predictions of those ratings from the Rasch model. The NSAD score was correlated with the 100MTT and Performance of Upper Limb 2.0 assessment scores for external construct validity. RESULTS: The NSAD demonstrated a good spread of items covering a continuum of abilities across both individuals who had LGMD and were ambulatory and individuals who had LGMD and were weaker and nonambulatory. Items fit well with the construct measured, validating a summed total score. The NSAD had excellent interrater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.986, 95% CI = 0.981-0.991] and was highly correlated with the 100MTT walk/run velocity (Spearman rho correlation coefficient of rs(134) = .92). CONCLUSION: Although LGMD subtypes may differ in age of onset, rate of progression, and patterns of muscle weakness, the overall impact of progressive muscle weakness on motor function is similar. The NSAD is a reliable and valid ClinRO of motor performance for individuals with LGMD and is suitable for use in clinical practice and research settings. IMPACT: Recent developments in potential pharmacological treatments for LGMD have highlighted the urgent need for disease-specific outcome measures. Validated and meaningful outcome measures are necessary to capture disease presentation, to inform expected rates of progression, and as endpoints for measuring the response to interventions in clinical trials. The NSAD, a scale of motor performance for both individuals who have LGMD and are ambulatory and those who are nonambulatory, is suitable for use in clinical and research settings.

Development of Duchenne Video Assessment scorecards to evaluate ease of movement among those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) adopt compensatory movement patterns as muscles weaken. The Duchenne Video Assessment (DVA) measures patient ease of movement through identification of compensatory movement patterns. The DVA directs caregivers to video record patients performing specific movement tasks at home using a secure mobile application, and DVA-certified physical therapists (PTs) score the videos using scorecards with prespecified compensatory movement criteria. The goal of this study was to develop and refine the DVA scorecards. METHODS: To develop the initial scorecards, 4 PTs collaboratively created compensatory movement lists for each task, and researchers structured the lists into scorecards. A 2-round modified Delphi process was used to gather expert opinion on the understandability, comprehensiveness, and clinical meaningfulness of the compensatory movements on the scorecards. Eight PTs who had evaluated ≥50 patients with DMD and participated in ≥10 DMD clinical trials were recruited for the panel. In Round 1, panelists evaluated compensatory movement criteria understandability via questionnaire and tested the scorecards. In Round 2, panelists participated in an in-person meeting to discuss areas of disagreement from Round 1 and reach consensus (≥75% agreement) on all revisions to the scorecards. RESULTS: During the Round 1 revisions to the scorecards, there were 67 changes (44%) to the wording of 153 original compensatory movement criteria and 3 criteria were removed. During the Round 2 revisions to the scorecards, there were 47 changes (31%) to the wording of 150 compensatory movement criteria, 20 criteria were added, and 30 criteria were removed. The panel reached 100% agreement on all changes made to scorecards during Round 2. CONCLUSION: PTs with extensive experience evaluating patients with DMD confirmed that the compensatory movement criteria included in the DVA scorecards were understandable, comprehensive, and clinically meaningful.

Consensus Guidelines for Improving Quality of Assessment and Training for Neuromuscular Diseases.

Critical components of successful evaluation of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in multisite clinical trials and clinical practice are standardized training, administration, and documented reliability of scoring. Experiences of evaluators, alongside patient differences from regional standards of care, may contribute to heterogeneity in clinical center's expertise. Achieving low variability and high reliability of COA is fundamental to clinical research and to give confidence in our ability to draw rational, interpretable conclusions from the data collected. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a framework to guide the learning process for COAs for use in clinics and clinical trials to maximize reliability and validity of COAs in neuromuscular disease (NMD). This is a consensus-based guideline with contributions from fourteen leading experts in clinical outcomes and the field of clinical outcome training in NMD. This framework should guide reliable and valid assessments in NMD specialty clinics and clinical trials. This consensus aims to expedite study start up with a progressive training pathway ranging from research naïve to highly experienced clinical evaluators. This document includes recommendations for education guidelines and roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders in COA assessment and implementation to ensure quality and consistency of outcome administration across different settings.

Remote Delivery of Motor Function Assessment and Training for Clinical Trials in Neuromuscular Disease: A Response to the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.

Clinical outcome assessments of function or strength, assessed by physical therapists, are commonly used as primary endpoints in clinical trials, natural history studies and within clinics for individuals with neuromuscular disorders. These evaluations not only inform the efficacy of investigational agents in clinical trials, but also importantly track disease trajectory to prospectively advise need for equipment, home and work modifications, and other assistive devices. The COVID-19 pandemic had a global impact on the safety and feasibility of in-person visits and assessments, necessitating rapid development of mitigation strategies to ensure ongoing collection of key clinical trial endpoints and access to expert clinical care despite travel restrictions. Physical therapists who are expert in neuromuscular disorders working across clinics, countries, and clinical trials developed initial guidelines and methods for the suitability and feasibility of performing remote evaluations. A number of Sponsors introduced amendments to their study protocols to enable remote evaluations, supported by live video streaming of the assessment to their local clinical evaluators. Similarly, application of these techniques to clinical telemedicine enabled objective evaluations for use in payer discussions, equipment procurement, and general access to expert physical therapy services. Here we report on our methodology for adapting current practices to remote testing and considerations for remote evaluations.

Reliability and construct validity of the Duchenne Video Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: The Duchenne Video Assessment (DVA) assesses quality of movement as an indication of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) disease severity. Caregivers video record patients performing home-based movement tasks using a mobile application, and physical therapists (PTs) rate the videos using scorecards with prespecified compensatory movement criteria. Reliability and construct validity of the DVA were tested using video and Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) data from patients with DMD and healthy controls from a separate study. METHODS: Fifteen PTs were trained and certified as DVA raters. All raters scored videos of five subjects performing each movement task; nine raters rescored the same videos four weeks later. Three raters scored videos from an average of 25 subjects for each movement task. Aggregate scores were used to test construct validity. An expert DMD clinician assigned each video to a severity group for known-groups analyses. Differences between rater scores across severity groups were tested and correlations between DVA and PODCI scores were calculated. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) between all 15 raters ranged from 0.70 to 0.97 for all movement tasks. Mean intra-rater reliability ICC for nine raters ranged from 0.82 to 0.98 for all movement tasks. There were statistically significant differences between known severity groups for all movement tasks. The DVA correlated strongly with related PODCI constructs of physical function and weakly with unrelated constructs. DISCUSSION: The DVA was found to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring quality of movement as an indication of disease severity.

Assessment of Systemic Delivery of rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Micro-dystrophin gene transfer shows promise for treating patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) using recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype rh74 (rAAVrh74) and codon-optimized human micro-dystrophin driven by a skeletal and cardiac muscle-specific promoter with enhanced cardiac expression (MHCK7). Objective: To identify the 1-year safety and tolerability of intravenous rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin in patients with DMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, phase 1/2a nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted at the Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. It began on November 2, 2017, with a planned duration of follow-up of 3 years, ending in March 2021. The first 4 patients who met eligibility criteria were enrolled, consisting of ambulatory male children with DMD without preexisting AAVrh74 antibodies and a stable corticosteroid dose (≥12 weeks). Interventions: A single dose of 2.0 × 1014 vg/kg rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin was infused through a peripheral limb vein. Daily prednisolone, 1 mg/kg, started 1 day before gene delivery (30-day taper after infusion). Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included micro-dystrophin expression by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Functional outcomes measured by North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) and serum creatine kinase were exploratory outcomes. Results: Four patients were included (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 4.8 [1.0] years). All adverse events (n = 53) were considered mild (33 [62%]) or moderate (20 [38%]), and no serious adverse events occurred. Eighteen adverse events were considered treatment related, the most common of which was vomiting (9 of 18 events [50%]). Three patients had transiently elevated γ-glutamyltransferase, which resolved with corticosteroids. At 12 weeks, immunohistochemistry of gastrocnemius muscle biopsy specimens revealed robust transgene expression in all patients, with a mean of 81.2% of muscle fibers expressing micro-dystrophin with a mean intensity of 96% at the sarcolemma. Western blot showed a mean expression of 74.3% without fat or fibrosis adjustment and 95.8% with adjustment. All patients had confirmed vector transduction and showed functional improvement of NSAA scores and reduced creatine kinase levels (posttreatment vs baseline) that were maintained for 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: This trial showed rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin to be well tolerated and have minimal adverse events; the safe delivery of micro-dystrophin transgene; the robust expression and correct localization of micro-dystrophin protein; and improvements in creatine kinase levels and NSAA scores. These findings suggest that rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin can provide functional improvement that is greater than that observed under standard of care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375164.

'Learn From Every Patient': implementation and early results of a learning health system.

AIM: The convergence of three major trends in medicine, namely conversion to electronic health records (EHRs), prioritization of translational research, and the need to control healthcare expenditures, has created unprecedented interest and opportunities to develop systems that improve care while reducing costs. However, operationalizing a 'learning health system' requires systematic changes that have not yet been widely demonstrated in clinical practice. METHOD: We developed, implemented, and evaluated a model of EHR-supported care in a cohort of 131 children with cerebral palsy that integrated clinical care, quality improvement, and research, entitled 'Learn From Every Patient' (LFEP). RESULTS: Children treated in the LFEP Program for a 12-month period experienced a 43% reduction in total inpatient days (p=0.030 vs prior 12mo period), a 27% reduction in inpatient admissions, a 30% reduction in emergency department visits (p=0.001), and a 29% reduction in urgent care visits (p=0.046). LFEP Program implementation also resulted in reductions in healthcare costs of 210% (US$7014/child) versus a Time control group, and reductions of 176% ($6596/child) versus a Program Activities control group. Importantly, clinical implementation of the LFEP Program has also driven the continuous accumulation of robust research-quality data for both publication and implementation of evidence-based improvements in clinical care. INTERPRETATION: These results demonstrate that a learning health system can be developed and implemented in a cost-effective manner, and can integrate clinical care and research to systematically drive simultaneous clinical quality improvement and reduced healthcare costs.

Motor and cognitive assessment of infants and young boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: results from the Muscular Dystrophy Association DMD Clinical Research Network.

Therapeutic trials in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) exclude young boys because traditional outcome measures rely on cooperation. The Bayley III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley III) have been validated in developing children and those with developmental disorders but have not been studied in DMD. Expanded Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale (HFMSE) and North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) may also be useful in this young DMD population. Clinical evaluators from the MDA-DMD Clinical Research Network were trained in these assessment tools. Infants and boys with DMD (n = 24; 1.9 ± 0.7 years) were assessed. The mean Bayley III motor composite score was low (82.8 ± 8; p ≤ .0001) (normal = 100 ± 15). Mean gross motor and fine motor function scaled scores were low (both p ≤ .0001). The mean cognitive comprehensive (p=.0002), receptive language (p ≤ .0001), and expressive language (p = .0001) were also low compared to normal children. Age was negatively associated with Bayley III gross motor (r = -0.44; p = .02) but not with fine motor, cognitive, or language scores. HFMSE (n=23) showed a mean score of 31 ± 13. NSAA (n = 18 boys; 2.2 ± 0.4 years) showed a mean score of 12 ± 5. Outcome assessments of young boys with DMD are feasible and in this multicenter study were best demonstrated using the Bayley III.