Preliminary Validation of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment as a Measure of Hospital Mobility.

BACKGROUND: Despite heightened interest, measurement of hospital mobility remains challenging. Available assessment tools lack patient input regarding level and frequency of hospital mobility. The purpose of this study was to validate a brief self-reported mobility assessment to measure out-of-bed activity during hospitalization. METHODS: We recruited cognitively intact hospitalized adults (age ≥ 65 years) who walked prior to admission, to wear an accelerometer for 24 hours, and to complete the Acute Care Mobility Assessment (ACMA), a self-report of mobility that ranges from bed rest to walking off the hospital unit in the prior 24 hours. For each mobility level from sitting in a chair to walking off the unit, patients reported the frequency of the activity and the need for help from another person or equipment. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated using several scoring algorithms to compare ACMA to accelerometer data. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (mean age 74.3 [standard deviation 6.2] years, 63% female, 39% Black) had complete data. Steps taken in 24 hours ranged from 10 to 2 831. Correlation analyses identified strong associations between ACMA scores and total steps, and moderate correlations with total time walking using all algorithms. However, the unweighted frequency count using the 3 ambulation levels only (walking in room, in hall, and off ward) had the highest correlation with total steps (r = 0.84; p < .001) and total time walking (r = 0.66; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ACMA is a valid measure of mobility among cognitively intact hospitalized older adults. The ACMA may add value to our current armamentarium of tools by adding patient reports of hospital mobility.

National Norms for Hospitalizations Due to Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions among Adults in the US.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are acute or chronic health issues that lead to potentially preventable hospitalizations when not treated in the outpatient primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe national hospitalization rates due to ACSCs among adult inpatients in the US. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project at the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality was completed in the year 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were adult inpatients from community hospitals in 48 states of the US and District of Columbia. MAIN MEASURES: ACSC admission rates were calculated using ICD-10 codes and the Purdy ACSC definition. The admission rates were weighted to the US inpatient population and stratified by age, sex, and race. KEY RESULTS: ACSC hospitalization rates varied considerably across age and average number of hospitalizations varied across sex and race. ACSC hospitalization rates increased with age, male sex, and Native American and Black race. The most common ACSCs were pneumonia, diabetes, and congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have emphasized the importance of preventable hospitalizations, however, the national rates for ACSC hospitalizations across all ages in the US have not been reported. The national rates presented will facilitate comparisons to identify hospitals and health care systems with higher-than-expected rates of ACSC admissions that may suggest a need for improved primary care services.

A systematic review and meta-analysis: Assessment of hospital walking programs among older patients.

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess effect of hospital walking programs on outcomes for older inpatients and to characterize hospital walking dose reported across studies. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis examining impact of hospital walking and/or reported walking dose among medical-surgical inpatients. For inclusion, studies were observational or experimental, published in English, enrolled inpatients aged ≥ 65 yrs hospitalized for medical or surgical reasons. METHODS: Searches of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, NICHSR, OneSearch, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PsycINFO were completed in December 2020. Two reviewers screened sources, extracted data, and performed quality bias appraisal. RESULTS: Hospital walking dose was reported in 6 studies and commonly as steps/24 hr. Length of stay (LOS) was a common outcome reported. Difference in combined mean LOS between walking and control groups was -5.89 days. Heterogeneity across studies was considerable (I2  = 96%) suggesting poor precision of estimates. Additional, high-quality trials examining hospital walking and patient outcomes of older patients is needed.