Contemporary Analysis of Reexcision and Conversion to Mastectomy Rates and Associated Healthcare Costs for Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of population-level reoperation rates and incremental healthcare costs associated with reoperation for patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using Merative™ MarketScan® commercial insurance data and Medicare 5% fee-for-service claims data. The study included females aged 18-64 years in the commercial cohort and females aged 18 years and older in the Medicare cohort, who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer in 2017-2019. Reoperation rates within a year of the initial BCS and overall 1-year healthcare costs stratified by reoperation status were measured. RESULTS: The commercial cohort included 17,129 women with a median age of 55 (interquartile range [IQR] 49-59) years, and the Medicare cohort included 6977 women with a median age of 73 (IQR 69-78) years. Overall reoperation rates were 21.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.5-21.8%) for the commercial cohort and 14.9% (95% CI 14.1-15.7%) for the Medicare cohort. In both cohorts, reoperation rates decreased as age increased, and conversion to mastectomy was more prevalent among younger women in the commercial cohort. The mean healthcare costs during 1 year of follow-up from the initial BCS were $95,165 for the commercial cohort and $36,313 for the Medicare cohort. Reoperations were associated with 24% higher costs in both the commercial and Medicare cohorts, which translated into $21,607 and $8559 incremental costs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of reoperation after BCS have remained high and have contributed to increased healthcare costs. Continuing efforts to reduce reoperation need more attention.

Impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on Breast Surgical Oncology fellow education.

INTRODUCTION: The early COVID-19 pandemic rapidly transformed healthcare and medical education. We sought to evaluate the professional and personal impact of the pandemic on 2019-2020 Breast Surgical Oncology (BSO) fellows in Society of Surgical Oncology approved programs to capture the experience and direct future changes. METHODS: From July 15, 2020 to August 4, 2020 a survey was administered to the American Society of Breast Surgeons' fellow members. The survey assessed the impact of the pandemic on clinical experience, education/research opportunities, personal health/well-being, and future career. Responses were collected and aggregated to quantify the collective experience of respondents. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of fifty-seven (54%) eligible fellows responded. Twenty-one (75%) indicated the clinical experience changed. Twenty-seven (96%) reported less time spent caring for ambulatory breast patients and sixteen (57%) reported the same/more time spent in the operating room. Fourteen (50%) stated their future job was impacted and eight (29%) delayed general surgery board examinations. Stress was increased in 26 (93%). Personal health was unaffected in 20 (71%), and 3 (10%) quarantined for COVID-19 exposure/infection. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic altered the clinical experience of BSO fellows; however, the operative experience was generally unaffected. The creation of frameworks and support mechanisms to mitigate potential challenges for fellows and fellowship programs in the ongoing pandemic and other times of national crisis should be considered.

Predicting treatment Response based on Dual assessment of magnetic resonance Imaging kinetics and Circulating Tumor cells in patients with Head and Neck cancer (PREDICT-HN): matching 'liquid biopsy' and quantitative tumor modeling.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has improved capacity to visualize tumor and soft tissue involvement in head and neck cancers. Using advanced MRI, we can interrogate cell density using diffusion weighted imaging, a quantitative imaging that can be used during radiotherapy, when diffuse inflammatory reaction precludes PET imaging, and can assist with target delineation as well. Correlation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) measurements with 3D quantitative tumor characterization could potentially allow selective, patient-specific response-adapted escalation or de-escalation of local therapy, and improve the therapeutic ratio, curing the greatest number of patients with the least toxicity. METHODS: The proposed study is designed as a prospective observational study and will collect pretreatment CT, MRI and PET/CT images, weekly serial MR imaging during RT and post treatment CT, MRI and PET/CT images. In addition, blood sample will be collected for biomarker analysis at those time intervals. CTC assessments will be performed on the CellSave tube using the FDA-approved CellSearch® Circulating Tumor Cell Kit (Janssen Diagnostics), and plasma from the EDTA blood samples will be collected, labeled with a de-identifying number, and stored at - 80 °C for future analyses. DISCUSSION: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the prognostic value and correlation of weekly tumor response kinetics (gross tumor volume and MR signal changes) and circulating tumor cells of mucosal head and neck cancers during radiation therapy using MRI in predicting treatment response and clinical outcomes. This study will provide landmark information as to the utility of CTCs ('liquid biopsy) and tumor-specific functional quantitative imaging changes during treatment to guide personalization of treatment for future patients. Combining the biological information from CTCs and the structural information from MRI may provide more information than either modality alone. In addition, this study could potentially allow us to determine the optimal time to obtain MR imaging and/ or CTCs during radiotherapy to assess tumor response and provide guidance for patient selection and stratification for future dose escalation or de-escalation strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03491176 ). Date of registration: 9th April 2018. (retrospectively registered). Date of enrolment of the first participant: 30th May 2017.

Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The recently published SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins concluded "no ink on tumor" is the standard for an adequate margin. This study was conducted to determine how this guideline is aligned with current clinical practice. METHODS: A survey was sent to 3057 members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Questions assessed respondents' clinical practice type and duration, familiarity with the guideline, and preferences for margin re-excision. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 777 (25%) responded. Most (92%) indicated familiarity with the guideline. Of these respondents, the majority (n = 678, or 94.7%) would re-excise all or most of the time when tumor extended to the inked margin. Very few (n = 9, or 1.3%) would re-excise all or most of the time when tumor was within 2 mm of the margin. Over 12 % (n = 90) would re-excise all or most of the time for a triple-negative tumor within 1 mm of the margin, whereas 353 (49.6%) would re-excise all or most of the time when imaging and pathology were discordant, and tumor was within 1 mm of multiple margins. Finally, 330 (45.8%) would re-excise all or most of the time when multiple foci of ductal carcinoma in situ extended to within 1 mm of multiple inked margins. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons are in agreement to re-excise margins when tumor touches ink and generally not to perform re-excisions when tumor is close to (but not touching) the inked margin. For more complex scenarios, surgeons are utilizing their individual clinical judgment to determine the need for re-excision.

Prospective assessment of lymphedema incidence and lymphedema-associated symptoms following lymph node surgery for melanoma.

We aimed to prospectively assess limb volume change (LVC) and associated symptoms in patients with melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or therapeutic lymph node dissection. Limb volume was measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months using a perometer (1000 mol/l). LVC was calculated and used to define three groups: less than 5%, 5-10%, and greater than 10%. A 19-item lymphedema symptom questionnaire was administered at baseline, 6, and 12 months. One hundred and eighty-two patients were enrolled. Twelve months after axillary surgery, 9% had LVC 5-10% and 13% had LVC greater than 10%. Twelve months after inguinofemoral surgery, 10% had LVC 5-10% and 13% had LVC greater than 10%. There was a significant seven- to nine-fold increase in symptoms for patients with LVC greater than 10% compared with those with LVC less than 5% (P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, therapeutic lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (odds ratio=3.18; P<0.01) and borderline significance for lower-extremity versus upper-extremity procedures (odds ratio=1.72; P=0.07) were associated with LVC greater than 5%. LVC greater than 5% is common at 12 months following nodal surgery for melanoma and is associated with symptoms. Informed consent for melanoma patients undergoing lymph node surgery should include a discussion of the risks of postoperative lymphedema.

Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively assessed the incidence, risk factors, and costs associated with wound complications and lymphedema in melanoma patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 53 melanoma patients were accrued to 2 trials (June 2005 to July 2008) that included prospective evaluations of postoperative complications; 30-day wound complications included infection, seroma, and/or dehiscence. There were 20 patients who underwent limb volume measurement and completed a 19-item lymphedema symptom assessment questionnaire preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate potential risk factors for complications. A microcosting analysis was also performed to evaluate the direct costs associated with wound complications. RESULTS: The 30-day wound complications were noted in 77.4% of patients. A BMI ≥ 30 (n = 28) increased the risk for wound complications (odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.6-78.5, P = .01), while advanced nodal disease approached significance (OR = 9.0, 95%CI: 0.79-103.1, P = .08). Other risk factors, including diabetes, smoking, and the addition of a deep pelvic (iliac/obturator) dissection to ILND, were not significant. Of 20 patients, 9 (45%) developed limb volume change (LVC) ≥5% at 3 months, with associated mean symptom scores of 6.1 versus 4.6 for those without LVC. Costs for patients with wound complications were significantly higher than for those without wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative wound complications and early onset lymphedema occur frequently following ILND for melanoma. Obesity is an adverse risk factor for 30-day wound complications that can significantly increase postoperative costs, as is likely the case for advanced disease. Risk reduction practices and novel treatment approaches are needed to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Fibrin sealant does not decrease seroma output or time to drain removal following inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in melanoma patients: a randomized controlled trial (NCT00506311).

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of closed suction drains and evaluated whether the intraoperative use of a fibrin sealant decreased time to drain removal and wound complications in melanoma patients undergoing inguino-femoral lymph node dissection. METHODS: A pilot study (n = 18) assessed the impact of a closed suction drain following inguino-femoral lymph node dissection. A single-institution, prospective trial was then performed in which patients were randomized to a group that received intraoperative application of a fibrin sealant following inguino-femoral lymph node dissection or to a control group that did not receive sealant. RESULTS: The majority of the patients enrolled felt the drains caused moderate or severe discomfort and difficulties with activities of daily living. Thirty patients were then randomized; the median time to drain removal in the control group (n = 14) was 30 days (range, 13-74) compared to 29 days (range, 11-45) in the fibrin sealant group (n = 16; P = 0.6). Major and minor complications were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative closed suction drains were associated with major patient inconvenience. Applying a fibrin sealant at the time of inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in melanoma patients did not reduce the time to drain removal or postoperative morbidity. Alternative strategies are needed.

Assessment of the current Medicare reimbursement system for breast cancer operations.

BACKGROUND: Medicare determines procedural reimbursement by means of formulas considering physician work, practice, and liability expenses. Since no mechanism exists to consider outcomes in calculating reimbursements, we hypothesized that Medicare reimbursements do not correlate with outcomes for different breast cancer operations. METHODS: We prospectively studied 240 patients with T1, 2N0M0 breast cancer in three surgical treatment arms: segmental mastectomy with axillary node dissection (SM&ALND ; n = 42); SM with sentinel node dissection (SM&SLND ; n = 96); and mastectomy without reconstruction (MRM; n = 102). Outcome parameters of complications, hospital stay, analgesic usage, and days to return to work were correlated with procedure reimbursements. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 26 months. SM&SLND patients rarely required hospital stays (14%) in comparison with either SM&ALND (96%) or MRM patients (99%) (P < 0.001). SM&ALND and MRM patients required 9 and 10 median days of narcotics, respectively, versus 1 day in the SLND group (P < 0.001). SM&SLND patients returned to work at a median of 3 days, in comparison with 19 for SM&ALND and 26 for MRM patients (P < 0.001). Complications were more common in the MRM group (67% numbness/10% pain) and the SM&ALND group (56%/9%) than in the SM&SLND group (0%/1%). Reimbursements were inversely correlated with outcomes. MRM was reimbursed the highest, at an average of 1,075.03 dollars, with SM&ALND at 882.72 dollars. SM&SLND was reimbursed at 642.00 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare reimbursements for breast cancer operations do not correlate with outcomes. Less-invasive procedures are paid for at lower rates despite better outcomes and fewer complications. The data from this study raise the question of the impact of reimbursement on breast procedure selection.