Capitated reimbursement for medical services returns control of the patient to the surgeon.

Limiting the spending on healthcare services is a societal necessity, whether externally budget-driven with reduced fee for service or salary, or internally controlled through prospective payment capitation. No reimbursement system is inherently good or bad. Ethical physicians will place patient well-being first and focus on the delivery of quality care, regardless of the payment method. There are several methods for the distribution of capitation payments to physicians, each with different levels of financial incentive to provide services. In one fully evolved embodiment of capitation, a payer carves out the entire orthopedic disease segment and contracts with an orthopedic organization for all musculoskeletal services within a defined geographic region. This form of capitation offers the advantage of returning control of patient care to the orthopedic surgeon.

Radiosynovectomy's clinical applications and cost effectiveness: a review.

It is apparent that from the work of the authors and many others, including the work of Rivard, Sledge, Zuckerman, among others, that radiosynovectomy has an important role to play in providing effective treatment of affected joints associated with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of arthritis as well as the hemophiliac joint. The treatment offers relief from the effects of recurrent joint effusion with an approximately 60% to 66% favorable response and from recurrent hemarthrosis in the hemophiliac joint with an approximately 75% to 80% favorable response. The impact of providing radiosynovectomy as an alternative to surgical synovectomy is seen, where postoperative side effects such as joint stiffness are avoided, improved quality of life is repeatedly documented, and the cost savings in health care dollars, particularly evident in the hemophiliac joint in this relatively small population, are potentially enormous. With almost two million people in the United States suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, the potential savings in health care dollars is also enormous. As with any use of in vivo radiopharmaceuticals, the potential for radiation-induced damage exists. However, with a 25 plus year record of use, more optimally configured radiopharmaceuticals, and the addition of maneuvers to minimize potential joint leakage, the risk of radiation induced damage appears to be minimal. It appears as though radiosynovectomy is an effective as well as cost-effective alternative to surgical synovectomy and is becoming the procedure of choice particularly in the hemophiliac patient with recurrent hemarthrosis and synovitis who has failed medical therapy. It is also the procedure of choice in patients for whom surgery is contraindicated because of the presence of clotting factor inhibitors.

Disability evaluation in arthritis patients.

During the working years, rheumatic conditions are the foremost cause of disability in the United States. Disability evaluation for Social Security applicants and Workers' Compensation patients is commonplace in orthopedic practices. Yet, formal education in this aspect of patient care is rare both during and after residency. Because of a lack of understanding and sophistication the physician who knows the patient better than any other evaluator often play a minor role in the determination of disability. Disability Evaluation Under Social Security--A Handbook for Physicians lists the medical criteria necessary for qualification. Severely disabled arthritis patients will not always fit into these various categories and may have to be considered under the rule of medical equivalency. Workers' Compensation statutes vary somewhat from state to state but generally include disability criteria. Familiarity with these criteria and the process involved will allow the orthopedist to communicate more meaningfully with administrators and will reduce much of the frustration and some of the cost inherent in this system. When subjective complaint (illness) is in excess of apparent organic pathology (disease), team evaluation under the direction of the treating physician will help sort out the dilemma and develop a treatment plan. One hopes that this will bring the illness more in line with the disease, and thus reduce the disability.