From conceptual to computational: Cost and benefits of lizard thermoregulation revisited.

A classic paper detailed conceptual analyses of behavioral thermoregulation (Huey and Slatkin, 1976) and has served as the theoretical foundation for hundreds of investigative studies. Most recently, investigators have revisited this theoretical presentation to offer additional interpretation for both heterogeneity and spatial structure of temperature and how it may influence energetic costs (Sears and Angilletta, 2015). Interestingly, this foundational presentation by Huey and Slatkin, over 40 years ago, has never received formal computational analyses to address mathematically the postulates of this conceptual model. Here we use functions that closely mimic those that were described by Huey and Slatkin to provide both a theoretical and computational analysis for the cost and benefits of lizard thermoregulation. We demonstrate both the utility and inherent accuracy of their analyses using a model that was developed conceptually without the use of now readily available computational tools. But contrary to Huey and Slatkin's analyses, we provide a mathematical proof that perfect thermoregulation is never an optimal strategy and show by computational analysis that thermoregulatory strategy (k ) may decrease, not increase, with increasing cost.

Modeling energetic and theoretical costs of thermoregulatory strategy.

Poikilothermic ectotherms have evolved behaviours that help them maintain or regulate their body temperature (T (b)) around a preferred or 'set point' temperature (T (set)). Thermoregulatory behaviors may range from body positioning to optimize heat gain to shuttling among preferred microhabitats to find appropriate environmental temperatures. We have modelled movement patterns between an active and non-active shuttling behaviour within a habitat (as a biased random walk) to investigate the potential cost of two thermoregulatory strategies. Generally, small-bodied ectotherms actively thermoregulate while large-bodied ectotherms may passively thermoconform to their environment. We were interested in the potential energetic cost for a large-bodied ectotherm if it were forced to actively thermoregulate rather than thermoconform. We therefore modelled movements and the resulting and comparative energetic costs in precisely maintaining a T (set) for a small-bodied versus large-bodied ectotherm to study and evaluate the thermoregulatory strategy.