RESUMO
Background Imaging of structural disease in osteoarthritis has traditionally relied on MRI and radiography. Joint space mapping (JSM) can be used to quantitatively map joint space width (JSW) in three dimensions from CT images. Purpose To demonstrate the reproducibility, repeatability, and feasibility of JSM of the knee using weight-bearing CT images. Materials and Methods Two convenience samples of weight-bearing CT images of left and right knees with radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grades (KLGs) less than or equal to 2 were acquired from 2014 to 2018 and were analyzed retrospectively with JSM to deliver three-dimensional JSW maps. For reproducibility, images of three sets of knees were used for novice training, and then the JSM output was compared against an expert's assessment. JSM was also performed on 2-week follow-up images in the second cohort, yielding three-dimensional JSW difference maps for repeatability. Statistical parametric mapping was performed on all knee imaging data (KLG, 0-4) to show the feasibility of a surface-based analysis in three dimensions. Results Reproducibility (in 20 individuals; mean age, 58 years ± 7 [standard deviation]; mean body mass index, 28 kg/m2 ± 6; 14 women) and repeatability (in nine individuals; mean age, 53 years ± 6; mean body mass index, 26 kg/m2 ± 4; seven women) reached their lowest performance at a smallest detectable difference less than ±0.1 mm in the central medial tibiofemoral joint space for individuals without radiographically demonstrated disease. The average root mean square coefficient of variation was less than 5% across all groups. Statistical parametric mapping (33 individuals; mean age, 57 years ± 7; mean body mass index, 27 kg/m2 ± 6; 23 women) showed that the central-to-posterior medial joint space was significantly narrower by 0.5 mm for each incremental increase in the KLG (threshold P < .05). One knee (KLG, 2) demonstrated a baseline versus 24-month change in its three-dimensional JSW distribution that was beyond the smallest detectable difference across the lateral joint space. Conclusion Joint space mapping of the knee using weight-bearing CT images is feasible, demonstrating a relationship between the three-dimensional joint space width distribution and structural joint disease. It is reliably learned by novice users, can be personalized for disease phenotypes, and can be used to achieve a smallest detectable difference that is at least 50% smaller than that reported to be achieved at the highest performance level in radiography. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Roemer in this issue.
Assuntos
Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Suporte de Carga , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Objective: To determine reliability among four experienced and calibrated readers in cross-sectional and longitudinal semi-quantitative MRI assessments of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) study. Design: From all MOST participants with at least one knee with readable 60-month and 84-month paired knee MRIs (1.0 âT extremity systems), we selected 10 subjects having a spectrum of baseline disease severity of cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage and a spectrum of longitudinal changes in severity at 24 months follow-up. MRIs were independently assessed using the WORMS grading system by four musculoskeletal radiologists with the chronological sequence known to the readers. Kappa statistics were used to determine agreement between each pair of readers and Kendall's coefficient of concordance to determine average agreement across readers. Results: For most features, cross-sectional reliability was substantial to almost perfect. Regarding longitudinal reliability (detection of longitudinal change), inter-reader reliability as weighted kappa values ranged from 0.62 to 0.78 for cartilage damage, 0.75-0.88 for bone marrow lesions, 0.75-0.92 for meniscal tears, 0.67-0.95 for meniscal extrusion, 0.51-0.77 for bone attrition, 0.43-0.76 for osteophytes, 0.31-0.70 for Hoffa-synovitis, and 0.47-0.85 for effusion-synovitis. Kendall's coefficient ranged from 0.65 to 0.98. Conclusion: High levels of cross-sectional reliability and moderate to high longitudinal reliability was achieved using four experienced readers in semiquantitative MRI-assessment of most knee OA features.
RESUMO
The analogy between genomics and imaging has been an important touchstone in the debate on how secondary findings should be handled in both clinical and research genomics contexts. However, a critical eye is needed to understand whether an analogy like this one provides an adequate basis for policymaking in genomics. Genomics and imaging are undoubtedly similar in certain ways, but whether that similarity is adequate to justify adopting identical policies is a task that requires further analysis. This is highlighted by the fact that secondary findings are produced in other domains of medicine and public health, such as newborn screening programs, routine laboratory panels, and antibiotic sensitivity testing, and that the practices for handling secondary findings in each of these areas are different. These examples demonstrate that medicine has no single comprehensive policy or set of practices for managing secondary findings. Analogies to imaging, newborn screening, routine testing panels, and antibiotic sensitivity testing all lead to different policy options for genomics. In this piece we argue that analogies are a powerful way of driving policy discussions by rendering two different areas of medical practice similar, but an overdependence on a single analogy risks limiting policy discussions in potentially deleterious ways.
Assuntos
Revelação/ética , Testes Genéticos/ética , Genômica/ética , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Saúde Pública/ética , Diagnóstico por Imagem/ética , Revelação/legislação & jurisprudência , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Recém-Nascido , Análise de Sequência de DNARESUMO
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is more common in females than in males; however, the biological mechanisms for the difference in sex in patients with knee OA are not well understood. Knee shape is associated with OA and with sex, but the patterns of change in the bone's shape over time and their relation to sex and OA are unknown and may help inform how sex is associated with shape and OA and whether the effect is exerted early or later in life.Questions/purposes (1) Does knee shape segregate stably into different groups of trajectories of change (groups of knees that share similar patterns of changes in bone shape over time)? (2) Do females and males have different trajectories of bone shape changes? (3) Is radiographic OA at baseline associated with trajectories of bone shape changes? METHODS: We used data collected from the NIH-funded Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) to evaluate a cohort of people aged 45 to 79 years at baseline who had either symptomatic knee OA or were at high risk of having it. The OAI cohort included 4796 participants (58% females; n = 2804) at baseline who either had symptomatic knee OA (defined as having radiographic tibiofemoral knee OA and answering positively to the question "have you had pain, aching or stiffness around the knee on most days for at least one month during the past 12 months") or were at high risk of symptomatic knee OA (defined as having knee symptoms during the prior 12 months along with any of the following: overweight; knee injury; knee surgery other than replacement; family history of total knee replacement for OA; presence of Heberden's nodes; daily knee bending activity) or were part of a small nonexposed subcohort. From these participants, we limited the eligible group to those with radiographs available and read at baseline, 2 years, and 4 years, and randomly selected participants from each OAI subcohort in a manner to enrich representation in the study of the progression and nonexposed subcohorts, which were smaller in number than the OA incidence subcohort. From these patients, we randomly sampled 473 knees with radiographs available at baseline, 2 years, and 4 years. We outlined the shape of the distal femur and proximal tibia on radiographs at all three timepoints using statistical shape modelling. Five modes (each mode represents a particular type of knee bone shape variation) were derived for the proximal tibia and distal femur's shape, accounting for 78% of the total variance in shape. Group-based trajectory modelling (a statistical approach to identify the clusters of participants following a similar progression of change of bone shape over time, that is, trajectory group) was used to identify distinctive patterns of change in the bone shape for each mode. We examined the association of sex and radiographic OA at baseline with the trajectories of each bone shape mode using a multivariable polytomous regression model while adjusting for age, BMI, and race. RESULTS: Knee bone shape change trajectories segregated stably into different groups. In all modes, three distinct trajectory groups were derived, with the mean posterior probabilities (a measure of an individual's probability of being in a particular group and often used to characterize how well the trajectory model is working to describe the population) ranging from 84% to 99%, indicating excellent model fitting. For most of the modes of both the femur and tibia, the intercepts for the three trajectory groups were different; however, the rates of change were generally similar in each mode. Females and males had different trajectories of bone shape change. For Mode 1 in the femur, females were more likely to be in trajectory Groups 3 (odds ratio 30.2 [95% CI 12.2 to 75.0]; p < 0.001) and 2 than males (OR 4.1 [95% CI 2.3 to 7.1]; p < 0.001); thus, females had increased depth of the intercondylar fossa and broader shaft width relative to epicondylar width compared with males. For Mode 1 in the tibia, females were less likely to be in trajectory Group 2 (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.3 to 0.9]; p = 0.01) than males (that is, knees of females were less likely to display superior elevation of tibial plateau or decreased shaft width relative to head width). Radiographic OA at baseline was associated with specific shape-change trajectory groups. For Mode 1 in the femur, knees with OA were less likely to be in trajectory Groups 3 (OR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.8]; p = 0.008) and 2 (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.3 to 1.0]; p = 0.03) than knees without OA; thus, knees with OA had decreased depth of the intercondylar fossa and narrower shaft width relative to epicondylar width compared with knees without OA. For Mode 1 in the tibia, knees with OA were not associated with trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: The shapes of the distal femur and proximal tibia did not change much over time. Sex and baseline knee radiographic OA status are associated with the trajectory of change in the bone's shape, suggesting that both may contribute earlier in life to the associations among trajectories observed in older individuals. Future studies might explore sex-related bone shape change earlier in life to help determine when the sex-specific shapes arise and also the degree to which these sex-related shapes are alterable by injury or other events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.
Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
As genomic science has evolved, so have policy and practice debates about how to describe and evaluate the ways in which genomic information is treated for individuals, institutions, and society. The term genetic exceptionalism, describing the concept that genetic information is special or unique, and specifically different from other kinds of medical information, has been utilized widely, but often counterproductively in these debates. We offer genomic contextualism as a new term to frame the characteristics of genomic science in the debates. Using stasis theory to draw out the important connection between definitional issues and resulting policies, we argue that the framework of genomic contextualism is better suited to evaluating genomics and its policy-relevant features to arrive at more productive discussion and resolve policy debates.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/ética , Genômica/ética , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Disseminação de Informação/ética , Privacidade Genética/ética , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos/normas , Formulação de Políticas , Medicina de Precisão , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The aim of this study has been to test reproducibility of fractal signature analysis (FSA) in a young, active patient population taking into account several parameters including intra- and inter-reader placement of regions of interest (ROIs) as well as various aspects of projection geometry. In total, 685 patients were included (135 athletes and 550 non-athletes, 18-36 years old). Regions of interest (ROI) were situated beneath the medial tibial plateau. The reproducibility of texture parameters was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Multi-dimensional assessment included: (1) anterior-posterior (A.P.) vs. posterior-anterior (P.A.) (Lyon-Schuss technique) views on 102 knees; (2) unilateral (single knee) vs. bilateral (both knees) acquisition on 27 knees (acquisition technique otherwise identical; same A.P. or P.A. view); (3) repetition of the same image acquisition on 46 knees (same A.P. or P.A. view, and same unitlateral or bilateral acquisition); and (4) intra- and inter-reader reliability with repeated placement of the ROIs in the subchondral bone area on 99 randomly chosen knees. ICC values on the reproducibility of texture parameters for A.P. vs. P.A. image acquisitions for horizontal and vertical dimensions combined were 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.74) ranging from 0.47 to 0.81 for the different dimensions. For unilateral vs. bilateral image acquisitions, the ICCs were 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82) ranging from 0.55 to 0.88. For the repetition of the identical view, the ICCs were 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84) ranging from 0.67 to 0.85. Intra-reader reliability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94) and inter-observer reliability was 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99). A decrease in reliability was observed with increasing voxel sizes. Our study confirms excellent intra- and inter-reader reliability for FSA, however, results seem to be affected by acquisition technique, which has not been previously recognized.
Assuntos
Fractais , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Medicina Esportiva , Adolescente , Adulto , Osso e Ossos/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Joelho/patologia , Perna (Membro)/diagnóstico por imagem , Perna (Membro)/patologia , Masculino , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite/patologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/patologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Radiografia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Futebol , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe a scoring system for quantification of cartilage lesions (Cartilage Lesion Score [CaLS]), to determine its reproducibility, to examine the association of CaLS-detected longitudinal change with known risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) progression by comparing a group of subjects with OA risk factors with a group of subjects without OA risk factors, and to compare the CaLS system with the established semiquantitative Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) systems in terms of detection of cartilage defect progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All subjects provided written informed consent, and the local institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. Fifty-two subjects with and 25 subjects without risk factors for knee OA were randomly selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Inclusion criteria were age of 45-60 years, body mass index of 19-27 kg/m(2), and no knee pain or OA on radiographs at baseline. Baseline and 24-month follow-up right knee 3-T magnetic resonance images were analyzed with WORMS, BLOKS, and CaLS systems. Progression of cartilage lesions with each scoring system was compared by using multilevel mixed-effects linear-regression models. κ values were calculated to determine reliability. RESULTS: Intraclass coefficient values for inter- and intraobserver reliability of the CaLS system were 0.86 and 0.91, respectively. Interobserver κ value range for individual features was 0.81-0.94. The CaLS system enabled significantly higher detection of cartilage lesion progression than did WORMS or BLOKS systems (P < .001); 51.8% (56 of 108), 17.6% (19 of 108), and 13.0% (14 of 108) of the lesions progressed when analyzed with the CaLS, WORMS, and BLOKS systems, respectively. With the CaLS system, subjects with OA risk factors had significantly higher odds of progression than did subjects without risk factors (odds ratio, 2.78; P = .005). CONCLUSION: The CaLS system is a reproducible scoring system for cartilage lesions that yields an improved detection rate for monitoring progression when compared with detection rates of semiquantitative WORMS and BLOKS systems.
Assuntos
Cartilagem Articular/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To introduce a comprehensive and reliable scoring system for the assessment of whole-knee joint synovitis based on contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI. METHODS: Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) is a cohort study of people with, or at high risk of, knee osteoarthritis (OA). Subjects are an unselected subset of MOST who volunteered for CE-MRI. Synovitis was assessed at 11 sites of the joint. Synovial thickness was scored semiquantitatively: grade 0 (<2 mm), grade 1 (2-4 mm) and grade 2 (>4 mm) at each site. Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed the readings and inter- and intrareader reliability was evaluated. Whole-knee synovitis was assessed by summing the scores from all sites. The association of Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index pain score with this summed score and with the maximum synovitis grade for each site was assessed. RESULTS: 400 subjects were included (mean age 58.8±7.0 years, body mass index 29.5±4.9 kg/m(2), 46% women). For individual sites, intrareader reliability (weighted κ) was 0.67-1.00 for reader 1 and 0.60-1.00 for reader 2. Inter-reader agreement (κ) was 0.67-0.92. For the summed synovitis scores, intrareader reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC)) was 0.98 and 0.96 for each reader and inter-reader agreement (ICC) was 0.94. Moderate to severe synovitis in the parapatellar subregion was associated with the higher maximum pain score (adjusted OR (95% CI), 2.8 (1.4 to 5.4) and 3.1 (1.2 to 7.9), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive semiquantitative scoring system for the assessment of whole-knee synovitis is proposed. It is reliable and identifies knees with pain, and thus is a potentially powerful tool for synovitis assessment in epidemiological OA studies.
Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Sinovite/diagnóstico , Sinovite/etiologia , Idoso , Meios de Contraste , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Dor/etiologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Sinovite/patologiaRESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Development of new agents to induce fracture healing requires more sensitive methods to detect early changes in fracture repair. The aims of this study were to determine quantitative and qualitative features of fracture healing using volumetric computed tomography (CT) and to compare them with conventional radiography during the weeks following uncomplicated fractures of the appendicular skeleton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 39 otherwise healthy men and women with acute, closed fractures of the distal radius, tibial and/or fibular malleoli, or tibial shaft, were enrolled and underwent CT and X-ray imaging at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 (tibial shaft only) weeks post fracture. Qualitative assessment included fracture line/margins, fracture gap, external callus appearance, callus-to-cortex ratio, bridging, and radiologic union. Quantitative assessment of CT density changes (Hounsfield units [HU]) in the fracture gap was performed in a subset of 8 fracture patients using MEDx multimodality image analysis software (Sterling,VA). The analysis was performed by drawing free form regions of interest (ROI) covering the fracture gap on baseline (week 1) images and by automated registration of the follow-up images to the baseline co-ordinate system. RESULTS: The mean time to achieve radiologic union on CT was slightly shorter than on X-rays for radial and tibial shaft fractures (7.3 vs. 8.0 weeks, P = .1). Blurring of the fracture margins and reactive sclerosis were the earliest signs of healing in both modalities. External callus formation was evident in 11 cases and was detected earlier with CT technique. Overall, CT images allowed for more complete and detailed visualization of healing compared with conventional X-rays, which were limited by cast and fixation hardware superimposition, especially in subjects with malleolar and distal radial fractures. Quantitative evaluation showed good intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility and a statistically significant correlation to qualitative changes. CONCLUSION: Our methods of fracture healing assessment are reliable tools that are able to detect early changes in normal bone healing and may serve as useful additions to subjective image analysis in monitoring fracture healing in clinical trials. CT shows some advantages over conventional X-rays in evaluation of early fracture healing.
Assuntos
Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Fechadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The microbiological quality of ready-to-use (RTU) vegetables, including chopped lettuce, salad mix, carrot sticks, cauliflower florets, sliced celery, coleslaw mix, broccoli florets, and sliced green peppers was determined before and after processing. Microbial profiles were obtained 24 h after processing and on days 4, 7, and 11 after storage at 4 and 10°C to simulate temperature abuse. In addition, the microbial profiles of four RTU vegetables, coleslaw mix, salad mix, cauliflower florets, and sliced green peppers were determined 7 days after distribution to a select group of Ontario hospitals. RTU vegetables, with the exception of green peppers, showed up to a 1-log decrease in aerobic colony counts after processing. These counts increased to preprocessing levels after 4 days of storage at both 4 and 10°C. RTU vegetables stored at temperature abuse conditions (10°C)had significantly higher counts (P < 0.001) on days 4 to 11 as compared to those stored at 4°C. Green peppers had the highest bacterial counts while cauliflower and chopped lettuce had the lowest counts at both storage temperatures (P < 0.05). Increased levels of Listeria monocytogenes in RTU vegetables were associated with temperature abuse. Levels of >100 MPN/g for L. monocytogenes were detected in 8 of 120 (6.7%) samples stored at 10°C but not in 175 samples stored at 4°C after 7 days (P < 0.05). Overall, L. monocytogenes was detected in 13 of 120 (10.8%) RTU vegetables stored for up to 11 days at 10°C and 5 of 176 (2.8%) samples stored at 4°C (P < 0.05). E. coli was detected in 2 of the 120 (1.7%) processed RTU vegetables after day 7 of storage at 10°C and 1 of the 65 (1.5%) unprocessed vegetables from the same batches of vegetables used for processing. This indicator organism was not detected in RTU vegetable samples stored at 4°C or in any of the RTU vegetable samples obtained from hospital coolers. Other pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Yersinia enterocolitica (serotype O:3) and verocytotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) were not detected in any of the RTU vegetables tested, Recommendations regarding processing, distribution, and storage of these products are presented.