Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Nootrópicos/efeitos adversos , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Apoio SocialRESUMO
Memory Clinics provide evidence based diagnosis and treatment of dementia. Whenever a diagnosis of dementia is made, it is important to inform the patients about the possible impact of dementia on driving. Patients and their next of kin require competent advice whenever this difficult question is addressed and the mobility desire and the risks related to driving need to be carefully weight up. The time of diagnosis does not necessarily equate to the time when a person with dementia becomes an unsafe driver. The cause and severity of dementia, comorbidities and the current medication need to be carefully taken into account for this decision. On behalf of the association of the Swiss Memory Clinics, a group of experts has developed recommendations to assess fitness to drive in cognitively impaired older adults.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Condução de Veículo/legislação & jurisprudência , Condução de Veículo/psicologia , Demência/psicologia , Acidentes de Trânsito/legislação & jurisprudência , Idoso , Algoritmos , Demência/diagnóstico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Relações Médico-Paciente , Presbiopia/diagnóstico , Presbiopia/psicologia , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Medição de Risco , SuíçaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Valid assessment of apraxia in usually non-apraxic Parkinson's disease helps to delineate atypical parkinsonism frequently associated with apraxia. Furthermore, in a subgroup of late Parkinson's disease apraxia, typically the ideomotor subtype, may gradually superimpose onto parkinsonian motor symptoms contributing to defective manual skill. Here we evaluate the utility of a brief, standardized test, the apraxia screen of TULIA (AST). METHODS: Seventy five Parkinson's disease patients were tested with the AST. Parkinsonian motor deficits were measured using Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III and difficulties in activities of daily living (ADL) by modified MDS-UPDRS part II (eating, dressing, personal hygiene, and writing). RESULTS: No association was found between the AST and MDS-UPDRS part III, indicating that AST discriminates well (discriminative validity) between apraxia and parkinsonism. Furthermore, AST was associated with ADL and Hoehn & Yahr stage (convergent validity). CONCLUSIONS: AST is a short and valid test to rule out or detect apraxia in Parkinson's disease.
Assuntos
Apraxias/diagnóstico , Apraxias/etiologia , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Only few standardized apraxia scales are available and they do not cover all domains and semantic features of gesture production. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a newly developed test of upper limb apraxia (TULIA), which is comprehensive and still short to administer. METHODS: The TULIA consists of 48 items including imitation and pantomime domain of non-symbolic (meaningless), intransitive (communicative) and transitive (tool related) gestures corresponding to 6 subtests. A 6-point scoring method (0-5) was used (score range 0-240). Performance was assessed by blinded raters based on videos in 133 stroke patients, 84 with left hemisphere damage (LHD) and 49 with right hemisphere damage (RHD), as well as 50 healthy subjects (HS). RESULTS: The clinimetric findings demonstrated mostly good to excellent internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater (test-retest) reliability, both at the level of the six subtests and at individual item level. Criterion validity was evaluated by confirming hypotheses based on the literature. Construct validity was demonstrated by a high correlation (r = 0.82) with the De Renzi-test. CONCLUSION: These results show that the TULIA is both a reliable and valid test to systematically assess gesture production. The test can be easily applied and is therefore useful for both research purposes and clinical practice.