Targeted High-throughput Sequencing for Hematological Malignancies: A GBMHM Survey of Practice and Cost Evaluation in France.

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical impact and financial costs of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 5 categories of pediatric and adult hematological cancers. NGS prescriptions were prospectively collected from 26 laboratories, with varied technical and reporting practice (all or only significant targets). Impact was defined by the identification of (1) an actionable mutation, (2) a mutation with prognostic and/or theranostic value, and/or (3) a mutation allowing nosological refinement, reported by local investigators. A microcosting study was undertaken in 4 laboratories, identifying the types and volumes of resources required for each procedural step. Individual index prescriptions for 3961 patients were available for impact analysis on the management of myeloid disorders (two thirds) and, mainly mature B, lymphoid disorders (one third). NGS results were considered to impact the management for 73.4% of prescriptions: useful for evaluation of prognostic risk in 34.9% and necessary for treatment adaptation (actionable) in 19.6%, but having no immediate individual therapeutic impact in 18.9%. The average overall cost per sample was 191 € for the restricted mature lymphoid amplicon panel. Capture panel costs varied from 369 € to 513 €. Unit costs varied from 0.5 € to 5.7 € per kb sequenced, from 3.6 € to 11.3 € per target gene/hot-spot sequenced and from 4.3 € to 73.8 € per target gene/hot-spot reported. Comparable costs for the Amplicon panels were 5-8 € per kb and 10.5-14.7 € per target gene/hot-spot sequenced and reported, demonstrating comparable costs with greater informativity/flexibility for capture strategies. Sustainable funding of precision medicine requires a transparent discussion of its impact on care pathways and its financial aspects.

Propelling Health Care into the Twenties.

The scope and potential of personalised health care are underappreciated and underrealised, often because of resistance to change. The consequence is that many inadequacies of health care in Europe persist unnecessarily, and many opportunities for improvement are neglected. This article identifies the principal challenges, outlines possible approaches to resolving them, and highlights the benefits that could result from greater adoption of personalised health care. It locates the discussion in the context of European policy, focusing particularly on the most recent and authoritative reviews of health care in the EU Member States, and on the newly acquired spirit of readiness and pragmatism among European officials to embrace change and innovative technologies in a new decade. It highlights the attention now being given by policymakers to incentives, innovation, and investment as levers to improve European citizens' prospects in a rapidly evolving world, and how these distinct and disruptive themes contribute to a renaissance in thinking about delivering optimal health care in Europe. It explores the chances offered to patients by specific initiatives in health domains such as cancer and antimicrobial resistance, and by innovative science, novel therapies, earlier diagnosis tools, and deeper understanding of health promotion and prevention. And it reflects on how health care providers could benefit from a shift towards better primary care and towards deploying health data more effectively, including the use of artificial intelligence, coupled with a move to a smoother organisational/regulatory structure and realigned professional responsibilities. The conclusion is that preparing Europe's health care systems for the inevitable strains of the coming years is both possible and necessary. A more courageous approach to embracing personalised health care could guarantee the sustainability of Europe's health care systems before rising demands and exponential costs overwhelm them - an exercise in future-proofing, in ensuring that they are equipped to withstand whatever lies ahead. A focus on the potential and implementation of personalised care would permit more efficient use of resources and deliver better quality health-preserving care.

A New and Simple TRG Multiplex PCR Assay for Assessment of T-cell Clonality: A Comparative Study from the EuroClonality Consortium.

T-cell Receptor Gamma (TRG) rearrangements are commonly used to detect clonal lymphoproliferations in hematopathology, since they are rearranged in virtually all T lymphocytes and have a relatively limited recombinatorial repertoire, which reduces the risk of false negative results, at the cost of potential false positivity. We developed an initial one-tube, 2-fluorochrome EuroClonality TRG PCR multiplex (TRG-1T-2F) which was compared to the original 2-tube, 2-fluorochrome EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 TRG PCR (TRG-2T-2F) and a commercial Invivoscribe one-tube, one-fluorochrome kit (IVS-1T-1F) on a series of 239 samples, including both T-cell malignancies and reactive cases. This initial assay yielded discrepant results between the 10 participating EuroClonality laboratories when using 2 fluorochromes, leading to adoption of a final single color EuroClonality strategy (TRG-1T-1F). Compared to TRG-2T-2F, both TRG-1T-1F and IVS-1T-1F demonstrated easier interpretation and a lower risk of false positive from minor peaks in dispersed repertoires. Both generate smaller fragments and as such are likely to be better adapted to analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Their differential performance was mainly explained by (i) superposition of biallelic rearrangements with IVS-1T-1F, due to more extensive overlapping of the repertoires and (ii) intentional omission of the TRGJP primer in TRG-1T-1F, in order to avoid the potential risk of confusion of consensus TRG V9-JP normal rearrangements with a pathological clone.

Cartridge-based automated BCR-ABL1 mRNA quantification: solving the issues of standardization, at what cost?

BACKGROUND: Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is essential for therapeutic stratification. Inter-laboratory reproducibility is, therefore, a crucial issue which requires standardization and strict alignment of BCR-ABL1 values to the international scale. An automated cartridge-based assay (Xpert BCR-ABL Monitor(™), Cepheid) had been proposed as a robust alternative to non-automated assays. This study aimed to compare inter-laboratory reproducibility of automated and non-automated quantification, the possibility of converting automated results to the international scale, and the potential economic impact of automation. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and eighteen blood samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were prospectively analyzed in two laboratories using both automated and non-automated assays. The economic evaluation involved a micro-costing study and average costs were assessed as a function of sample throughput. RESULTS: Automated assays achieved similar inter-laboratory reproducibility to highly standardized non-automated assays and a short delay (≤6 h) between sampling and blood lysis had a positive impact on inter-laboratory reproducibility. Reporting automated BCR-ABL1 ratios on the international scale was possible using a specific conversion factor which may vary with batches. Cost assessment showed that automated assays could be relevant for annual activity levels below 300 since average costs were lower than those of the non-automated assays. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert BCR-ABL Monitor(™) assay could be appropriately used in a near-patient setting for routine quantification of e13/e14-a2 transcripts, preferably in partnership with a regional reference laboratory. However, its prognostic impact relative to non-automated quantification remains to be tested prospectively within appropriate clinical trials.