Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 6(5): e011457, 2016 05 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27225652

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In the general population, alcohol use disorder and depression more often occur together than any other combination of a mental illness with a substance use disorder. It is important to have a cost-effective intervention that is able to reach at-risk individuals in the early stages of developing alcohol use disorders and depression disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This paper presents the protocol for a 3-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the combined internet-based self-help intervention Take Care of You (TCOY) to reduce alcohol misuse and depression symptoms in comparison with a waiting list control group and a comparable intervention focusing on problematic alcohol use only. The active interventions consist of modules designed to reduce alcohol use, based on the principles of motivational interviewing and methods of cognitive behavioural therapy, together with additional modules in the combined study arm to reduce symptoms of depression. Data will be collected at baseline, as well as at 3 and 6 months postrandomisation. The primary outcome is the quantity of alcohol used in the past 7 days. A number of secondary outcome measures will be studied. These include the Centre of Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CES-D) and a combined measure with the criteria of values below the cut-off for severe alcohol use disorder and for CES-D. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle using (generalised) linear mixed models. In order to investigate the interventions' cost-utility and cost-effectiveness, a full economic evaluation will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This RCT will be executed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and has been approved by 2 local Ethics Committees. Results will be reported at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications. Participant-friendly summaries of trial findings will be published on the TCOY websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10323951.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo/prevenção & controle , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Internet , Prevenção Secundária/economia , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diagnóstico Duplo (Psiquiatria) , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Entrevista Motivacional , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Projetos de Pesquisa , Resultado do Tratamento , Interface Usuário-Computador
2.
PLoS One ; 10(12): e0144402, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26657300

RESUMO

Pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE) refers to the nonmedical use of prescription or recreational drugs to enhance cognitive performance. Several concerns about PCE have been raised in the public. The aim of the present study was to investigate students' attitudes toward PCE. Students at three Swiss universities were invited by e-mail to participate in a web-based survey. Of the 29,282 students who were contacted, 3,056 participated. Of these students, 22% indicated that they had used prescription drugs (12%) or recreational substances including alcohol (14%) at least once for PCE. The use of prescription drugs or recreational substances including alcohol prior to the last exam was reported by 16%. Users of pharmacological cognitive enhancers were more likely to consider PCE fair (24%) compared with nonusers (11%). Only a minority of the participants agreed with the nonmedical use of prescription drugs by fellow students when assuming weak (7%) or hypothetically strong efficacy and availability to everyone (14%). Two-thirds (68%) considered performance that is obtained with PCE less worthy of recognition. Additionally, 80% disagreed that PCE is acceptable in a competitive environment. More than half (64%) agreed that PCE in academia is similar to doping in sports. Nearly half (48%) claimed that unregulated access to pharmacological cognitive enhancers increases the pressure to engage in PCE and educational inequality (55%). In conclusion, Swiss students' main concerns regarding PCE were related to coercion and fairness. As expected, these concerns were more prevalent among nonusers than among users of pharmacological cognitive enhancers. More balanced information on PCE should be shared with students, and future monitoring of PCE is recommended.


Assuntos
Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Nootrópicos/farmacologia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/farmacologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Correio Eletrônico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Estudantes/psicologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suíça , Universidades , Adulto Jovem
3.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 156: 221-227, 2015 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26455555

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between stress, self-efficacy, self-medication, and pharmacological neuroenhancement (PNE) in the Swiss general population. METHODS: Using the largest Swiss Internet panel, a sample of 10,171 employees and students (unweighted N=10,084) aged 15-74 years was recruited and asked to complete a self-administered online survey. The data were weighted for age, sex, and language region to provide results that were representative of the Swiss population. Multinomial logistic regression models were conducted to identify predictors of pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE) and pharmacological mood enhancement (PME) over the past year. Two self-medication models and an overall model were determined. RESULTS: Current medical treatment for a mental disorder was the best predictor of both PCE and PME use as serious self-medication. The overall model revealed that cannabis use, frequent stress, and long-term stress were predictors of both PCE and PME, whereas negative stressors and time pressure at work did not remain in the final model. Furthermore, past-year PCE with and without PME was associated with being male, being a student, and using illegal drugs other than cannabis, whereas being female and having low self-efficacy predicted past-year PME only. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of the predictor variables identified in this study may help to identify the potential PCE and PME users for whom measures to prevent drug abuse and manage stress are most appropriate. More specifically, the use of PCE and PME as self-medication to enhance performance at work or while studying needs further consideration in the neuroenhancement debate.


Assuntos
Nootrópicos , Autoeficácia , Automedicação/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Afeto/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Idioma , Masculino , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estudantes , Suíça/epidemiologia , Trabalho , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA