Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Ther ; 12(10): 2367-2386, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37755671

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A favorable benefit-risk balance is required to support licensure of biologics, in keeping with regulatory agencies' evolving recommendations, including the United States Food and Drugs Administration. We present a structured semi-quantitative benefit-risk analysis of MenACYW-TT, a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine against Neisseria meningitidis serogroups, A, C, W and Y versus licensed comparators in individuals aged ≥ 12 months. METHODS: We used data from six MenACYW-TT clinical trials, stratified by age group, versus licensed vaccines: toddlers (12-23 months; Nimenrix® [MCV4-TT]), children (2-9 years; Menveo® [MCV4-CRM]), adolescents (10-17 years; MCV4-CRM or Menactra® [MCV4-DT]), adults (18-55 years; MCV4-DT) and older adults (≥ 56 years; Menomune®-A/C/Y/W-135 [MPSV4]). Eight benefit (seroresponse and seroprotection for A, C, W and Y) and five risk outcomes (any and grade 3 solicited injection site and systemic reactions, and serious adverse events) were measured at Day 30 after initial vaccination. Analyses were conducted by baseline vaccination status (meningococcal vaccine-naïve or vaccine-primed). RESULTS: MenACYW-TT showed favorable seroresponse and seroprotection among vaccine-naïve participants aged ≥ 2 years, against all serogroups, compared with MCV4-CRM, MCV4-DT and MPSV4. In vaccine-naïve toddlers, there was a favorable effect for serogroup C, but no difference between MenACYW-TT and MCV4-TT for serogroups A, Y and W. A favorable effect for MenACYW-TT against serogroup C was observed in all vaccine-naïve and combined vaccine-naïve and MenC conjugate vaccine-primed groups. For all risk criteria, there were no differences between MenACYW-TT and MCV4s in toddlers, children, adolescents and adults. Results for solicited injection site and systemic reactions favored MPSV4 in older adults. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit-risk profile for MenACYW-TT showed favorable seroresponse and seroprotection in individuals aged ≥ 2 years and no difference in risk criteria between MenACYW-TT and MCV4s. MenACYW-TT may provide an alternative to the standard-of-care for meningococcal disease prevention in those aged ≥ 12 months.

2.
Vaccine ; 38(49): 7702-7707, 2020 11 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33070999

RESUMO

Several live-attenuated viral vaccine candidates are among the COVID-19 vaccines in development. The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) has prepared a standardized template to describe the key considerations for the benefit-risk assessment of live-attenuated viral vaccines. This will help key stakeholders assess potential safety issues and understand the benefit-risk of such vaccines. The standardized and structured assessment provided by the template would also help to contribute to improved communication and support public acceptance of licensed live-attenuated viral vaccines.


Assuntos
Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/normas , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/farmacologia , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Sociedades Científicas , Vacinas Atenuadas/farmacologia , Vacinas Virais/farmacologia
3.
Vaccine ; 38(39): 6184-6189, 2020 09 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32747214

RESUMO

Inactivated viral vaccines have long been used in humans for diseases of global health threat and are now among the vaccines for COVID-19 under development. The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) has prepared a standardized template to describe the key considerations for the benefit-risk assessment of inactivated viral vaccines. This will help key stakeholders to assess potential safety issues and understand the benefit-risk of the vaccine platform. The standardized and structured assessment provided by the template would also help to contribute to improved communication and support public acceptance of licensed inactivated viral vaccines.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Vacinas Virais/normas , Betacoronavirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Defesa Civil , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Cooperação Internacional , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Virais/biossíntese
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA