Multicentre positive deviance to reduce adverse events and length of stay after pulmonary resection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adverse events (AEs) following pulmonary resection enormously impact patient well-being, length of stay (LOS) and healthcare costs. Standardised AE data collection can be used to identify positive outliers demonstrating positive deviance (PD) who may be helpful to inform the best practice. Here, we describe our initial experience of a novel quality improvement process using PD to reduce LOS and AEs. METHODS: AE rates and LOS were collected from four centres (2014-2020) using a common dictionary. Surgeons repeatedly participated in 60 to 90 min seminars consisting of the following process: identify outcome and procedure targeted, review relevant best evidence literature, view all data anonymised by surgeon or centre (if multicentre), choose and reveal identity of best performance PD outliers, who discuss their management principles while all receive self-evaluation reports, followed by collegial discussion to generate consensus recommendations, voted by all. We assessed overall impact on AEs and LOS using aggregate data in a before/after analysis. RESULTS: A total of 131 surgeons (average 12/seminar) participated in 11 PD seminars (8 local and 3 multicentre), yielding 85 consensus recommendation (average 8/seminar). Median LOS following lobectomy decreased from 4.0 to 3.0 days (p=0.04) following local PD seminars and from 4.0 to 3.5 days (p=0.11) following multicentre seminars. Trends for reductions in multiple AE rates were also observed. CONCLUSION: While limited by the longitudinal design, these findings provide preliminary support for this data-driven, collegial and actionable quality improvement process to help standardise and improve patient care, and merits further more rigorous investigation.

Assessment of tumour response after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for lung cancer: A prospective quantitative hybrid 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and CT perfusion study.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a guideline-recommended treatment for inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but imaging assessment of response after SABR is difficult. The goal of this study was to evaluate imaging-based biomarkers of tumour response using dynamic 18 F-FDG-PET and CT perfusion (CTP). METHODS: Thirty-one patients with early-stage NSCLC participated in this prospective correlative study. Each underwent dynamic 18 F-FDG-PET/CTP studies on a PET/CT scanner pre- and 8 weeks post-SABR. The dynamic 18 F-FDG-PET measured the tumour SUVmax , SUVmean and the following parameters: K1 , k2 , k3 , k4 and Ki , all using the Johnson-Wilson-Lee kinetic model. CTP quantitatively mapped BF, BV, MTT and PS in tumours and measured largest tumour diameter. Since free-breathing was allowed during CTP scanning, non-rigid image registration of CT images was applied to minimize misregistration before generating the CTP functional maps. Differences between pre- and post-SABR imaging-based parameters were compared. RESULTS: Tumour size changed only slightly after SABR (median 26 mm pre-SABR vs. 23 mm post-SABR; P = 0.01). However, dynamic 18 F-FDG-PET and CTP study showed substantial and significant changes in SUVmax , SUVmean , k3 , k4 and Ki . Significant decreases were evident in SUVmax (median 6.1 vs. 2.6; P < 0.001), SUVmean (median 2.5 vs. 1.5; P < 0.001), k3 (relative decrease of 52%; P = 0.002), Ki (relative decrease of 27%; P = 0.03), whereas there was an increase in k4 (+367%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid 18 F-FDG-PET/CTP allowed the response of NSCLC to SABR to be assessed regarding metabolic and functional parameters. Future studies are needed, with correlation with long-term outcomes, to evaluate these findings as potential imaging biomarkers of response.

Development of an In Situ Thoracic Surgery Crisis Simulation Focused on Nontechnical Skill Training.

BACKGROUND: Our vision was to develop an inexpensive training simulation in a functional operating room (in situ) that included surgical trainees and nursing and anesthesia staff to focus on effective interprofessional communication and teamwork skills. METHODS: The simulation scenario revolved around an airway obstruction by residual tumor after pneumonectomy. This model included our thoracic operating room with patient status displayed by an open access vital sign simulator and a reversibly modified Laerdal airway mannequin (Shavanger, Norway). The simulation scenario was run seven times. Simulations were video recorded and scored with the use of Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and TeamSTEPPS2. Latent safety threats (LSTs) and feedback were obtained during the debriefing after the simulation. Feedback was captured with the Method Material Member Overall (MMMO) questionnaire. RESULTS: Several LSTs were identified, which included missing and redundant equipment and knowledge gaps in participants' roles. Consultant surgeons received a higher overall score than thoracic surgery fellows on both NOTSS (3.8 versus 3.3) and TeamSTEPPS2 (4.1 versus 3.2) evaluations, suggesting that the scenario effectively differentiated learners from experts with regards to nontechnical skills. The MMMO overall simulation experience score was 4.7 of 5, confirming a high-fidelity model and useful experiential learning model. At the Canadian Thoracic Bootcamp, the MMMO overall experience score was 4.8 of 5, further supporting this simulation as a robust model. CONCLUSIONS: An inexpensive in situ intraoperative crisis simulation model for thoracic surgical emergencies was created, implemented, and demonstrated to be effective as a proof of concept at identifying latent threats to patient safety and differentiating the nontechnical skills of trainees and consultant surgeons.

Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery.

BACKGROUND: The loss of haptic information that results from the reduced-access conditions present in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) may compromise the safety of the procedures. This limitation must be overcome through training. However, current methods for determining the skill level of trainees do not measure critical elements of skill attainment. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of force information for the assessment of skill during MIS. METHODS: To achieve the study goal, experiments were performed using a set of sensorized instruments capable of measuring instrument position and tissue interaction forces. Several force-based metrics were developed as well as metrics that combine force and position information. RESULTS: The results show that experience level has a strong correlation with the new force-based metrics presented in this article. In particular, the integral and the derivative of the forces or the metrics that combine force and position provide the strongest correlations. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that force-based metrics are better indications of performance than metrics based on task completion time or position information alone. The proposed metrics can be automatically computed, are completely objective, and measure important aspects of performance.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgery for medically operable Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a Markov model-based decision analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality-adjusted life expectancy and overall survival in patients with Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We constructed a Markov model to describe health states after either SBRT or lobectomy for Stage I NSCLC for a 5-year time frame. We report various treatment strategy survival outcomes stratified by age, sex, and pack-year history of smoking, and compared these with an external outcome prediction tool (Adjuvant! Online). RESULTS: Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and other causes of death as predicted by our model correlated closely with those predicted by the external prediction tool. Overall survival at 5 years as predicted by baseline analysis of our model is in favor of surgery, with a benefit ranging from 2.2% to 3.0% for all cohorts. Mean quality-adjusted life expectancy ranged from 3.28 to 3.78 years after surgery and from 3.35 to 3.87 years for SBRT. The utility threshold for preferring SBRT over surgery was 0.90. Outcomes were sensitive to quality of life, the proportion of local and regional recurrences treated with standard vs. palliative treatments, and the surgery- and SBRT-related mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: The role of SBRT in the medically operable patient is yet to be defined. Our model indicates that SBRT may offer comparable overall survival and quality-adjusted life expectancy as compared with surgical resection. Well-powered prospective studies comparing surgery vs. SBRT in early-stage lung cancer are warranted to further investigate the relative survival, quality of life, and cost characteristics of both treatment paradigms.

The cost of laparoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation for esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: The two main treatment options for esophageal achalasia are laparoscopic distal esophageal myotomy (LM) and pneumatic dilatation (PD). Our objective was to compare the costs of these management strategies. METHODS: We constructed a decision analytic model consisting of two treatment strategies for patients diagnosed with achalasia. Probabilities of events were systematically derived from a literature review, supplemented by expert opinion when necessary. Costs were estimated from the perspective of a third-party payer and society, including both direct and indirect costs. Future costs were discounted at a rate of 5.5% over a time horizon of 5 and 10 years. Uncertainty in the probability estimates was incorporated using probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We tested uncertainty in the model by modifying key assumptions and repeating the analysis. RESULTS: From the societal perspective, the expected cost per patient was $10,789 (LM) compared with $5,315 (PD) five years following diagnosis, and $11,804 (LM) compared with $7,717 (PD) after 10 years. The 95% confidence interval of the incremental cost per patient treated with LM was ($5,280, $5,668) after five years, and ($3,863, $4,311) after 10 years. The incremental cost of LM was similar from the third-party payer perspective and in the secondary model analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Initial LM is a more costly management strategy under all clinically plausible scenarios tested in this model. Further research is needed to determine patients' preferences for the two treatment modalities, and society's willingness to bear the incremental cost of LM for those who choose it.

A randomized clinical trial of lung volume reduction surgery versus best medical care for patients with advanced emphysema: a two-year study from Canada.

BACKGROUND: We present a summary report evaluating the efficacy of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in patients with advanced emphysema in the Canadian setting. METHODS: Quality of Life measures assessed the efficacy of adding LVRS to best medical care including rehabilitation in this blinded randomized multicentered controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Health utility and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were outcomes central to our economic assessment. RESULTS: None of the 32 patients randomized to the LVRS arm or 30 patients in the best medical care (BMC) arm crossed-over and no patients were lost to follow-up. Overall surgical mortality was 16% at 2 years while the overall medical mortality was 13% (p = 0.914). There were no 30-day postoperative deaths but 2 deaths (6%) occurred within 90 days of randomization. Surgery reduced the residual volume measured at 6 months by 23% (5,385 mL to 4,322 mL, p = 0.007). There was an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 30% (265 mL, p = 0.013) from baseline, an improvement in the six minute walk test (6MWT) of 78 meters (p = 0.045), and an increase in Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3) which peaked at 6 months with a difference of 0.16 (p = 0.129). There was a gain in QALYs of 0.21 (p = 0.19) in the LVRS-arm over the BMC-arm. The LVRS costs an additional 28,119 Canadian dollars (CAD) compared with BMC or 133,900 CAD/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of LVRS to best medical care including pulmonary rehabilitation improves pulmonary function, exercise activity, and quality of life in selected patients with advanced emphysema. Cost is high but in keeping with other treatment modalities currently available.