Mitral annular calcification in the elderly - Quantitative assessment.

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of subjective and objective quantification of mitral annular calcification (MAC) in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis, to define quantitative sex- and age-related reference values of MAC, and to correlate quantitative MAC with mitral valve disease. METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB-approved study, we included 559 patients (268 females, median age 81 years, inter-quartile range 77-85 years) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing CT. Four independent readers performed subjective MAC categorization as follows: no, mild, moderate, and severe MAC. Two independent readers performed quantitative evaluation of MAC using the Agatston score method (AgatstonMAC). Mitral valve disease was determined by echocardiography. RESULTS: Subjective MAC categorization showed high inter-reader agreement for no (k â€‹= â€‹0.88) and severe MAC (k â€‹= â€‹0.75), whereas agreement for moderate (k â€‹= â€‹0.59) and mild (k â€‹= â€‹0.45) MAC was moderate. Intra-reader agreement for subjective MAC categorization was substantial (k â€‹= â€‹0.69 and 0.62). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for AgatstonMAC were excellent (ICC â€‹= â€‹0.998 and 0.999, respectively), with minor inconsistencies in MAC involving the left ventricular outflow tract/aortic valve. There were significantly more women than men with MAC (n â€‹= â€‹227, 85% versus n â€‹= â€‹209, 72%; p â€‹< â€‹0.001), with a significantly higher AgatstonMAC (median 597, range 81-2055 versus median 244; range 0-1565; p â€‹< â€‹0.001), particularly in patients ≥85 years of age. AgatstonMAC showed an area-under-the-curve of 0.84 to diagnose mitral stenosis, whereas there was no association of AgatstonMAC with mitral regurgitation (p â€‹> â€‹0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis shows that quantitative MAC scoring is more reliable than subjective MAC assessment. Women show higher AgatstonMAC scores than men, particularly in the elderly population. AgatstonMAC shows high accuracy to diagnose mitral stenosis.

Value of additional myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of intermediate coronary artery disease.

This study was performed to assess the role of additional myocardial perfusion imaging during high dose dobutamine/atropine stress magnetic resonance (DSMR-wall motion) for the evaluation of patients with intermediate (50-70%) coronary artery stenosis. Routine DSMR-wall motion was combined with perfusion imaging (DSMR-perfusion) in 174 consecutive patients with chest pain syndromes who were scheduled for a clinically indicated coronary angiography. When defining CAD as the presence of a ≥ 50% stenosis, the addition of perfusion imaging improved sensitivity (90 vs. 79%, P < 0.001) with a non-significant reduction in specificity (85 vs. 90%, P = 0.13) and an improvement in overall diagnostic accuracy (88 vs. 84%, P = 0.008). Adding perfusion imaging improved sensitivity in patients with intermediate stenosis (87 vs. 72%, P = 0.03), but not in patients with severe (≥70%) stenosis (93 vs. 84%, P = 0.06). In patients with severe stenosis specificity of DSMR-perfusion versus DSMR-wall motion decreased (61 vs 70%, P = 0.001) resulting in a lower overall accuracy (71 vs 74%, P = 0.03). Using a cutoff of ≥50% for the definition of CAD, sensitivity of DSMR-perfusion compared to DSMR-wall motion was significantly higher in patients with single vessel (88 vs. 77%, P = 0.03) and multi vessel disease (93 vs. 79%, P = 0.03), whereas no significant differences were found using a cutoff of ≥70% stenosis for the definition of CAD. The addition of perfusion imaging during DSMR-wall motion improved the sensitivity in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Overall diagnostic accuracy increased only when defining CAD as ≥50% stenosis. In patients with ≥70% stenosis DSMR-wall motion alone had higher accuracy due to more false-positive cases with DSMR-perfusion.