Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536029

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Alongside health consequences, cesarean delivery (CD) has been associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). A CD should be performed in case of placenta previa; in turn, the most appropriate mode of birth in women with a low-lying placenta (LLP) is still controversial. Since no previous data are available on the topic, the aim of this study was to evaluate the HCRU and economic impact on the Italian HC system of vaginal birth (VB) and CD in women with a LLP. METHODS: This retrospective study used patient-level real-world data of a cohort of women with a LLP confirmed at 28-30 weeks. A cost-minimization analysis (CMA) was conducted to compare VB and CD. Since Diagnosis-Related-Group payment may not reflect the actual use of hospital resources, a micro-costing analysis (MCA) was performed to more comprehensively evaluate the economic impact of VB and CD. RESULTS: The study included 86 women with a LLP at the third trimester scan, of which 49 (57%) had a VB and 37 (43%) underwent a CD. The CMA showed an economically marginal difference between VB and CD, especially when considering opportunity costs associated with the resources needed to look after women. However, the MCA identified charges for each VB being about half of those for each CD. CONCLUSIONS: The use of patient-level real-world data allowed to generate basic information to assess the value of available interventions in case of LLP. A VB should be promoted in women with LLP, avoiding further burden on the HC system's limited resources.

2.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 75(5): 1046-1051, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and tight control improve outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, whether establishing an early arthritis clinic (EAC) is sustainable for national health systems is not known. This analysis aimed to compare effectiveness and costs of an EAC compared to patients followed by the current standard of care. METHODS: A retrospective study on administrative health databases of patients with a new diagnosis of RA was conducted: 430 patients followed in an EAC were enrolled, and 4 non-EAC controls were randomly matched for each. During 2 years of follow-up, the mean health care costs (outpatient, inpatient, pharmaceutical, and global) and 3 effectiveness measures (number and length of hospitalization and quality of care) of the EAC and non-EAC were estimated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as well as the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. RESULTS: The cohorts included patients with a mean age of 55.4 years, and 1,506 patients (70%) were female. The mean pharmaceutical (2,602 versus 1,945 euros) and outpatient (2,447 versus 1,778 euros) costs were higher in the EAC cohort. Conversely, a higher rate of non-EAC patients had a low adherence to quality-of-care indicators. The expected number of hospitalizations and the length of stay were statistically significantly higher in the non-EAC versus EAC. CONCLUSION: Despite an expected increase in outpatient costs (visits and diagnostic tests) and pharmaceutical costs, the reduction in terms of number and length of hospitalizations and the higher adherence to international quality-of-care guidelines support the effectiveness of the EAC model.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Modelos Organizacionais , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Preparações Farmacêuticas
3.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254631, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252164

RESUMO

Hypercholesterolemia is a clinically relevant condition with an ascertained role in atherogenesis. In particular, its presence directly correlates to the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As known, cardiovascular diseases pose a significant economic burden worldwide; however, a clear picture of the economic impact of ASCVD secondary to hypercholesterolemia is lacking. This study aiming at conducting a systematic review of the current literature to assess the economic impact of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), non-familial hypercholesterolemia (non-FH) or mixed dyslipidemia. A literature search was performed in Medline/PubMed and Embase database up to September 1st, 2020, exploring evidence published from 2010. The literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. To be included the studies must be conducted on people who have been diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia, non-familial hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia, and report data/information on costs attributable to these conditions and their sequelae. A total of 1260 studies were retrieved. After reading the titles and abstract, 103 studies were selected for full reading and eight met the criteria for inclusion. All but one studies were published in the American continent, with the majority conducted in US. An observational design with a prevalence approach were used and all estimated the economic burden of CVD. Direct cost estimates as annual average health expenditure on all population, ranging from $17 to $259 million. Few studies assessing the economic impact of hypercholesterolemia are available in the literature and new researches are needed to provide a more updated and reliable picture. Despite this scarceness of evidence, this review adds important data for future discussion on the knowledge of the economic impact of hypercholesterolemia and costs of care associated to this condition, with important implication for public health researches and novel therapies implementation.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dislipidemias/economia , Hipercolesterolemia/economia , Humanos , Saúde Pública/economia
4.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 28(4): 385-396, 2021 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966080

RESUMO

AIMS: An exhaustive and updated estimation of cardiovascular disease burden and vascular risk factors is still lacking in European countries. This study aims to fill this gap assessing the global Italian cardiovascular disease burden and its changes from 1990 to 2017 and comparing the Italian situation with European countries. METHODS: All accessible data sources from the 2017 Global Burden of Disease study were used to estimate the cardiovascular disease prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years and cardiovascular disease attributable risk factors burden in Italy from 1990 to 2017. Furthermore, we compared the cardiovascular disease burden within the 28 European Union countries. RESULTS: Since 1990, we observed a significant decrease of cardiovascular disease burden, particularly in the age-standardised prevalence (-12.7%), mortality rate (-53.8%), and disability-adjusted life years rate (-55.5%). Similar improvements were observed in the majority of European countries. However, we found an increase in all-ages prevalence of cardiovascular diseases from 5.75 m to 7.49 m Italian residents. Cardiovascular diseases still remain the first cause of death (34.8% of total mortality). More than 80% of the cardiovascular disease burden could be attributed to known modifiable risk factors such as high systolic blood pressure, dietary risks, high low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and impaired kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a decline in cardiovascular mortality and disability-adjusted life years, which reflects the success in reducing disability, premature death and early incidence of cardiovascular diseases. However, the burden of cardiovascular diseases is still high. An approach that includes the cooperation and coordination of all stakeholders of the Italian National Health System is required to further reduce this burden.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Deficiência , Carga Global da Doença , Saúde Global , Humanos , Prevalência , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco
5.
Clin Drug Investig ; 41(5): 459-468, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily) with aspirin alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and related subgroups. METHODS: The analysis simulates the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service and used a state-transition decision Markov model. Clinical efficacy data and health events risks were gathered from the COMPASS trial. Health outcomes and costs (in Euros) were evaluated over a lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Direct healthcare costs entered the analysis. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the CAD or PAD population, rivaroxaban plus aspirin was more effective and costly compared with aspirin alone. Incremental costs and efficacy produced an ICER of €16,522 per QALY gained. Analyses found similar trends for the PAD and CAD groups, with respective ICERs of €8003 and €18,599, while ICERs for the other groups were lower than €13,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Compared with aspirin alone, rivaroxaban plus aspirin is cost effective in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in all patients with CAD or PAD, from the Italian perspective. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention.


Assuntos
Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Arterial Periférica/tratamento farmacológico , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Thromb Haemost ; 121(2): 206-215, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32877956

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagulation convenience attributes. METHODS: Adult patients with cancer-associated VTE who switched to direct oral anticoagulants were included in a single-arm study (COSIMO). Patients were asked to decide between hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of the following attributes: route of administration (injection/tablet), frequency of intake (once/twice daily), need for regular controls of the international normalized ratio (INR) at least every 3 to 4 weeks (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), and distance to treating physician (1 vs. 20 km) as an additional neutral attribute. DCE data were collected by structured telephone interviews and analyzed based on a conditional logit regression. RESULTS: Overall, 163 patients (mean age 63.7 years, 49.1% female) were included. They strongly preferred oral administration compared with self-injections (importance of this attribute for overall treatment decisions: 73.8%), and a treatment without dietary restrictions (11.8%). Even if these attributes were less important (7.2% and 6.5%, respectively), patients indicated a preference for a shorter distance to the treating physician and once-daily dosing compared with twice-daily intake. "Need for regular controls of INR at least every 3 to 4 weeks" showed no significant impact on the treatment decision (0.7%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that treatment-related decision making in cancer-associated VTE, assuming comparable effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant treatments, is predominantly driven by "route of administration," with patients strongly preferring oral administration.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(10): e2022886, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112399

RESUMO

Importance: Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported to have a higher risk of thrombosis and major bleeding complications compared with patients without concomitant CKD. The use of anticoagulation therapy is challenging, as many anticoagulant medications are excreted by the kidney. Large-scale data are needed to clarify the impact of CKD for anticoagulant treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of patients with VTE. Objective: To compare clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and 12-month outcomes among patients with VTE and concomitant moderate to severe CKD (stages 3-5) vs patients with VTE and mild to no CKD (stages 1-2) in a contemporary international registry. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Venous Thromboembolism (GARFIELD-VTE) study is a prospective noninterventional investigation of real-world treatment practices. A total of 10 684 patients from 415 sites in 28 countries were enrolled in the GARFIELD-VTE between May 2014 and January 2017. This cohort study included 8979 patients (6924 patients with mild to no CKD and 2055 patients with moderate to severe CKD) who had objectively confirmed VTE within 30 days before entry in the registry. Chronic kidney disease stages were defined by estimated glomerular filtration rates. Data were extracted from the study database on December 8, 2018, and analyzed between May 1, 2019, and July 30, 2020. Exposure: Moderate to severe CKD vs mild to no CKD. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE, and major bleeding. Event rates and 95% CIs were calculated and expressed per 100 person-years. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression models and adjusted for relevant confounding variables. All-cause mortality was considered a competing risk for other clinical outcomes in the estimation of cumulative incidences. Results: Of the 10 684 patients with objectively confirmed VTE, serum creatinine data were available for 8979 patients (84.0%). Of those, 4432 patients (49.4%) were female and 5912 patients (65.8%) were White; 6924 patients (77.1%; median age, 57 years; interquartile range [IQR], 44-69 years) were classified as having mild to no CKD, and 2055 patients (22.9%; median age, 70 years; IQR, 59-78 years) were classified as having moderate to severe CKD. Calculations using the equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study indicated that, among the 6924 patients with mild to no CKD, 2991 patients had stage 1 CKD, and 3933 patients had stage 2 CKD; among the 2055 patients with moderate to severe CKD, 1650 patients had stage 3 CKD, 190 patients had stage 4 CKD, and 215 patients had stage 5 CKD. The distribution of VTE presentation was comparable between groups. In total, 1171 patients (57.0%) with moderate to severe CKD and 4079 patients (58.9%) with mild to no CKD presented with deep vein thrombosis alone, 547 patients (26.6%) with moderate to severe CKD and 1723 patients (24.9%) with mild to no CKD presented with pulmonary embolism alone, and 337 patients (16.4%) with moderate to severe CKD and 1122 patients (16.2%) with mild to no CKD presented with both pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Compared with patients with mild to no CKD, patients with moderate to severe CKD were more likely to be female (3259 women [47.1%] vs 1173 women [57.1%]) and older than 65 years (2313 patients [33.4%] vs 1278 patients [62.2%]). At baseline, the receipt of parenteral therapy alone was comparable between the 2 groups (355 patients [17.3%] with moderate to severe CKD vs 1253 patients [18.1%] with mild to no CKD). Patients with moderate to severe CKD compared with those with mild to no CKD were less likely to be receiving direct oral anticoagulant therapy, either alone (557 patients [27.1%] vs 2139 patients [30.9%]) or in combination with parenteral therapy (319 patients [15.5%] vs 1239 patients [17.9%]). Patients with moderate to severe CKD had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.21-1.73), major bleeding (aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.90), and recurrent VTE (aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.77) than patients with mild to no CKD. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of patients with VTE, the presence of moderate to severe CKD was associated with increases in the risk of death, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding compared with the presence of mild to no CKD.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Correlação de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/fisiopatologia
8.
Int J Cardiol ; 319: 85-93, 2020 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32634487

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This review assessed global health technology assessment (HTA) reports and recommendations of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS: NHTA agency websites were searched for HTA reports evaluating NOACs versus NOACs or vitamin K antagonists. HTA methods and information on patient involvement/access were collected and empirically analyzed. RESULTS: The review identified 38 unique HTA reports published between 2012 and 2017 in 16 countries including 11 in Europe. NOACs that were cost-effective per local willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were positively recommended for the treatment of NVAF. WTP thresholds ranged from €20,000 to 69,000. Apixaban was recommended in 10/12 (83%) countries, dabigatran in 9/13 (69%) countries, and rivaroxaban in 10/13 (76%) over warfarin. Edoxaban was recommended in 5/7 (71%) countries. Economic evaluations and recommendations comparing NOACs were sparse (two or three countries per NOAC) and generally favored apixaban and edoxaban, followed by dabigatran. Eleven HTA reports from four countries considered the patient voice (Canada [n = 3], Scotland [n = 3], England [n = 4], Brazil [n = 1]); however, only 2/11 (18%) developed recommendations based on this. Among the reports with a positive recommendation, 26/30 (87%) featured a decision that aligned with the approved regulatory label. CONCLUSIONS: Most agencies recommended NOACs over warfarin for patients with NVAF. Few countries made statements recommending one NOAC over another. Given different WTP thresholds, a drug that is cost-effective in one market may not be in another. Therefore, the various NOAC recommendations from HTA agencies cannot be generalized across different countries.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica
9.
Clin Drug Investig ; 40(4): 319-326, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32130684

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly symptomatic disease, with a wide range of disabilities affecting many bodily functions, even in younger persons with a short disease history. The availability of a cannabinoid oromucosal spray (Sativex) for the management of treatment-resistant MS spasticity has provided a new opportunity for many patients. OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of Sativex in Italian patients with treatment-resistant MS spasticity. The analysis was based on the real-world data of a large registry of Italian patients. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted using data collected prospectively from an electronic registry of all patients who began to use Sativex for MS-resistant spasticity between January 2014 and February 2015 in 30 specialized MS units across Italy and were followed up for ≤ 6 months. Data on drug consumption and spasticity/utility were used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Sativex, as compared with no intervention. No costs or spasticity/utility changes were assumed for no treatment intervention. The ICER was expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, using the Italian NHS perspective and a 6-month time horizon. RESULTS: Sativex effectiveness and consumption was estimated analyzing data of 1350 patients from the registry. These patients reported a mean (SD) utility increment of 0.087 (0.069) after 1 month of treatment, 0.118 (0.073) after 3 months' treatment and 0.127 (0.080) after 6 months' treatment. The 6-month cost of treating the entire population with Sativex was €1,361,266, with a €1008 cost and 0.0284 QALYs gained per patient. The estimated ICER was €35,516 per QALY gained, with little variability around the central estimate of cost-effectiveness, as shown by the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. CONCLUSION: The use of Sativex could improve the quality of life of patients with a reasonable incremental cost resulting as a cost-effective option for patients with MS-resistant spasticity. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved management strategies for spasticity in patients with MS, optimizing the use of available resources.


Assuntos
Canabidiol/administração & dosagem , Dronabinol/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Espasticidade Muscular/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
10.
Liver Int ; 40(1): 60-73, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654608

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) are major health problems that require complex and costly treatments. Liver-specific clinical outcome indicators (COIs) able to assist both clinicians and administrators in improving the value of care are presently lacking. The Value-Based Medicine in Hepatology (VBMH) study aims to fill this gap, devising and testing a set of COIs for CLD, that could be easily collected during clinical practice. Here we report the COIs generated and recorded for patients with HBV or HCV infection at different stages of the disease. METHODS/RESULTS: In the first phase of VBMH study, COIs were identified, based on current international guidelines and literature, using a modified Delphi method and a RAND 9-point appropriateness scale. In the second phase, COIs were tested in an observational, longitudinal, prospective, multicentre study based in Lombardy, Italy. Eighteen COIs were identified for HBV and HCV patients. Patients with CLD secondary to HBV (547) or HCV (1391) were enrolled over an 18-month period and followed for a median of 4 years. The estimation of the proposed COIs was feasible in the real-word clinical practice and COI values compared well with literature data. Further, the COIs were able to capture the impact of new effective treatments like direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in the clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The COIs efficiently measured clinical outcomes at different stages of CLDs. While specific clinical practice settings and related healthcare systems may modify their implementation, these indicators will represent an important component of the tools for a value-based approach in hepatology and will positively affect care delivery.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gastroenterologia/normas , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Seguro de Saúde Baseado em Valor
11.
Eur J Haematol ; 101(4): 435-456, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29889317

RESUMO

Hemophilia is associated with a high financial burden on individuals, healthcare systems, and society. The development of inhibitors significantly increases the socioeconomic burden of the diseases. This study aimed to review and describe the burden of hemophilia with inhibitors, providing a reference scenario to assess the impact of new products in the real word. Two systematic literature reviews were performed to collect data on (i) health economics and (ii) health-related quality of life evidences in hemophilic patients with inhibitors. The costs associated with patients with hemophilia and inhibitors are more than 3 times greater than the costs incurred in those without inhibitors, with an annual cost per patient that can be higher than €1 000 000. The costs of bypassing agents account for the large majority of the total healthcare direct costs for hemophilia treatment. The quality of life is more compromised in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors compared to those without inhibitors, in particular the physical domains, whereas mental domains were comparable to that of the general population. The development of an inhibitor has a high impact on costs and quality of life. New treatments have the potential to change positively the management and socioeconomic burden of hemophilia with inhibitors.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hemofilia A/epidemiologia , Hemofilia B/epidemiologia , Coagulação Sanguínea , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hemofilia A/sangue , Hemofilia A/imunologia , Hemofilia A/terapia , Hemofilia B/sangue , Hemofilia B/imunologia , Hemofilia B/terapia , Humanos , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Isoanticorpos/imunologia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 111(12): 749-757, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29861295

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: GARFIELD-AF is a non-interventional worldwide study of adults with atrial fibrillation. AIMS: To analyse the characteristics of the 1399 patients recruited in France from August 2010 to July 2015, their 1-year outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (≤6 weeks' duration) and ≥1 stroke risk factor were eligible. Patient demographics, medical history and antithrombotic treatment were recorded at baseline. The incidences of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, new acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The median age was 76.0 years; 44.5% of patients were female. The median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.0 and 2.0, respectively. At diagnosis, 78.9% of patients received anticoagulant therapy±antiplatelet therapy; more patients received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; 46.0%) than direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; 32.9%). The median proportion of time in the therapeutic range for VKAs was 65.6%. Between 2010 and 2015, anticoagulant prescription increased, driven by the growing use of DOACs±antiplatelet therapy (1.1% to 50.0%), whereas prescription of VKAs±antiplatelet therapy decreased (74.4% to 32.3%). All-cause mortality was the most frequent event (6.75 per 100 person-years). Risk-adjusted event rates for France showed that stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality occurred more frequently than in GARFIELD-AF overall, whereas the rates of major bleeding were similar. In terms of healthcare resource utilization, the highest cost was associated with inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled in France had higher rates of mortality and stroke/systemic embolism than in GARFIELD-AF overall. Conversely, the risk of major bleeding was not higher.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Recursos em Saúde , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/economia , Fibrilação Atrial/sangue , Fibrilação Atrial/economia , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/economia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/sangue , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 59(4): 572-579, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29745215

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a highly prevalent disease with severe long-term consequences, and a known risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). These two diseases combined are responsible for high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to investigate the burden of PAD in patients with DM, the effect of revascularization on outcomes, and geographical variation in the access to PAD courses of treatment. METHODS: From the healthcare claims of the Lombardy residents (16% of the Italian population) we identified diabetic patients with PAD as the study population, distinguishing between patients who received revascularization procedures (Revasc) and those who did not (NoRevasc). Patients were classified by sex, age, comorbidities, mortality, amputation received and direct healthcare cost. RESULTS: The DM with PAD study population consisted of 18,344 patients (61% male), aged on average 72 (±10.1) years. Most of them (64%) did not receive any revascularization procedures and 12% of the latter had at least one major amputation. The major amputation rate was significantly lower for the Revasc group when compared to the NoRevasc group. Geographical heterogeneity in DM and PAD occurrences as well as in revascularization procedures was detected in the area under study. CONCLUSIONS: The present study gives an up-to-date description of the dramatic epidemiologic and economic burden of PAD in diabetic subjects using a truly population-based data and longitudinal follow-up of up to 9 years. It represented a useful tool to evaluate the impact of revascularization and to provide evidence of different outcomes associated with different levels of access to services.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade/tendências , Custos e Análise de Custo , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/etiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
14.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 36(3): 263-284, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29170896

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cost is currently one of the most important aspects in haemophilia care. Factor concentrates absorb more than 90% of healthcare direct costs of haemophilia care, and the debate regarding the high cost of haemophilia treatments and their different use across different countries is increasing. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review cost-effectiveness analyses conducted on treatment options in haemophilia, focusing on their results and their strengths and limitations; to highlight the possible issues associated with economic evaluations of new treatment options. METHODS: Electronic searches in PubMed and EMBASE were performed to retrieve papers published between November 2015 and September 2017 to update the previous review of economic evaluations of haemophilia treatments by Drummond et al. Reference lists of included articles and reviews were examined for relevant studies, which were assessed for their quality and their empirical results. RESULTS: Twenty-six relevant economic analyses were identified; 15 (57.7%) were conducted in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors while 11 (42.3%) involved patients without inhibitors. There were methodological variations among the included studies, and differences in the treatment schemes make a comparative assessment of interventions for patients with haemophilia difficult. Only immune tolerance induction showed consistent results in its cost-saving profile compared with the treatment with bypassing agents. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluations of haemophilia treatments are increasing, but the identification of general cost-effectiveness trends is still difficult in these studies. We are now facing a new era in haemophilia management with a soaring need for high-quality economic evaluations, performed through proactive collaboration between clinical experts, budget holders and health economists.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Previsões , Hemofilia A/economia , Hemofilia B/economia , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
16.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 42(18): 1398-1404, 2017 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28187074

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective large population based-study. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the epidemiologic trends and economic burden of first spinal fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No adequate data are available regarding the epidemiology of spinal fusion surgery and its economic impact in Europe. METHODS: The study population was identified through a data warehouse (DENALI), which matches clinical and economic data of different Healthcare Administrative databases of the Italian Lombardy Region. The study population consisted of all subjects, resident in Lombardy, who, during the period January 2001 to December 2010, underwent spinal fusion surgery (ICD-9-CM codes: 81.04, 81.05, 81.06, 81.07, and 81.08). The first procedure was used as the index event. We estimated the incidence of first spinal fusion surgery, the population and surgery characteristics and the healthcare costs from the National Health Service's perspective. The analysis was performed for the entire population and divided into the main groups of diagnosis. RESULTS: The analysis identified 17,772 [mean age (SD): 54.6 (14.5) years, 55.3% females] spinal fusion surgeries. Almost 67% of the patients suffered from a lumbar degenerative disease. The incidence rate of interventions increased from 11.5 to 18.5 per 100,000 person-year between 2001 and 2006, and was above 20.0 per 100,000 person-year in the last 4 years. The patients' mean age increased during the observational time period from 48.1 to 55.9 years; whereas the median hospital length of stay reported for the index event decreased. The average cost of the spinal fusion surgery increased during the observational period, from &OV0556; 4726 up to &OV0556; 9388. CONCLUSION: The study showed an increasing incidence of spinal fusion surgery and costs from 2001 to 2010. These results can be used to better understand the epidemiological and economic burden of these interventions, and help to optimize the resources available considering the different clinical approaches accessible today. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Liver Int ; 37(7): 982-994, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27943549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has been undertreated among elderly patients. Interferon-free treatment represents an opportunity for these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of directly acting antivirals (DAAs) in CHC elderly patients. METHODS: A Markov model of CHC natural history was built. This study focuses on CHC patients older than 65 years, stratified according to genotype (1/4, 2 and 3), liver fibrosis (METAVIR F1 to F4), age and frailty phenotype (robust, pre-frail and frail). DAAs combination vs no treatment was simulated for each theoretical population, assessing life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in a lifetime time horizon and by the Healthcare System perspective. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio increased with age and frailty status in all fibrosis stages. For robust F3 and F4 patients ICERs remained below the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of 40 000€/QALY up to age 75 and 86 years, respectively, depending on drug price and sustained virological response probability (sensitivity analysis). Notably, in F4 and frail subjects older than 75 years, ICER was more sensitive to non-liver-related mortality rate. In elderly F1 and F2 patients, ICERs were below WTP only up to 77 years old, with wide variability among frailty phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness of DAAs treatment of elderly CHC patients is solid in those with advanced fibrosis, but it depends strongly on frailty status and age, particularly in patients with milder fibrosis stages. Accurate assessment of clinical variables, including frailty, is necessary to allocate limited resources to this special population.


Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Cirrose Hepática/economia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Progressão da Doença , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 28(6): 425-430, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27898515

RESUMO

: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A patients. A microsimulation model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis vs. standard prophylaxis and estimate cost, annual joint bleed rate (AJBR), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio over a 1-year time horizon for a hypothetical population of 10 000 severe haemophilia A patients. A dose of 30 IU/kg per 48 h was assumed for standard prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic prophylaxis was individually adjusted to maintain trough levels at least 1 and 5 IU/dl or less. AJBR was estimated on the relationship between factor VIII (FVIII) levels and bleeding rate reported in the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability of the model and the reliability of results. The FVIII dose was reduced in the 27.8% of patients with a trough level more than 5 IU/dl on standard prophylaxis, with a negligible impact on AJBR (+0.1 bleed/year). The FVIII dose was increased in the 10.6% of patients with trough levels less than 1 IU/dl on standard prophylaxis, with a significant reduction of AJBR (-1.9 bleeds/year). On average, overall, pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis was shown to decrease the AJBR from 1.012 to 0.845 with a slight reduction of the infusion dose of 0.36 IU/kg, with total saving of 5 197&OV0556; per patient-year. Pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis was preferable (i.e. more effective and less costly) compared with standard prophylaxis, with savings of 31 205&OV0556; per bleed avoided. Pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis, accounting for patients' individual pharmacokinetic variability, appears to be a promising strategy to improve outcomes with efficient use of available resources in severe haemophilia A patients.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Hemofilia A/economia , Farmacocinética , Pré-Medicação/métodos , Fator VIII/administração & dosagem , Fator VIII/economia , Hemartrose/economia , Hemartrose/prevenção & controle , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pré-Medicação/economia
19.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 34(1): 68-75, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26633622

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Poor information on long-term outcomes and costs on tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are available. Our aim was to evaluate long-term costs and benefits of TNF- inhibitors in PsA patients with inadequate response to conventional treatment with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tDMARDs). METHODS: Fifty-five out of 107 enrolled patients included in the study at one year, completed the 5-year follow-up period. These patients were enrolled in 8 of 9 centres included in the study at one year. Patients aged older than 18 years, with different forms of PsA and failure or intolerance to tDMARDs therapy were treated with anti-TNF agents. Information on resource use, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disease activity, function and laboratory values were collected at baseline and through the 5 years of therapy. Costs (expressed in Euro 2011) and utility (measured by EQ-5D instrument) before TNF inhibitor therapy and after 1 and 5 years were compared. RESULTS: The majority of patients (46 out of 55; 83.6%) had a predominant or exclusive peripheral arthritis and 16.4% had predominant or exclusive axial involvement. There was a statistically significant improvement of the most important clinical variables after 1 year of follow-up. These improvements were maintained also after 5 years. The direct costs increased by approximately €800 per patient-month after 1 year, the indirect costs decreased by €100 and the overall costs increased by more than €700 per patient-month due to the cost of TNF inhibitor therapy. Costs at 5 year were similar to the costs at 1 year. The HRQoL parameters showed the same trends of the clinical variables. EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D utility and SF-36 PCS score showed a significant improvement after 1 year, maintained at 5 years. SF-36 MCS showed an improvement only at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that TNF blockers have long-term efficacy. The higher cost of TNF inhibitor therapy was balanced by a significant improvement of HRQoL, stable at 5 years of follow-up. Our results need to be confirmed in larger samples of patients.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/economia , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Substituição de Medicamentos/economia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/imunologia , Artrite Psoriásica/psicologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Qualidade de Vida , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/imunologia
20.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 62(10): 1826-31, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25976056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia are well-established and include the following: reduced bleeding episodes, prevention of joint damage, decreased inhibitor development, and improved health-related quality of life. However, the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis is still not clear. PROCEDURES: We reviewed the published hemophilia prophylaxis economic models focusing on utility assumptions. RESULTS: We found six cost-utility studies that compared prophylaxis and on-demand regimens. These studies reported remarkably different results, using utility values based on different assumptions and data sources. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that cooperation among key stakeholders (clinicians, patient organizations and health-care decision makers) as a means of collecting evidence-based and experiential data to represent both the utility and the quality of life changes for patients with Hemophilia A who are treated with prophylaxis or receive on-demand treatments may represent a winning strategy with which to resolve the outstanding issues related to health technology assessments in the care of patients with hemophilia.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA